RESUMO
BACKGROUND: O'Driscoll popularized the principle of linked column fixation for distal humerus fractures. Despite the linked column concept being widely accepted, there are few reported techniques to accomplish this goal. A novel device was designed based on the principles of linked columns. An interlocking beam is used to connect the medial and lateral plates, creating a unified fixed angle construct. Our primary objective was to report clinical outcomes across multiple institutions for a linking beam used in distal humerus fracture fixation. METHODS: A retrospective series was collected from five institutions for the TiBeam (Skeletal Dynamics, Miami, FL, USA) with a minimum follow-up of six months. Acute and chronic treatment of distal humerus fracture patterns, and all plate configurations were included for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 36 cases were collected at a mean age of 52 years and a mean follow-up of 19.3 months. AO C-type fractures were 56% of the series. The median MEPS was 85 (IQR 76.3 to 90), the median DASH was 21.4 (IQR 15.9 to 30), and the median VASa was 3.5 (IQR 2 to 5). An olecranon osteotomy was used in 86% of cases and an anatomic plate was used for fixation of the osteotomy in 94% of those cases. There were three cases of olecranon plate removal for a rate across the series of 13.7%. DISCUSSION: Our short-term results demonstrate satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of revision for distal humerus fracture fixed with a linking beam. Further, the rate of removal for the olecranon osteotomy plate was lower than historical reports for aggregate methods of osteotomy fixation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Revision of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) may be indicated in cases of prosthesis loosening and malposition. Inherent difficulties in revision surgery include poor bone stock and disrupted soft tissue envelope. Although cases of RHA used for revision of failed RHA are rare, there is reasonable expectation for increasing frequency of these cases due to the increasing incidence of primary RHA. Furthermore, there is an increasing demand for postoperative recovery of function; thus, surgeons may consider revising a failed RHA to a new RHA. We report on series of failed RHA which were revised to a new radial head prosthesis. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at multiple institutions for a single radial head prosthesis used for revision of a failed radial head prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Across 11 patients at a mean follow-up of 45.1 months, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 81.7; mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 24.4; and mean Visual Analog Scale for pain was 0.6. Radiographic analysis yielded no evidence of capitellar wear or stem loosening. CONCLUSION: A radial head prosthesis can produce satisfactory results when used for revision of a failed prosthesis. Inherent difficulties in revision surgery include the potential for reduced bone stock and a disrupted soft tissue envelope. Elements of prosthesis design which may contribute to effectively managing revision surgery include a long stem with in-growth surface and prosthetic head alignment to the axis of forearm rotation.
RESUMO
Chronic nonunions of the humerus remain a challenging problem. We reviewed 13 cases of chronic nonunion of the humerus resulting from trauma or osteomyelitis treated with vascularized fibula transfer after failure of conventional treatment. Patient averages were 35 years of age, follow-up of 19 months, and 4.2 prior operations. Healing was obtained in 12 of 13 (92%) patients with an average healing time of 18 weeks and graft length of 12.5 cm. In total, 11 of 12 (91%) patients who united had good to excellent range of motion of their shoulder and elbow. There were eight complications in 7 of 13 patients (54%). Two patients developed fractures of the graft, and three had superficial infections at the harvest site requiring operative debridement. Two patients had median neurapraxia that resolved by 4 months. Two patients complained of intermittent pain at the donor site. No significant correlations were found between time to heal and other covariates.
