The association of leg length and offset reconstruction after total hip arthroplasty with clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Restoring native hip anatomy and biomechanics is important to create a well-functioning hip arthroplasty. This study investigated the association of hip offset and leg length after hip arthroplasty with clinical outcomes, including patient reported outcome measures, the Trendelenburg Test and gait analysis. METHODS: In 77 patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (age mean = 65 SD = 11 years; BMI mean = 27 SD = 5 kg/m2), hip offset and leg length discrepancy were measured on anteroposterior radiographs. The Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Trendelenburg Test and gait were assessed preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. An inertial measurement unit was used to derive biomechanical parameters, including spatiotemporal gait parameters and tilt angles of the pelvis. Relationships between radiographic and functional outcomes were investigated, and subgroups of patients with >15% decreased and increased femoral offset were analysed separately. FINDINGS: Patient-reported function scores and clinical tests demonstrated a few significant, weak correlations with radiographic outcomes (Spearman's ρ range = 0.26-0.32; p < 0.05). Undercorrection of femoral offset was associated with lower patient-reported function scores and with more step irregularity as well as step asymmetry during gait. Postoperative leg length inequality was associated with increased frontal plane tilt angle of the pelvis during the Trendelenburg Test and increased sagittal plane motion of the pelvis during gait. Femoral offset subgroups demonstrated no significant differences for patient-reported function scores and outcomes of the Trendelenburg Test and gait analysis. INTERPRETATION: Reduced hip offset and leg length discrepancy following hip arthroplasty seem to be marginally associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Validation of a novel activity monitor in impaired, slow-walking, crutch-supported patients.

BACKGROUND: A growing need in clinical practice of rehabilitation and orthopaedic medicine is for objective outcome tools to estimate physical activity. Current techniques show limited validity or are too demanding for routine clinical use. Accelerometer-based activity monitors (AMs) have shown promise for measuring physical activity in healthy people but lack validity in impaired patients. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate an accelerometer-based AM in impaired, slow-walking, crutch-supported patients after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: Shortly after TJA, patients who were safely mobilized with 2 crutches and 8 healthy participants completed a trial of different activities while wearing the AM on the lateral upper leg and being videotaped. Outcome variables (e.g., time walking, number of gait cycles, sit-stand-sit transfers) were compared to video recordings, and sensitivity, predictive value and mean percentage difference (MPD) values were calculated. RESULTS: We included 40 patients (mean age: 65±9 years; mean BMI: 30±6kg/m2; male:female ratio: 18:22) and 8 healthy participants (mean age: 49±20 years; mean BMI: 23±0.7kg/m2; male:female ratio: 5:3). The AM showed excellent sensitivity (>95%) and predictive value (>95%) in identifying activities (e.g., walking, sitting, resting) and detecting the number of gait cycles and sit-stand-sit transfers (mean percentage difference: ±2%). Detection of number of steps ascending and descending stairs and cadence was more difficult but still showed good results (mean percentage difference: ±7%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first validation study to assess physical activity with an AM in impaired, slow-walking, crutch-supported patients. The AM was a valid tool for measuring physical activity in these patients. The tool may help in evaluating and optimizing rehabilitation programs for patients after TJA, those recovering from stroke or chronic impaired patients.

Frontal plane pelvic motion during gait captures hip osteoarthritis related disability.

Gait analysis has widely been accepted as an objective measure of function and clinical outcome. Ambulatory accelerometer-based gait analysis has emerged as a clinically more feasible alternative to optical motion capture systems but does not provide kinematic characterisation to identify disease dependent mechanisms causing walking disability. This study investigated the potential of a single inertial sensor to derive frontal plane motion of the pelvis (i.e. pelvic obliquity) and help identify hip osteoarthritis (OA) related gait alterations. Patients with advanced unilateral hip OA (n = 20) were compared to patients with advanced unilateral knee OA (n = 20) and to a healthy control group (n = 20). Kinematic characterisation of frontal plane pelvic motion during gait demonstrated decreased range of motion and increased asymmetry for hip OA patients specifically.