Influence of the medical treatment schedule in new diagnoses patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend treating all patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with quadruple therapy, although they do not establish how to start it. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of these recommendations, analyzing the efficacy and safety of the different therapeutic schedules. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, observational, and multicenter registry that evaluated the treatment initiated in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF and its evolution at 3 months. Clinical and analytical data were collected, as well as adverse reactions and events during follow-up. Five hundred and thirty-three patients were included, selecting four hundred and ninety-seven, aged 65.5 ± 12.9 years (72% male). The most frequent etiologies were ischemic (25.5%) and idiopathic (21.1%), with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 28.7 ± 7.4%. Quadruple therapy was started in 314 (63.2%) patients, triple in 120 (24.1%), and double in 63 (12.7%). Follow-up was 112 days [IQI 91; 154], with 10 (2%) patients dying. At 3 months, 78.5% had quadruple therapy (p < 0.001). There were no differences in achieving maximum doses or reducing or withdrawing drugs (< 6%) depending on the starting scheme. Twenty-seven (5.7%) patients had any emergency room visits or admission for HF, less frequent in those with quadruple therapy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: It is possible to achieve quadruple therapy in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF early. This strategy makes it possible to reduce admissions and visits to the emergency room for HF without associating a more significant reduction or withdrawal of drugs or significant difficulty in achieving the target doses.

Analysis of the Intrahospital and Long-Term Survival of Heart Transplant Patients With a Short-Term Mechanical Assistance Device.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare early and late survival among patients who have undergone heart transplantation (HTx) with a short-term mechanical assist device. METHODS: This was an ambispective, single-center, consecutive study of patients undergoing urgent HTx for 5 years. Pediatric transplants, retransplants, and combined transplants were excluded. Forty-five patients were included. Four groups were analyzed: those with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implanted <10 days before HTx; those with ECMO implanted for >10 days; patients classified as INTERMACS 2 to 3 with Levitronix Centrimag implanted; and those classified as INTERMACS 2 with Levitronix Centrimag implanted. Survival and the influence of orotracheal intubation (OI) at the time of transplantation were compared. RESULTS: There were differences in in-hospital mortality (P = .03) and total mortality (P = .06). The groups with the highest risk for mortality were those who carried ECMO for >10 days before transplantation or those classified as INTERMACS 2 with Levitronix Centrimag implanted. In these groups, the need for posttransplant circulatory support was also greater (P = .04) as was the length of stay in critical care (P = .02). The need for OI during the days of care and until transplantation had a negative effect on survival in all groups (P < .1). CONCLUSIONS: There are different risk subgroups among patients who are transplanted with a circulatory/ventricular assist device. The lowest mortality occurs when the days of ECMO implantation are <10 and when the implanted device is a Levitronix Centrimag in INTERMACS 2 to 3 profile, particularly when the patient reaches the HTx without requiring OI.

COVID-19 and Heart Transplantation. Initial Experience in a Tertiary Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus that is affecting the entire world population. The objective of this study was to analyze the repercussion of the disease in a group of patients at risk such as heart transplant recipients. METHODS: From February 2020 to February 2021, heart transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 were consecutively included. The total number of transplant recipients in outpatient follow-up at that time was 381. Three levels of infection were determined: group A: asymptomatic patients or with trivial symptoms without the need for hospital admission (6 patients); group B: patients admitted to the hospital for respiratory symptoms (12 patients); and group C: patients with severe symptoms and need for admission to the critical care unit (2 patients). At each risk level, medical performance was different: group A: close control, no therapeutic modification; group B: reduction of calcineurin inhibitor and substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for everolimus; group C: reduction of calcineurin inhibitor and withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: The prevalence of infection in the series was 5.2%. Most patients admitted had a pathologic chest x-ray with fever, cough, dyspnea, or vomiting. The change in immunosuppression performed in patients in group 2 was well tolerated and there was no graft rejection. Antiviral treatment was little used. However, boluses of steroids and some antibiotics were used frequently. The need for supplemental oxygen was 50% in group 2 and 100% in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of transplant recipients will be affected by COVID-19 (5.3%). Management of the infection will depend on the severity of the infection and must be based on a balance between reduction and adjustment of immunosuppression, strict control of the cardiologic situation, and treatment of the infection.

