Cannabis oil extracts for chronic pain: what else can be learned from another structured prospective cohort?

Introduction: The use of medicinal cannabis for managing pain expands, although its efficacy and safety have not been fully established through randomized controlled trials. Objectives: This structured, prospective questionnaire-based cohort was aimed to assess long-term effectiveness and safety of cannabis oil extracts in patients with chronic pain. Methods: Adult Israeli patients licensed to use cannabis oil extracts for chronic pain were followed prospectively for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in average weekly pain intensity, and secondary outcomes were changes in related symptoms and quality of life, recorded before treatment initiation and 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter. Generalized linear mixed model was used to analyze changes over time. In addition, "responders" (≥30% reduction in weekly pain at any time point) were identified. Results: The study included 218 patients at baseline, and 188, 154, and 131 at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. At 6 months, the mean daily doses of cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol were 22.4 ± 24.0 mg and 20.8 ± 30.1 mg, respectively. Pain decreased from 7.9 ± 1.7 at baseline to 6.6 ± 2.2 at 6 months (F(3,450) = 26.22, P < 0.0001). Most secondary parameters also significantly improved. Of the 218 participants, 24% were "responders" but could not be identified by baseline parameters. "Responders" exhibited higher improvement in secondary outcomes. Adverse events were common but mostly nonserious. Conclusion: This prospective cohort demonstrated a modest overall long-term improvement in chronic pain and related symptoms and a reasonable safety profile with the use of relatively low doses of individually titrated Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol.

Association of Receipt of the Fourth BNT162b2 Dose With Omicron Infection and COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Residents of Long-term Care Facilities.

Importance: The administration of a fourth BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine dose was approved in Israel in December 2021 for individuals 60 years or older who were vaccinated with a third dose 4 months previously or earlier to control the substantial surge of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Nonetheless, the association between receipt of the fourth dose and protection against infection remains elusive. Objective: To determine the association of the fourth BNT162b2 dose with protection against SARS-CoV-2-related infections, hospitalizations, and deaths during the Omicron surge in long-term care facility (LTCF) residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Israel between January 10 and March 31, 2022 and included LTCF residents 60 years or older. Exposures: Vaccination with the fourth dose of BNT162b2 vs 3 doses that were administered 4 months previously or earlier. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cumulative incidences of SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths during the Omicron surge. The follow-up was initiated more than 7 days after receipt of the fourth dose, which was matched to the follow-up initiation date of those who had received 3 doses of vaccine in each facility. We obtained hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals from multivariable Cox regression models. Results: The data of 43 775 residents (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [9.4] years; 29 679 women [67.8%]) were analyzed, of whom 24 088 (55.0%) and 19 687 (45.0%) received the fourth and third dose (4 months previously or earlier), respectively. The median follow-up time was 73 days (4-dose group: IQR, 6 days; 3-dose group: IQR, 56 days). More than 7 days postvaccination with the fourth dose, SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected among 4058 fourth-dose vs 4370 third-dose recipients (cumulative incidence, 17.6% vs 24.9%). The corresponding incidences of hospitalizations for mild-to-moderate COVID-19, severe illness, and mortality were 0.9% and 2.8%, 0.5% and 1.5%, and 0.2% and 0.5%, respectively. The adjusted protections were 34% (95% CI, 30%-37%), 64% (95% CI, 56%-71%), and 67% (95% CI, 57%-75%) against overall infection, hospitalizations for mild-to-moderate illness, and severe illness, respectively, and 72% (95% CI, 57%-83%) against related deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that receipt of a fourth BNT162b2 dose conferred high protection against COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths among LTCF residents during a substantial Omicron variant surge, but protection was modest against infection. These findings are relevant to the control of COVID-19 pandemic globally, especially among the population of LTCFs.

Underwater trauma causes a long-term specific increase in the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in the ventral CA1 of the hippocampus.

The pro-inflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is regularly expressed in the hippocampal neurons, but its role in emotional trauma is not known. Here we show that a single acute stress caused by a near-drowning experience results in heightened anxiety-like behavior one month after the trauma. Biochemical analyses of dorsal and ventral hippocampal CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus revealed decreased ubiquitination and elevated levels of COX-2 in the traumatized animals only in the ventral CA1. To reveal the identity of the ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets COX-2, we tested the effect of several representative E3 ligases on COX-2 expression in vitro. We found that while AIP4 and Nedd4 had no effect, Mdm2 lowered COX-2 expression by nearly 50%, an effect that was not observed by its dominant negative form. To test whether this also occurs in the hippocampus, we immunoprecipitated Mdm2 from dorsal and ventral CA1 of traumatized and control animals and probed for the presence of COX-2. Our results showed that the levels of Mdm2 were not affected by the trauma but there was significantly less COX-2 associated with Mdm2 in the ventral but not dorsal CA1 of the traumatized animals. Together these data propose that an increase in COX-2 expression in ventral CA1 following trauma is likely due to its attenuated degradation. Unraveling the pathways and mechanisms that control hippocampal COX-2 degradation is important to boost the development of novel therapeutic approaches designed to treat stress-related pathologies.