Perceptions on Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Children Under 2 Years by Community Pediatricians: A Focus Group Study.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition and is undertreated in children under 2 years, whom there are no specific guidelines for. We sought to understand barriers to AD treatment and primary care pediatricians' (PCPs) suggested solutions. We conducted semi-structured focus groups (n = 5) with PCPs (n = 17) on how the undertreatment of AD can be addressed. Data were analyzed using an inductive qualitative approach. Participants noted that the perceived undertreatment of AD in children under 2 years could be explained by topical corticosteroid (TCS) use hesitancy, lack of caregiver adherence to PCP recommendations, and under-documentation of AD in the electronic medical record (EMR). Proposed suggestions for improving AD management included caregiver and PCP education on TCS safety; stepwise management guidelines for this age group; and EMR aids to help document and manage AD. Research is warranted to create and disseminate clinician-friendly AD management guidelines for this age group.

Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Children Younger Than Two Years of Age by Community Pediatricians: A Survey and Chart Review.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize primary care providers' (PCPs) practice patterns for atopic dermatitis (AD) in children <2 years old and determine the need for AD guidelines for PCPs focused on this age group. STUDY DESIGN: This is a mixed-methods study consisting of a survey and a retrospective medical record review of PCP practices in the Chicago metropolitan area. The survey was analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: In the survey (n = 52 respondents), PCPs reported management of AD is different in children <2 years compared with older children (88%). They were more likely to refer to a specialist (65%) and less likely to use high-potency topical corticosteroids (64%). In the chart review, PCP visits for children 2-5 years old (n = 50 914) vs those <2 years old (n = 71 913) for AD, older children had medium- and high-potency topical corticosteroids prescribed more frequently than younger children (0.66% vs 0.37%, P < .01 and .15% vs 0.05%, P < .01, respectively). In the subset of children <2 years of age who also were evaluated by a specialist (n = 109), medium- and high-potency topical corticosteroids were prescribed disproportionately at visits to providers in dermatology (57%) vs allergy (30%) vs pediatrics (15%) (P < .01). PCPs suggested that guidelines for this age group should include recommendations for preferred corticosteroids (39%), allergy management (35%), referral criteria (22%), and assessment of disease severity (11%). CONCLUSIONS: PCP management of AD in children <2 years is different from older children, with possible underuse of medium/high-potency topical corticosteroids. Clear guidelines for this age group are needed.

Does History of Prematurity Prompt Blood Pressure Evaluations at Primary Care Visits?

Prematurity is a risk factor for elevated blood pressure (BP). We performed a mixed-methods study of care patterns and awareness of early BP screening recommendations for infants born prematurely (IBP) by interviewing/surveying providers on practice- and provider-level BP screening. IBP's records were reviewed for BP screening documentation, demographics, and gestational age (GA). Visits <33 months were reviewed for anthropometrics, BP, and comorbidities. Chi-square analysis evaluated BP screening by GA and comorbidities. Twenty-six of 49 practices completed interviews; 81% had infant BP equipment available; 4% had BP measurement protocol for IBP. Twenty-eight of 86 providers were aware of screening guidelines; none reported routine assessment. Twenty-eight of 118 IBP had ≥1 BP documented; 43% had BP ≥90th percentile. Screening did not differ by GA group. Kidney-related diagnosis was associated with more frequent BP screening (P = .0454). BP is not routinely measured though often elevated before age 3 in IBP.

Latino community-based participatory research studies: a model for conducting bilingual translations.

Many behavioral health materials have not been translated into Spanish. Of those that are available in Spanish, some of them have not been translated correctly, many are only appropriate for a subgroup of Latinos, and/or multiple versions of the same materials exist. This article describes an innovative model of conducting bilingual English-Spanish translations as part of community-based participatory research studies and provides recommendations based on this model. In this article, the traditional process of conducting bilingual translations is reviewed, and an innovative model for conducting translations in collaboration with community partners is described. Finally, recommendations for conducting future health research studies with community partners are provided. Researchers, health care providers, educators, and community partners will benefit from learning about this innovative model that helps produce materials that are more culturally appropriate than those that are produced with the most commonly used method of conducting translations.