Usefulness of Immunoglobulin A in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure: Is It a Future Marker of Congestion? Preliminary Experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the level of IgA is related to right ventricular function and systemic congestion in patients with decompensated heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: This was a consecutive prospective and observational study of hospitalized patients diagnosed with decompensated HF with reduced EF. The recruitment period lasted 2 months. In the first 24 hours after admission, clinical assessment, general laboratory tests, determination of HF biomarkers, IgA and echocardiographic study were performed. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to whether the plasma IgA level was lower (n = 11) or higher than 300 mg/dL (n = 12). RESULTS: Significant differences in IgA levels were found in the peripheral congestion variables (no congestion: 232, interquartile range [IQR], 125-310 mg/dL vs congestion: 429, IQR, 308-520 mg/dL; P = .03). There were also differences in echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular function, with a greater deterioration of right ventricular function in the group with higher IgA levels (P < .05). There was a highly significant correlation between tricuspid annulus systolic excursion values and IgA levels (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In decompensated HF, patients with greater clinical congestion and echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular dysfunction have higher plasma IgA levels. This study is a preliminary experience that will help to establish the basis of the cardiointestinal syndrome as a clinical picture of systemic congestion in HF.

Utility of the Biomarker CA125 in the Diagnosis of Cellular Rejection in Allogeneic Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the relationship of the antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) biomarker with the cellular rejection of the heart graft during the first year after transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective study of consecutive heart transplant (HTx) patients for 1.5 years. The total number of patients included in the study was 23 with a total of 103 follow-ups. In all patients, CA125 was determined before HTx and determined post-HTx in every follow-up. These were performed during months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed in all revisions to assess the degree of graft rejection in the pathologic study. The biopsy results were grouped into 1. absence of rejection and 2. presence of some degree of rejection. RESULTS: The mean pretransplant CA125 value presented a median of 120 U/mL with an interquartile range of 28.8 U/mL. One month after transplantation, the value was reduced by 20% and at 2 months by 81%. In subsequent reviews, plasma values were always between 10 and 20 U/mL. When comparing the values by periods and according to the presence or absence of rejection, no significant differences were found other than a slight elevation at the 6-month checkup (P = .03) but without clinical relevance, because the CA125 value was slightly higher in biopsy results without rejection. CONCLUSION: The rapid reduction of CA125 corroborates its usefulness as a marker of congestion in heart failure. This biomarker is not useful for predicting rejection. However, in cases of very severe rejections that occurred with systemic congestion, it could be raised. It would be necessary to corroborate this hypothesis in a larger study with a higher number of severe rejections.

Complications After Heart Transplantation According to the Type of Pretransplant Circulatory/Ventricular Support.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to analyze postcardiac transplant complications in patients who received transplants with short-term mechanical ventricular assist devices and to compare complications according to the type of device. METHODS: Ambispective and consecutive study of urgent heart transplants from 2015 to 2019. Pediatric transplants, retransplants, and combined transplants were excluded. A total of 45 patients were analyzed in 4 groups: (1) venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implanted <10 days before heart transplant (HTx) (n = 17); (2) ECMO implanted for more than 10 days (n = 8); (3) Levitronix Centrimag implanted in INTERMACS 2 to 3 patients (n = 13); and (4) Levitronix Centrimag implanted in INTERMACS 2 patients (n = 7). ECMO assistance was in INTERMACS 2 and severe right ventricular dysfunction. Levitronix Centrimag was implanted in patients with preserved right ventricular function. RESULTS: Primary graft failure associated with the need for ECMO was more frequent in patients with ECMO than with Levitronix (P < .05). When comparing the 2 groups with ECMO, an implant more than 10 days before HTx was associated, after transplant, with a longer stay in the critical care unit (P = .02), higher mortality (P = .03), and an increase in complications in general. When comparing the 2 groups with Levitronix, all the parameters studied were much better when the Levitronix was implanted in INTERMACS 2-3 (P < .05). On the other hand, all cases of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in patients who were assisted with ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: HTx with mechanical assist devices is associated with significant complications. ECMO produces more complications than the Levitronix Centrimag, although they are related to the days of implantation. The best group are patients implanted with a Levitronix in INTERMACS 2-3.

Transient pulmonary nodules with halo sign in patients with advanced heart failure: a report of two cases.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Imaging is important in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with heart failure (HF). Several thoracic radiological features have been described in these patients. The nodules with halo sign are very rarely reported in HF patients. This sign can appear in several diseases and a clinical context is essential for a final diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present two immunocompetent patients with advanced HF waiting for cardiac transplantation showing multiple transient lung nodules with halo sign on preoperative chest CT. RESULTS: Our patients showed mild interstitial pulmonary edema and more interestingly multiple transient pulmonary nodules with halo sign. These nodules didn't coalesce, they even appear and disappear rapidly during worsening of pulmonary edema and showed thick halos. Nodules with halo sign are rarely reported in heart failure and considered focal pulmonary edema. CONCLUSION: Nodules with halo sign in patients with advanced heart failure are a not usual finding that could not be the result of focal pulmonary edema, but of hemorrhage.

Intravenous sildenafil in right ventricular dysfunction with pulmonary hypertension following a heart transplant.

