Somatic RAS mutations occur in a large proportion of sporadic RET-negative medullary thyroid carcinomas and extend to a previously unidentified exon.

CONTEXT: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is characterized by proto-oncogene RET mutations in almost all hereditary cases as well as in more than 40% of sporadic cases. Recently, a high prevalence of RAS mutations was reported in sporadic MTC, suggesting an alternative genetic event in sporadic MTC tumorigenesis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to extend this observation by screening somatic mutational status of RET, BRAF, and the three RAS proto-oncogenes in a large series of patients with MTC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Direct sequencing of RET (exons 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16), BRAF (exons 11 and 15), and KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS genes (exons 2, 3, and 4) was performed on DNA prepared from 50 MTC samples, including 30 sporadic cases. RESULTS: Activating RET mutations were detected in the 20 hereditary cases (germline mutations) and in 14 sporadic cases (somatic mutations). Among the 16 sporadic MTC without any RET mutation, eight H-RAS mutations and five K-RAS mutations were found. Interestingly, nine RAS mutations correspond to mutation hot spots in exons 2 and 3, but the other four mutations were detected in exon 4. The RET and RAS mutations were mutually exclusive. No RAS gene mutation was found in hereditary MTC, and no BRAF or NRAS mutation was observed in any of the 50 samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that RAS mutations are frequent events in sporadic MTC. Moreover, we showed that RAS mutation analysis should not be limited to the classical mutational hot spots of RAS genes and should include analysis of exon 4.

Two silent substitutions in the PDHA1 gene cause exon 5 skipping by disruption of a putative exonic splicing enhancer.

BACKGROUND: Synonymous mutations within exons may cause aberrant splicing by disrupting exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) motifs in the vicinity of non consensus splice sites. Mutational analysis of PDHA1 revealed only one silent single nucleotide substitution in exon 5 in two unrelated boys and a girl (c.483C>T and c.498C>T variants, respectively). For both patients, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity was low and the immunoreactive E1alpha protein was defective in cultured fibroblasts. METHODS AND RESULTS: One of the boys was a somatic mosaic for the c.483C>T variant, as shown by the variable ratio of mutant to normal alleles in fibroblast, lymphocyte and single hair root DNA. Transcript analysis in fibroblasts from the three patients revealed the presence of both normal and truncated cDNAs, with the splicing out of exon 5 predicted to result in a frame shift and premature termination (p.Arg141AlafsX11). The treatment of fibroblasts with emetine before harvesting to prevent nonsense mRNA-mediated decay increased the amount of mutant mRNA. In silico analysis revealed that each variant disrupted a putative SRp55 binding site and that the intron 5 donor splice site (5'ss) contained a weak splicing signal. Transient transfection of COS-7 or Hela cells with hybrid minigene constructs containing wild-type or mutant PDHA1 exon 5, followed by RT-PCR demonstrated that each variant resulted in the incomplete inclusion of PDHA1 exon 5, and that this defect was corrected following the restoration of a perfect consensus sequence for the 5' splice site by site-directed mutagenesis. CONCLUSION: These two synonymous mutations expand the spectrum of rare PDHA1 splicing mutations, all of which are located in non canonical splice sites.