RESUMO
Introduction: COVID-19 pneumonia results in an impairment of the diaphragmatic musculature that influences the development of respiratory failure during the patient's hospitalization. Diaphragmatic ultrasound is a useful, non-invasive, and accessible tool for measuring the function of this muscle. Objective: Assessing the morphological and functional ultrasound status of the diaphragm in patients admitted within the first 24 h for COVID-related pneumonia and its association with hospital morbidity and mortality (NCT05805579). Material and methods: Observational, prospective cohort study that included 68 patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia with respiratory failure. Diaphragmatic ultrasound was performed within the first 24 h of admission to the pulmonology ward. Clinical, analytical, and ultrasound variables were collected: excursion, thickness, and diaphragmatic shortening fraction (DSF). DSF < 20% was used to define diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD). Patients who showed favorable progression and were managed on the ward (HCONV) were compared to those who required admission to the respiratory monitoring unit (RMU). Results: A total of 68 patients were included, of which 22 (32.35%) were admitted to the RMU. Diaphragmatic excursion at maximum volume was higher in the HCONV group compared to the RMU group (58.41 ± 17.83 vs. 50.03 ± 16.23; p = 0.123). Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) was observed in 21 (30.88%) patients, with a higher prevalence in the RMU group than in the HCONV group (15 (68.18%) vs. 6 (13.04%); p = 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, age and DSF at admission were the best predictors of failure to discharge. Conclusions: Performing diaphragmatic ultrasound to assess mobility and DSF within the first 24 h of admission for COVID-19 pneumonia proves valuable in determining short-term progression and the need for admission to a respiratory monitoring unit.
Introducción: La neumonía por COVID-19 provoca un deterioro de la musculatura diafragmática que influye en la aparición de insuficiencia respiratoria durante la hospitalización del paciente. La ecografía diafragmática es una técnica no invasiva accesible y útil para medir la función de este músculo. Objetivo: Evaluar mediante ecografía el estado funcional y morfológico del diafragma en pacientes con neumonía por COVID durante las primeras 24 h de su ingreso y su asociación con la morbimortalidad intrahospitalaria (NCT05805579). Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo y observacional de una cohorte compuesta por 68 pacientes ingresados por neumonía por COVID-19 con insuficiencia respiratoria. La ecografía diafragmática se practicó durante las 24 h siguientes al ingreso en la planta de neumología. Se recopilaron variables clínicas, analíticas y ecográficas: desplazamiento, grosor y fracción de acortamiento diafragmático (FAD). Se utilizó una FAD < 20% como definición de disfunción diafragmática. Se comparó a los pacientes que evolucionaron favorablemente y recibieron tratamiento en planta (hospitalización convencional) con los pacientes que tuvieron que ser ingresados en la unidad de monitorización respiratoria (UMR). Resultados: Se incluyó en el estudio a un total de 68 pacientes, de los cuales 22 ingresaron en la UMR (el 32,35%). El desplazamiento diafragmático con el volumen máximo fue más alto en el grupo de hospitalización convencional que en el grupo ingresado en UMR (58,41 ± 17,83 frente a 50,03 ± 16,23; p = 0,123). Presentaron disfunción diafragmática 21 pacientes (30,88%) y la prevalencia fue más alta en el grupo ingresado en UMR que en el de hospitalización convencional: 15 pacientes (68,18%) frente a 6 (13,04%); p = 0,0001. En el análisis multivariable, la edad y la FAD al ingreso son los factores que mejor predicen la imposibilidad del alta. Conclusiones: La ecografía diafragmática para evaluar la movilidad y la FAD en las primeras 24 h del ingreso por neumonía por COVID-19 resulta valiosa para determinar la evolución a corto plazo y la necesidad de ingreso en una unidad de monitorización respiratoria.
RESUMO
Background: The concept of clinical control has been proposed as an instrument for evaluating patients with COPD. However, the possible association between clinical control, reduced symptom severity and HRQoL has yet to be confirmed. Methods: This multicentre, prospective and observational study was carried out in 15 pulmonology clinics in Spain. The patients were followed up for six months, with a baseline visit (V0), followed by visits at three months (V1) and six months (V2). Clinical control was determined at V1, with the application of both clinical criteria and the COPD assessment test (CAT). All patients reported their symptoms by a validated symptom diary (E-RS) using a portable device, and their HRQoL was assessed using the EQ5D questionnaire. The relationship between clinical control and E-RS and HRQoL during follow-up was assessed with t-test. Results: A total of 126 patients were screened. After application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 93 were finally included (mean age 66 ± 8 years, 84.9% male), with a mean FEV1 predicted of 49.8% ± 16.5%. Of these patients, 44 (47.3%) achieved clinical control at V1, according to CAT criteria, and 50 (53.8%), according to clinical criteria. The E-RS scores differed between controlled and uncontrolled patients at all time points, both according to CAT (mean differences of -4.6, -5.6 and -6.2 units at V0, V1 and V2, respectively, p<0.005 for all comparisons) and to clinical criteria (mean differences of -3.3, -5-6 and -4.99 units, respectively, p<0.005 for all comparisons). The controlled patients also presented a significantly better HRQoL, measured by the EQ5D questionnaire (mean difference 0.13 and 0.10 at V2 by CAT or clinical criteria, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusion: Clinical control in patients with COPD, whether measured by CAT or by clinical criteria, is associated with a lower symptom load and a better HRQoL.