The objective of the present work is to describe the experience with intravenous (IV) sildenafil in heart transplant (HT) patients with reactive pulmonary hypertension (PH) who developed right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in the immediate postoperative period. The first 5 patients who received IV sildenafil followinga HT are presented. The HTs took place between March 2011 and September 2012 in patients aged 37 to 64 years; all patients were male. Prior to the HT, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 32-56 mmHg. In all cases, the hemodynamic study demonstrated PH reactivity (positive vasodilator test with nitric oxide). All 5 patients developed RVD with hemodynamic instability immediately after the HT, despite the administration of nitric oxide from the time of intubation prior to the implant, optimal medical treatment in all cases, and a ventricular assist in 2 cases. In all patients, IV sildenafil was initiated at 10 mg/8 h for 48 h and was subsequently increased to 20 mg/8 h. in its oral formulation until discharge from the hospital. The change in pulmonary pressure was assessed using a Swan-Ganz catheter. Ventricular function was assessed using echocardiography. Length of stay in the Resuscitation Unit and mid-term survival were also assessed. Average time of extracorporeal circulation was 200 ± 110 min and organ ischemic time was 210 ± 95 min. All of the patients demonstrated pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic improvement, as well as recovery of right ventricular function after completing the treatment with IV sildenafil. The stay in the Resuscitation Unit lasted 3-25 days. All the patients were discharged from hospital with no mortality to date. Intravenous sildenafil improves right ventricle hemodynamics associated with pulmonary hypertension post-HT. Prophylactic prevention with this drug could be indicated for patients with reactive PH who are about to receive a transplant.

Inflamación y disfunción endotelial en la insuficiencia cardíaca aguda y crónica / Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in chronic and acute heart failure / Inflamação e disfunção endotelial na insuficiência cardíaca aguda e crônica

Introducción. En la insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) existe una importante activación neurohormonal e inflamatoria. También parece existir una disfunción endotelial. Nuestro objetivo ha sido comparar ambos procesos (inflamación y disfunción endotelial) en pacientes con IC. Material y métodos. Comparamos marcadores de disfunción endotelial (células endoteliales circulantes, macropartículas circulantes y factor von Willebrand) y de inflamación (proteína C reactiva, interleuquina 6 y fibrinógeno funcional) en 16 pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda (ICA), 16 con insuficiencia cardíaca crónica (ICC) estable y 32 controles sanos. Resultados. El número de células endoteliales circulantes fue mayor en los pacientes con ICA que en el grupo ICC y que en el grupo control (115,10 ± 63,44 vs 19,67 ± 3,17 vs 11,71 ± 2,92 cel/mL). La cantidad de macropartículas circulantes fue mayor en el grupo ICA que en el ICC y en ambos grupos frente al grupo control (9.627 ± 4.986 vs 3.970 ± 3.452 vs 1.371 ± 739 p/µL). El factor von Willebrand fue mayor en ambos grupos IC que en el control (234,3 ± 45,31 vs 245,92 ± 117,89 vs 100,14 ± 20,7%). Los valores de proteína C reactiva fueron mayores en el grupo ICA que en el ICC y que en el control (20,29 ± 17,56 vs 7,65 ± 4,27 vs 1,44 ± 1,10 mg/dL). La interleuquina 6 se encontró más elevada en los pacientes con ICA respecto al resto de grupos y en los pacientes con ICC respecto a los sanos (9,73 ± 9,37 vs 1,69 ± 1,36 vs 1,01 ± 1,09 pg/mL). Referente al fibrinógeno funcional, sólo encontramos diferencias significativas entre el grupo ICA y el resto de grupos (350 ± 60,48 vs 264,08 ± 67,02 vs 254,29 ± 23,69 mg/dL). Conclusiones. De forma paralela a la inflamación ya conocida en la IC, se produce una disfunción endotelial que a su vez parece ser proporcional a la gravedad de la IC.

Background. There is a neurohormonal an inflammatory activation in heart failure. There is also an endothelial dysfunction. Our objective war to compare both processes (inflammation and endothelial dysfunction) in patients with heart failure. Material and method. We compared endothelial dysfunction markers (circulating endothelial cells, circulating microparticles and Von Willebrand factor) and inflammatory markers (C reactive protein, interleukin-6 and functional fibrinogen) in 16 patients with acute heart failure (AHF), 16 with stable chronic heart failure (SHF) and 32 healthy controls. Results. The number of circulating endothelial cells was greater in AHF patients than in SHF and controls (115.10± 63.44 vs 19.67 ± 3.17 vs 11.71 ± 2.92 cel/mL). The amount of circulating microparticles was greater in the AHF group than in the SHF and in both than controls (9,627 ± 4,986 vs 3,970 ± 3,452 vs 1,371 ± 739 p/µL). Von Willebrand factor was greater in both heart failure groups than in controls (234.3 ± 45.31 vs 245.92 ± 117.89 vs 100.14± 20.7%). C reactive protein was greater in the AHF group than in the SHF group or controls (20.29 ± 17.56 vs 7.65± 4.27 vs 1.44 ± 1.10 mg/dL). Interleukin-6 was also higher in the AHF group than in the SHF and in this greater than in controls (9.73 ± 9.37 vs 1.69 ± 1.36 vs 1.01 ± 1.09 pg/mL). Functional fibrinogen was only greater in the AHF group (350 ± 60.48 vs 264.08 ± 67.02 vs 254.29 ± 23.69 mg/dL). Conclusions. Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction run together in heart failure patients. The endothelial dysfunction observed seems to be proportional to the inflammatory state.

