Dental rehabilitation in irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants - Clinical outcome and oral health-related quality of life.

INTRODUCTION: Dental rehabilitation in oral cancer patients is essential for good oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Patient-specific dental implants are suitable for treating tumor-related bony defects, resulting in satisfactory OHRQoL. However, knowledge concerning the clinical outcome and OHRQoL following tumor irradiation is lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate clinical outcomes and OHRQoL in eight patients who received patient-specific dental implants and implant-supported dentures after surgical treatment for oral cancer with additional irradiation. OHRQoL assessment was performed using the German long version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP) questionnaire (OHIP-G53). RESULTS: Clinical examination revealed successful dental rehabilitation in all the patients with only minor impairments. Restricted stability and function of implants were not observed. OHIP sum-scores of all the patients indicated acceptable OHRQoL, but this varied between patients treated in the upper or lower jaw. Single-item sum-scores concerning the adverse events "difficulty in chewing," "food catching," "sore jaw," "sore spots," and "unclear speech" were detected to be the worst, and pain-related OHIP dimensions demonstrated the highest scores (followed by functional limitation, physical disability, and psychosocial impact) with a worse OHRQoL following lower jaw treatment. Other dimension sum-scores were overall lower and nearly equally distributed in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dental rehabilitation of irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants may be suitable, leading to acceptable OHRQoL. However, implant insertion in the upper jaw seems to be more favorable. Further studies on patient-specific dental implants are warranted to validate the current results.

Intertemporal choice in Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease are a potential consequence of dopaminergic therapy. Impulse control problems might be revealed by intertemporal choice tasks which entail to forgo an immediately available reward in favor of a larger but later reward. The steepness of the discounting curve can be quantified by the parameter k. METHODS: Participants (37 Parkinson patients [13 de novo, 24 medicated], 24 patients with restless legs syndrome, and 22 controls) were offered 54 choices between immediate smaller rewards and delayed larger and the k value was estimated from the participants' responses. Participants had the chance of winning one of their decisions. None of the participants had impulse control disorders. RESULTS: Unmedicated Parkinson patients had a higher discounting rate than controls and medicated patients with restless legs syndrome. The k values of medicated Parkinson patients and patients with restless legs syndrome did not differ from those of controls. No correlation was found between the k value and the dopamine agonist dose. CONCLUSION: Impulsive decision making in patients with Parkinson's disease may occur as part of the disease rather than as a consequence of dopamine agonist therapy.