Use of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine as Part of an Abdominal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Pathway Does Not Significantly Impact Postoperative Pain.

BACKGROUND: The utility of perioperative intravenous lidocaine in improving postoperative pain control remains unclear. We aimed to compare postoperative pain outcomes in ERP abdominal surgery patients who did vs did not receive intravenous lidocaine. We hypothesized that patients receiving lidocaine would have lower postoperative pain scores and consume fewer opioids. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery at a single institution via an ERP from 2017 to 2018. Patients who received lidocaine in the 6 months prior to a lidocaine shortage were compared to those who did not receive lidocaine for 6 months following the shortage. The primary outcome measures were pain scores as measured on the visual analogue scale and opioid consumption as measured by oral morphine equivalents (OME). RESULTS: We identified 1227 consecutive ERP abdominal surgery patients for inclusion (519 patients receiving lidocaine and 708 patients not receiving lidocaine). Demographics between the two cohorts were similar, with the following exceptions: more females, and more patients with a history of psychiatric diagnoses in the group that did not receive lidocaine. Adjusted, mixed linear models for both OME (P = .23) and pain scores (P = .51) found no difference between the lidocaine and no lidocaine groups. DISCUSSION: In our study of ERP abdominal surgery patients, perioperative intravenous lidocaine did not offer improvement in postoperative pain scores or OME consumed. We therefore do not recommend the use of intravenous lidocaine as part of an ERP multimodal pain management strategy in abdominal surgery patients.

Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force.

The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) is committed to improving the quality, safety, and value that cardiothoracic anesthesiologists bring to patient care. To fulfill this mission, the SCA supports the creation of peer-reviewed manuscripts that establish standards, produce guidelines, critically analyze the literature, interpret preexisting guidelines, and allow experts to engage in consensus opinion. The aim of this report, commissioned by the SCA President, is to summarize the distinctions among these publications and describe a novel SCA-supported framework that provides guidance to SCA members for the creation of these publications. The ultimate goal is that through a standardized and transparent process, the SCA will facilitate up-to-date education and implementation of best practices by cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesiologists to improve patient safety, quality of care, and outcomes.

The Year in Thoracic Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2022.

This article reviews research highlights in the field of thoracic anesthesia. The highlights of this year included new developments in the preoperative assessment and prehabilitation of patients requiring thoracic surgery, updates on the use of devices for one-lung ventilation (OLV) in adults and children, updates on the anesthetic and postoperative management of these patients, including protective OLV ventilation, the use of opioid-sparing techniques and regional anesthesia, and outcomes using enhanced recovery after surgery, as well as the use of expanding indications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, specialized anesthetic techniques for airway surgery, and nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Enhanced Recovery Protocols Reduce Mortality Across Eight Surgical Specialties at Academic and University-affiliated Community Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if implementation of a simplified ERP across multiple surgical specialties in different hospitals is associated with improved short and long-term mortality. Secondary aims were to examine ERP effect on length of stay, 30-day readmission, discharge disposition, and complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Enhanced recovery after surgery and various derivative ERPs have been successfully implemented. These protocols typically include elaborate sets of multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches, which can make implementation challenging or are variable across different specialties. Few studies have shown if a simplified version of ERP implemented across multiple surgical specialties can improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: A simplified ERP with 7 key domains (minimally invasive surgical approach when feasible, pre-/intra-operative multimodal analgesia, postoperative multimodal analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, early diet advancement, early ambulation, and early removal of urinary catheter) was implemented in 5 academic and community hospitals within a single health system. Patients who underwent nonemergent, major orthopedic or abdominal surgery including hip/knee replacement, hepatobiliary, colorectal, gynecology oncology, bariatric, general, and urological surgery were included. Propensity-matched, retrospective case-control analysis was performed on all eligible surgical patients between 2014 and 2017 after ERP implementation or in the 12 months preceding ERP implementation (control population). RESULTS: A total of 9492 patients (5185 ERP and 4307 controls) underwent ERP eligible surgery during the study period. Three thousand three hundred sixty-seven ERP patients were matched by surgical specialty and hospital site to control non-ERP patients. Short and long-term mortality was improved in ERP patients: 30 day: ERP 0.2% versus control 0.6% ( P = 0.002); 1-year: ERP 3.9% versus control 5.1% ( P < 0.0001); 2-year: ERP 6.2% versus control 9.0% ( P < 0.0001). Length of stay was significantly lower in ERP patients (ERP: 3.9 ± 3.8 days; control: 4.8 ± 5.0 days, P < 0.0001). ERP patients were also less likely to be discharged to a facility (ERP: 11.3%; control: 14.8%, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference for 30-day readmission. All complications except venous thromboembolism were significantly reduced in the ERP population (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A simplified ERP can uniformly be implemented across multiple surgical specialties and hospital types. ERPs improve short and long-term mortality, clinical outcomes, length of stay, and discharge disposition to home.

