Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Heart J ; 142(3): 466-75, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11526360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peak exercise oxygen consumption (peak VO2) is an important discriminator of survival in patients with systolic heart failure and is used to select ambulatory patients for transplantation. The major trials assessing the relationship between peak VO2 and survival have used a variety of low-level exercise protocols. It is unknown how peak VO2 measured in this patient population by the more vigorous Bruce treadmill protocol compares with that obtained on less intense protocols. METHODS: We studied 15 patients (50 +/- 12 years old) with severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction 23.5% +/- 8.6%). Patients randomly performed 3 exercise tests with the Bruce treadmill, modified Naughton treadmill, and modified bicycle protocols within 14 days. To determine the ability of this patient population to perform the Bruce protocol, we also retrospectively analyzed the ability of 84 patients to perform this test on their initial evaluations at our center. RESULTS: All patients reached the anaerobic threshold (AT) on all 3 protocols. The Bruce and modified Naughton treadmill protocols resulted in similar peak VO2 percent predicted peak VO2, and VO2 at AT values (17.7 +/- 3.8 mL/kg/min, 57.2% +/- 21.1% and 15.4 +/- 4.1 mL/kg/min vs 18.0 +/- 4.7 mL/kg/min, 58.1% +/- 22.5% and 15.6 +/- 4.4 mL/kg/min, respectively). Peak VO2 and VO2 at AT on both treadmill protocols were higher than those obtained with bicycle testing (15.3 +/- 3.1 and 11.8 +/- 3.0 mL/kg/min, P <.05). Exercise duration was shorter with the Bruce and bicycle protocols (6.2 +/- 2.2 and 6.7 +/- 2.4 minutes, respectively) compared with the modified Naughton protocol (9.7 +/- 4.3 minutes, both P <.005). In addition, 79 of the 84 patients (94%) evaluated were able to complete the Bruce protocol and reach AT. CONCLUSIONS: The Bruce protocol was more time efficient than the modified Naughton protocol and yielded similar peak VO2, percent predicted peak VO2, and VO2 at AT values. Bicycle exercise may underestimate peak VO2 values. The form of exercise should be considered when assessing peak VO2 criteria for transplant listing.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Transplante de Coração , Consumo de Oxigênio , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr ; 13(8): 771-3, 2000 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10936821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine whether contrast adds diagnostic value to both fundamental and native tissue harmonic imaging (NTHI) for endocardial border definition. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent stress echocardiography imaging were studied in either fundamental (n = 52) or NTHI mode (n = 148) with an Acuson Sequoia echocardiographic system. Contrast agent (Optison) was administered (0.5 to 1 mL) for enhancement of endocardial borders. Two- and 4-chamber views were analyzed before and after administration of contrast at peak stress for grading of 5 endocardial border segments. Scores from 0 to 5 were assigned to each study for all the images both before and after contrast (0 = 0 segments completely visualized; 5 = 5 segments completely visualized). RESULTS: The use of Optison contrast significantly enhanced border definition when imaging was performed in either fundamental or NTHI mode. Addition of contrast resulted in better endocardial border definition in fundamental mode (4.1 + or - 1.0 versus 2.3 + or - 1.3, P <.001). However, in NTHI mode, the presence of contrast resulted in enhanced definition of endocardial border compared with its absence (4.8 + or - 0.5 versus 3.3 + or - 1.1, P <.001). The combination of NTHI and contrast resulted in more visualization of endocardium when compared with the combination of fundamental imaging and contrast (4.8 + or - 0.5 versus 4.1 + or - 1.0, P <.001). In addition, interobserver agreement for border detection increased from 83% in fundamental mode without contrast to 95% with the use of NTHI with Optison (P <.001). CONCLUSION: As defined in 200 cases, the combination of NTHI with Optison contrast results in nearly complete and consistent endocardial border definition.


Assuntos
Albuminas , Meios de Contraste , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Endocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluorocarbonos , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Albuminas/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fluorocarbonos/administração & dosagem , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Microesferas , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...