Angiotensin II Disrupts Neurovascular Coupling by Potentiating Calcium Increases in Astrocytic Endfeet.

Background Angiotensin II (Ang II), a critical mediator of hypertension, impairs neurovascular coupling. Since astrocytes are key regulators of neurovascular coupling, we sought to investigate whether Ang II impairs neurovascular coupling through modulation of astrocytic Ca2+ signaling. Methods and Results Using laser Doppler flowmetry, we found that Ang II attenuates cerebral blood flow elevations induced by whisker stimulation or the metabotropic glutamate receptors agonist, 1S, 3R-1-aminocyclopentane-trans-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (P<0.01). In acute brain slices, Ang II shifted the vascular response induced by 1S, 3R-1-aminocyclopentane-trans-1,3-dicarboxylic acid towards vasoconstriction (P<0.05). The resting and 1S, 3R-1-aminocyclopentane-trans-1,3-dicarboxylic acid-induced Ca2+ levels in the astrocytic endfeet were more elevated in the presence of Ang II (P<0.01). Both effects were reversed by the AT1 receptor antagonist, candesartan (P<0.01 for diameter and P<0.05 for calcium levels). Using photolysis of caged Ca2+ in astrocytic endfeet or pre-incubation of 1,2-Bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetra-acetic acid tetrakis (acetoxymethyl ester), we demonstrated the link between potentiated Ca2+ elevation and impaired vascular response in the presence of Ang II (P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively). Both intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and Ca2+ influx through transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 mediated Ang II-induced astrocytic Ca2+ elevation, since blockade of these pathways significantly prevented the intracellular Ca2+ in response to 1S, 3R-1-aminocyclopentane-trans-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (P<0.05). Conclusions These results suggest that Ang II through its AT1 receptor potentiates the astrocytic Ca2+ responses to a level that promotes vasoconstriction over vasodilation, thus altering cerebral blood flow increases in response to neuronal activity.

Differential effect of angiotensin II and blood pressure on hippocampal inflammation in mice.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II (Ang II), a peptide hormone involved in the development of hypertension, causes systemic and cerebral inflammation, affecting brain regions important for blood pressure control. The cause-and-effect relationship between hypertension and inflammation is two-way, but the role of blood pressure in the induction of cerebral inflammation is less clear. The vulnerability of specific brain regions, particularly those important for memory, is also of interest. METHODS: We used molecular biology approaches, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy to examine the interdependence between the hypertensive and pro-inflammatory effects of Ang II. We examined the effect of blood pressure by administering a subpressive (200 ng/kg/min) or a pressive Ang II dose (1000 or 1900 ng/kg/min) with and without hydralazine (150 mg/L) for 1 week and used phenylephrine to increase blood pressure independently of the renin-angiotensin system. RESULTS: Ang II increased ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1) levels (marker of microgliosis) in the whole brain and in the hippocampus in a dose-dependent manner. Pressive Ang II induced specific changes in microglial morphology, indicating differences in functional phenotype. An increase in hippocampal glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was seen in mice receiving pressive Ang II, while no induction of cerebral gliosis was observed after 7 days of subpressive Ang II infusion. Although phenylephrine led to increased astrogliosis, it did not affect Iba-1 expression. Pressive Ang II stimulated TNF-α production in the hippocampus, and daily treatment with hydralazine prevented this increase. Hydralazine also reduced GFAP and Iba-1 levels. With longer perfusion (14 days), subpressive Ang II led to some but not all the inflammatory changes detected with the pressive doses, mainly an increase in CD68 and Iba-1 but not of GFAP or TNF-α. CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure and Ang II differentially contribute to hippocampal inflammation in mice. Control of blood pressure and Ang II levels should prevent or reduce brain inflammation and therefore brain dysfunctions associated with hypertension.

The impact of new partial AUC parameters for evaluating the bioequivalence of prolonged-release formulations.

To demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) between two prolonged-release (PR) drug formulations, single dose studies under fasting and fed state as well as at least one steady-state study are currently required by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Recently, however, there have been debates regarding the relevance of steady-state studies. New requirements in single-dose investigations have also been suggested by the EMA to address the absence of a parameter that can adequately assess the equivalence of the shape of the curves. In the draft guideline issued in 2013, new partial area under the curve (pAUC) pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were introduced to that effect. In light of these potential changes, there is a need of supportive clinical evidence to evaluate the impact of pAUCs on the evaluation of BE between PR formulations. In this retrospective analysis, it was investigated whether the newly defined parameters were associated with an increase in discriminatory ability or a change in variability compared to the conventional PK parameters. Among the single dose studies that met the requirements already in place, 20% were found unable to meet the EMA's new requirements in regards to the pAUC PK parameters. When pairing fasting and fed studies for a same formulation, the failure rate increased to 40%. In some cases, due to the high variability of these parameters, an increase of the sample size would be required to prove BE. In other cases however, the pAUC parameters demonstrated a robust ability to detect differences between the shapes of the curves of PR formulations. The present analysis should help to better understand the impact of the upcoming changes in European regulations on PR formulations and in the design of future BE studies.

The complex contribution of NOS interneurons in the physiology of cerebrovascular regulation.

Following the discovery of the vasorelaxant properties of nitric oxide (NO) by Furchgott and Ignarro, the finding by Bredt and coll. of a constitutively expressed NO synthase in neurons (nNOS) led to the presumption that neuronal NO may control cerebrovascular functions. Consequently, numerous studies have sought to determine whether neuraly-derived NO is involved in the regulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Anatomically, axons, dendrites, or somata of NO neurons have been found to contact the basement membrane of blood vessels or perivascular astrocytes in all segments of the cortical microcirculation. Functionally, various experimental approaches support a role of neuronal NO in the maintenance of resting CBF as well as in the vascular response to neuronal activity. Since decades, it has been assumed that neuronal NO simply diffuses to the local blood vessels and produce vasodilation through a cGMP-PKG dependent mechanism. However, NO is not the sole mediator of vasodilation in the cerebral microcirculation and is known to interact with a myriad of signaling pathways also involved in vascular control. In addition, cerebrovascular regulation is the result of a complex orchestration between all components of the neurovascular unit (i.e., neuronal, glial, and vascular cells) also known to produce NO. In this review article, the role of NO interneuron in the regulation of cortical microcirculation will be discussed in the context of the neurovascular unit.