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion with concomitant cardiac surgical procedures: exacerbating heart failure or preventing stroke.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a common source of thromboembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Current guidelines recommend consideration of surgical LAA occlusion concomitant with other cardiac surgical procedures based mostly on observational data and a few small trials. Recently published results of several large retrospective studies and one prospective trial are reviewed herein. RECENT FINDINGS: Large retrospective studies using quality and administrative databases show mixed results with regard to efficacy of surgical LAA occlusion in preventing stroke, although most showed stroke reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Safety concerns have been raised based on nonrandomized data suggesting increased complications. A recent large, multicenter international randomized study with 3-year follow-up demonstrated significant reduction in stroke following LAA occlusion with no differences in death or heart failure exacerbations. SUMMARY: Most patients with AF undergoing another cardiac surgical procedure should be considered for concomitant LAA occlusion as part of a heart team discussion. The choice of surgical closure technique is critical. There is insufficient data to recommend LAA occlusion as an alternative to anticoagulation.

Sternotomy Wound Infiltration With Liposomal Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Poor pain control after cardiac surgery can be associated with postoperative complications, longer recovery, and development of chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that adding liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to plain bupivacaine (PB) will provide better and long-lasting analgesia when used for wound infiltration in median sternotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery through median sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: A single surgeon performed wound infiltration of LB plus PB or PB into the sternotomy wound, chest, and mediastinal tube sites. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were followed up for 72 hours for pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events. Sixty patients completed the study for analysis (LB group [n = 29], PB group [n = 31]). Patient characteristics, procedural variables, and pain scores measured at specific intervals from 4 hours until 72 hours postoperatively did not reveal any significant differences between the groups. Mixed-model regression showed that the trend of mean pain scores at movement in the LB group was significantly (p = 0.01) lower compared with the PB group. Opioid consumption over 72 hours was not significantly different between the 2 groups (oral morphine equivalents; median [interquartile range], 139 [73, 212] mg in LB v 105 [54, 188] mg in PB, p = 0.29). Recovery characteristics and adverse events were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: LB added to PB for sternotomy wound infiltration during elective cardiac surgery did not significantly improve the quality of postoperative analgesia.

