Perspectives of people living with a spinal cord injury on activity-based therapy.

PURPOSE: Activity-Based Therapy (ABT) targets recovery of function below the injury level in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). This qualitative study is the first to capture the perspectives of individuals with SCI on community ABT programs in Canada. METHODS: Ten participants (6 males, aged 23.0-65.0 years, 2.5-23.0 years post-SCI) were recruited using purposive sampling, and completed semi-structured interviews. Interview questions explored benefits and challenges, facilitators and barriers to access, and motivations for participating in ABT. Themes were identified using conventional content analysis and collaboratively analyzed using the DEPICT model. RESULTS: An overarching theme of ABT as a key part of participants' evolving and lifelong recovery process emerged. Motivations for initiating ABT included dissatisfaction with early rehabilitation, and a desire to improve function and stay active. Participants perceived that ABT contributed to neurological recovery, physical and mental health benefits, independence, and hope. Factors contributing to recovery and factors limiting accessibility and participation in ABT were identified. Participants discussed advocating for ABT, and how ABT empowered self-management. CONCLUSIONS: ABT was perceived to play a significant role in promoting ongoing recovery and well-being in individuals with SCI. Addressing limitations in awareness and availability of ABT may improve participation in ABT programs.Implications for rehabilitationActivity-Based Therapy (ABT) targets recovery of function and sensation below the level of injury in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).ABT plays a key role in the evolving and lifelong recovery process of individuals with SCI.Participants reported that ABT has a positive impact on physical, functional, and psychosocial domains, leading to improved independence and quality of life.Awareness and availability of ABT remain limited, highlighting a need to further explore and address factors limiting access to this therapy.

Exploring the need for and application of human factors and ergonomics in ambulance design: Overcoming the barriers with technical standards.

Ergonomic risk factors, such as excessive physical effort, awkward postures or repetitive movements, were the leading causes of injuries amongst EMS workers in the United States, of which 90% were attributed to lifting, carrying, or transferring a patient and/or equipment. Although the essential tasks of patient handling, transport, and care cannot be eliminated, the design of ambulances and associated equipment is modifiable. Our aims were to identify the extent of Human Factors and Ergonomic (HFE) considerations in existing ambulance design standards/regulations, and describe how HFE and the standards/regulations were applied in the EMS system. Through an extensive environmental scan of jurisdictionally relevant standards/regulations and key informant interviews, our findings demonstrated that existing standards/regulations had limited considerations for HFE. As a result, HFE principles continue to be considered reactively through retrofit rather than proactively in upstream design. We recommend that performance-based HFE requirements be integrated directly into ambulance design standards.

Existing Science on Human Factors and Ergonomics in the Design of Ambulances and EMS Equipment.

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel face a disproportionally high risk for fatality and injury due to the nature of their work; and current ambulance and EMS equipment design standards do not adequately safeguard EMS personnel from sacrificing personal safety for patient care, a known human factors and ergonomic (HFE) design challenge. Despite the desire to include HFE interventions or considerations into a standard, the effectiveness of existing HFE interventions for EMS is unclear. Objective: Therefore, this study aimed to synthesize the peer-reviewed literature on the design features of patient compartments and EMS equipment that affect EMS personnel's performance or well-being. Methods: A scoping review methodology was applied to systematically search and screen for relevant articles, and extract data. Three databases (EmBase, Scopus, and PubMed) were searched, and search results were screened for articles that pertained to the performance or well-being of EMS personnel when interacting with the patient compartment or its associated equipment. Results and Discussion: Of the 4,125 search results, 48 relevant articles were retained, and then sorted into one of 3 categories: general design, patient handling, and patient transport. It was concluded that, although research has progressed over the past 15 years, more research, development, and resources are needed. Newer generations of ambulances have not been shown to be safer during collisions and there is a knowledge gap in how occupants and contents of a patient compartment behave during a collision. Crash-tests have been performed with restrained occupants and supplies; however, that scenario is unrealistic in the field. While the existing literature provided initial ideas and innovations for improving the HFE of patient handling and patient transport, it is important for future research to convey findings in a manner that can be used to inform design standards.