Diagnostic-therapeutic management of bile duct cancer.

Biliary tract cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma, comprises a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that can emerge at any part of the biliary tree. This group is the second most common type of primary liver cancer. Diagnosis is usually based on symptoms, which may be heterogeneous, and nonspecific biomarkers in serum and biopsy specimens, as well as on imaging techniques. Endoscopy-based diagnosis is essential, since it enables biopsy specimens to be taken. In addition, it can help with locoregional staging of distal tumors. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a key technique for the evaluation and treatment of malignant biliary tumors. Correct staging of cholangiocarcinoma is essential in order to be able to determine the degree of resectability and assess the results of treatment. The tumor is staged based on the TNM classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. The approach will depend on the classification of the tumor. Thus, some patients with early-stage disease could benefit from surgery; complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of cure. However, only a minority of patients are diagnosed in the early stages and are suitable candidates for resection. In the subset of patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease, chemotherapy has been used to improve outcome and to delay tumor progression. The approach to biliary tract tumors should be multidisciplinary, involving experienced endoscopists, oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons.

Endoscopic progression of ulcerative proctitis to proximal disease. Can we identify predictors of progression?

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative proctitis is a type of ulcerative colitis circumscribed to the rectum. Proximal progression rates of the disease have been reported as between 27% and 54%. Several predictive factors have been identified for its progression; however, none has been established as definitive. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with ulcerative proctitis with at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients diagnosed between January 1992 and March 2017. Variables were collected at the time of diagnosis and during the first year of follow-up. The extent of the progression was evaluated endoscopically during follow-up. The endoscopic progression rate was determined and possible risk factors related to this progression were evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis involved 137 patients. In 77 of the patients, we performed a second colonoscopy during follow-up to evaluate endoscopic progression. The average time before the second colonoscopy performed was 5 years (SD 3.9). Of the 77 patients, 32 (41.6%) presented proximal progression to the rectosigmoid junction. Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant association for progression in patients who had suffered one or more flares in the first year following diagnosis. Significant progression was also observed in those with the longest time of progression at the final colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Ulcerative proctitis is not a stable disease over time. In addition, during the first year of the disease progression, it is possible to predict in which patients the disease will progress to more extensive forms.