Hyperbaric effects on cold stored whole blood following a military dive mission profile.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) is carried by special operations forces as part of a remote damage control resuscitation strategy. The effects of an underwater mission on the quality and coagulation profile of WB were simulated by exposure to hyperbaric pressures in a chamber. METHODS: WB units collected in CPDA-1 were exposed to three different combinations of hyperbaric pressure and duration of exposure: Group A 153.52 kPa (15.24 msw; 1.52 atm) for 4 h; n = 9, Group B 506.63 kPa (50.29 msw; 5.00 atm) for 1 h; n = 9, Group C 153.52 kPa (15.24 msw; 1.52 atm) for 1 h; n = 7. The following parameters were measured on each unit: prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, thromboelastography and concentration determinations of platelets, lactate, fibrinogen, and lactate dehydrogenase. Each sample underwent baseline, prepressurization, immediate postpressurization, and 6 h postpressurization laboratory testing. RESULTS: Six hours following hyperbaric exposure, the lactate concentration in group C was higher than prepressurization measurement and the platelet concentration in Group A was lower than prepressurization measurement. There were no changes in any of the other analyzed biochemical, coagulation and thromboelastogram parameters following exposure to hyperbaric stress. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that pressurization of WB up to 5 atm did not impact parameters tested. Changes observed in lactate and platelet count need further study, as well as complementary testing of red blood cell integrity. Further investigation of the hyperbaric extremes is necessary to determine if there is a damage inducing pressure to which WB should not be exposed.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2020 Part I - Lung Transplantation.

This special article focuses on the highlights in cardiothoracic transplantation literature in the year 2020. Part I encompasses the recent literature on lung transplantation, including the advances in preoperative assessment and optimization, donor management, including the use of ex-vivo lung perfusion, recipient management, including those who have been infected with coronavirus disease 2019, updates on the perioperative management, including the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and long-term outcomes.

The Year in Thoracic Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2020.

Selected highlights in thoracic anesthesia in 2020 include updates in the preoperative assessment and prehabilitation of patients undergoing thoracic surgery; updates in one-lung ventilation (OLV) pertaining to the devices used for OLV; the use of dexmedetomidine for lung protection during OLV and protective ventilation, recommendations for the care of thoracic surgical patients with coronavirus disease 2019; a review of recent meta-analyses comparing truncal blocks with paravertebral and thoracic epidural blocks; and a review of outcomes after initiating the enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines for lung and esophageal surgery.

Perioperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Practice By Cardiac Anesthesiologists-Report of a "Start-Up" Experience.

OBJECTIVE: In this paper, the authors report their experience of perioperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) practice and its impact on perioperative patient management. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 101 adult ASA II-V male and female patients >18 years old who were scheduled for or having surgery were included in this retrospective case series. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent a focused perioperative TTE exam performed by cardiac anesthesiologists with significant TTE experience, and further clinical management was based on echocardiography findings discussed with the anesthesia care team. MEASUREMENTS: Significant echocardiographic findings and changes in patient management were reported. Step-up management was a new intervention that was executed based on echocardiographic findings (volume infusion, inotropic therapy, cardiology consultation, and other interventions), and step-down management was avoidance of an unnecessary intervention based on echocardiographic findings (proceeding to surgery without cancellation, delay, cardiology consultation, and additional investigations/interventions). MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of TTEs were performed in the preoperative setting, 34% were intra-operative, and 13% were postoperative. No significant findings were detected in 38 patients, leading to step-down management in all of them. Among patients with positive findings, left ventricular dysfunction (12.8%), hypovolemia (10.8%), and right ventricular dysfunction (7.9%) were the most common. Step-up therapy included inotropic/vasopressor therapy (24.8%), intensive care admission after surgery for further management (13.8%), volume infusion (12.8%), and other interventions (additional monitoring, surgical delay, cardiology consultation, and modification of surgical technique). CONCLUSION: Perioperative focused TTE examination is useful in the diagnosis of new cardiac conditions for anesthesia management (intraoperative monitoring and hemodynamic therapy) and postoperative care (intensive care unit admissions). Perioperative TTE performed by anesthesiologists can also help avoid procedural delays and unnecessary consults.

Anesthetic considerations in lung transplantation: past, present and future.

