Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Trauma ; 60(6): 1155-61; discussion 1161-4, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16766956

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Forward Resuscitative Surgical System (FRSS) is a small, mobile trauma surgical unit designed to support modern US Marine Corps combat operations. The experience of two co-located FRSS teams during 1 year of service in Operation Iraqi Freedom is reviewed to evaluate the system's efficacy. METHODS: Between March 1, 2004, and February 28, 2005, two FRSS teams and a shock trauma platoon were co-located in a unit designated the Surgical Shock Trauma Platoon (SSTP). Data concerning patient care before and during treatment at the SSTP was maintained prospectively. Prospective determination of outcomes was obtained by e-mail correspondence with surgeons caring for the patients at higher echelons. The Los Angeles County medical center (LAC) trauma registry was queried to obtain a comparable data-base with which to compare outcomes. RESULTS: During the year reviewed there were 895 trauma admissions to the SSTP. Excluding 25 patients pulseless on arrival and 291 minimally injured patients, 559 of 579 (97%) combat casualties survived; 417 casualties underwent 981 operative procedures in the two SSTP operating shelters. There were 79 operative patients with a mean injury severity score of 26 (range, 16-59) and mean revised trauma score of 6.963 (range, 4.21-7.841) who had sustained severe injuries. Ten (12.7%) of these casualties died while 43 of 337 (12.8%) deaths were seen with comparable cases treated at LAC. CONCLUSIONS: Small task-oriented surgical units are capable of providing effective trauma surgical care to combat casualties. Further experience is needed to better delineate the balance between early, forward-based surgical intervention and more prolonged initial casualty evacuation to reach more robust surgical facilities.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Hospitais de Emergência/organização & administração , Medicina Militar/organização & administração , Militares , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Eficiência Organizacional , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Iraque , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Triagem/organização & administração , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Guerra , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade
2.
Mil Med ; 161(8): 453-7, 1996 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8772296

RESUMO

Numerous reports have suggested that surgical readiness during Operation Desert Storm was poor. We surveyed active duty Navy surgeons to assess current trauma experience and capability. A survey concerning trauma and critical care experience, as well as self-rating of skills, was mailed to all active duty surgeons (n = 185) in 1993. The response rate was 79% (146/185). A high turnover rate of surgeons was indicated by: (1) 51% (75/146) of surgeons had less than 3 years of experience following residency; and (2) only 42% (61/146) had served in the Gulf War. Only 12% of active duty surgeons (18/146) were involved in trauma care. Only 10% (14/146) had performed more than 20 operations for trauma in the preceding 1 years, and 85% (124/146) had performed fewer than 10 operations. In the preceding 5 years, 84% (122/146) had performed fewer than 100 operations for trauma, and 42% (61/146) had performed none. Critical care experience ranged from 0 to 20 patients per month (mean = 3). Despite limited recent experience, 84% (123/146) of respondents rated their trauma skills as adequate (n = 43), good (n = 49), or excellent (n = 31). We conclude that most Navy surgeons have minimal recent experience in trauma care. A high rate of turnover mandates training strategies that provide an ongoing exposure to injured patients. This could be accomplished by designating military hospitals as trauma centers or by placing military surgeons in civilian trauma centers.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Militares , Medicina Naval , Traumatologia , Competência Clínica , Hospitais Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos
4.
J Trauma ; 34(2): 313-4, 1993 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8459481

RESUMO

Salvage of intraperitoneal blood with autotransfusion is a well-accepted practice. Laparoscopic examination is gaining popularity and holds diagnostic promise for the evaluation of trauma patients. We describe herein the successful combination of these techniques in a patient who sustained blunt abdominal trauma, facilitating splenic salvage, autotransfusion, and avoidance of laparotomy.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Transfusão de Sangue Autóloga/métodos , Baço/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Adulto , Hemoperitônio/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...