Lung transplantation is a very complex surgical procedure with many implications for the anesthetic care of these patients. Comprehensive preoperative evaluation is an important component of the transplant evaluation as it informs many of the decisions made perioperatively to manage these complex patients effectively and appropriately. These decisions may involve pre-emptive actions like pre-habilitation and nutrition optimization of these patients before they arrive for their transplant procedure. Appropriate airway and ventilation management of these patients needs to be performed in a manner that provides an optimal operating conditions and protection from ventilatory injury of these fragile post-transplant lungs. Pain management can be challenging and should be managed in a multi-modal fashion with or without the use of an epidural catheter while recognizing the risk of neuraxial technique in patients who will possibly be systemically anticoagulated. Complex monitoring is required for these patients involving both invasive and non-invasive including the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and continuous cardiac output monitoring. Management of the patient's hemodynamics can be challenging and involves managing the systemic and pulmonary vascular systems. Some patients may require extra-corporeal lung support as a planned part of the procedure or as a rescue technique and centers need to be proficient in instituting and managing this sophisticated method of hemodynamic support.

A specific enhanced recovery protocol decreases opioid use after thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols have not been investigated previously for cervical endocrine surgery. The study aim was to determine whether systematic implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol specific for thyroid/parathyroid surgery can improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A customized enhanced recovery protocol for thyroid/parathyroid surgery was designed and utilized systematically for all patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, thyroid lobectomy, or total thyroidectomy. Outcomes were assessed 12 months before enhanced recovery protocol implementation (n = 464 patients) and after enhanced recovery protocol implementation (n = 654 patients). RESULTS: Enhanced recovery protocol implementation was associated with a 72% decrease in mean oral morphine equivalents utilized in-house (before 82 ± 64 versus after 23 ± 28; P < .0001) and many enhanced recovery protocol patients were entirely opioid-free (0.2% vs 21%, P < .0001). When used, the enhanced recovery protocol was associated with a lesser mean amount of ondansetron to treat postoperative nausea and vomiting (5.5 mg ± 3 vs 4.5 ± 2: P < .0001). Duration of stay was short before implementation of the enhanced recovery protocol and did not change substantially after implementation (1.1 days ± 0.7 vs 1.1 ± 0.7; P = .26). CONCLUSION: The systematic use of a simple, cervical, endocrine surgery-specific enhanced recovery protocol decreased perioperative opioid use by ~70%, with significantly less postoperative nausea and vomiting. Implementation of a multidisciplinary enhanced recovery protocol may be an important initial step toward limiting opioid overuse during common operative procedures.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplantation Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2019.

The highlights in cardiothoracic transplantation focus on the recent research pertaining to heart and lung transplantation, including expansion of the donor pool, the optimization of donors and recipients, the use of mechanical support, the perioperative and long-term outcomes in these patient populations, and the use of transthoracic echocardiography to diagnose rejection.

Post-operative Nausea and Analgesia Following Total Mastectomy is Improved After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) provide a multimodal approach to perioperative care, with the aims of improving patient outcomes while decreasing perioperative antiemetic and narcotic requirements. With high rates of post-operative nausea or vomiting (PONV) following total mastectomy (TM), we hypothesized that our institutional designed ERP would reduce PONV while improving pain control and decrease opioid use. METHODS: An ERP was implemented at a single institution for patients undergoing TM with or without implant-based reconstruction. Patients from the first two months of implementation (ERP group, N = 72) were compared with a retrospective usual-care cohort from a three-month period before implementation (UC group, N = 83). Outcomes included PONV incidence, measured with antiemetic use; patient-reported pain scores; perioperative opioid consumption, measured by oral morphine equivalents (OME); and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: The characteristics of the two groups were similar. PONV incidence and perioperative opioid consumption were lower in the ERP than the UC group (21% vs. 40%, p 0.011 and mean 44.1 OME vs. 104.3 OME, p < 0.001), respectively. These differences in opioid consumption were observed in the operating room and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU); opioid consumption on the floor was similar between the two groups. Patient-reported pain scores were lower in the ERP than the UC group (mean highest pain score 6.4 vs. 7.4, p 0.003). PACU and hospital LOS were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ERP implementation was successful in decreasing PONV following TM with and without reconstruction, while simultaneously decreasing overall opioid consumption without compromising patient comfort.