Introdução. Na insuficiência cardíaca existe uma importante ativação neurohormonal e inflamatória. Também parece existir uma disfunção endotelial. Nosso objetivo foi o de comparar ambos processos (inflamação e disfunção endotelial) em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca. Materiais e métodos. Comparamos marcadores de disfunção endotelial (células endoteliais circulantes, micropartículas circulantes e fator Von Willebrand) e de inflamação (proteína C reativa, interleuquina 6 e fibrinogênio funcional) em 16 pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca aguda (ICA), 16 com insuficiência cardíaca crônica estável (ICC) e 32 controles sãos. Resultados. O número de células endoteliais circulantes foi maior nos pacientes com ICA que no de ICC e que no controle (115,10 ± 63,44 vs 19,67 ± 3,17 vs 11,71 ± 2,92 cel/mL). A quantidade de micropartículas circulantes foi maior no grupo de ICA que no de ICC e em ambos grupos de pacientes em frente ao grupo controle (9.627 ± 4.986 vs 3.970 ± 3.452 vs 1.371 ± 739 p/µL). O fator Von Willebrand foi maior em ambos grupos de insuficiência cardíaca que no controle (234,3 ± 45,31 vs 245,92 ± 117,89 vs 100,14 ± 20,7%). Os valores de proteína C reativa foram maiores no grupo de ICA que no de ICC e que no de sãos (20,29 ± 17,56 vs 7,65 ± 4,27 vs 1,44 ± 1,10 mg/dL). A interleuquina seis encontrou-se mais elevada nos pacientes com ICA com respeito ao resto de grupos e nos pacientes com ICC com respeito aos sãos (9,73 ± 9,37 vs 1,69 ± 1,36 vs 1,01 ± 1,09 pg/mL). Com respeito ao fibrinogênio funcional só encontramos diferenças significativas entre o grupo de ICA e o resto de grupos (350 ± 60,48 vs 264,08± 67,02 vs 254,29 ± 23,69 mg/dL). Conclusões. De forma paralela à inflamação já conhecida na insuficiência cardíaca, se produz uma disfunção endotelial que a sua vez parece ser proporcional à gravidade da insuficiência cardíaca.

Inflamación y disfunción endotelial en la insuficiencia cardíaca aguda y crónica / Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in chronic and acute heart failure / InflamaþÒo e disfunþÒo endotelial na insuficiÛncia cardíaca aguda e cr¶nica

Introducción. En la insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) existe una importante activación neurohormonal e inflamatoria. También parece existir una disfunción endotelial. Nuestro objetivo ha sido comparar ambos procesos (inflamación y disfunción endotelial) en pacientes con IC. Material y métodos. Comparamos marcadores de disfunción endotelial (células endoteliales circulantes, macropartículas circulantes y factor von Willebrand) y de inflamación (proteína C reactiva, interleuquina 6 y fibrinógeno funcional) en 16 pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda (ICA), 16 con insuficiencia cardíaca crónica (ICC) estable y 32 controles sanos. Resultados. El número de células endoteliales circulantes fue mayor en los pacientes con ICA que en el grupo ICC y que en el grupo control (115,10 ± 63,44 vs 19,67 ± 3,17 vs 11,71 ± 2,92 cel/mL). La cantidad de macropartículas circulantes fue mayor en el grupo ICA que en el ICC y en ambos grupos frente al grupo control (9.627 ± 4.986 vs 3.970 ± 3.452 vs 1.371 ± 739 p/AL). El factor von Willebrand fue mayor en ambos grupos IC que en el control (234,3 ± 45,31 vs 245,92 ± 117,89 vs 100,14 ± 20,7%). Los valores de proteína C reactiva fueron mayores en el grupo ICA que en el ICC y que en el control (20,29 ± 17,56 vs 7,65 ± 4,27 vs 1,44 ± 1,10 mg/dL). La interleuquina 6 se encontró más elevada en los pacientes con ICA respecto al resto de grupos y en los pacientes con ICC respecto a los sanos (9,73 ± 9,37 vs 1,69 ± 1,36 vs 1,01 ± 1,09 pg/mL). Referente al fibrinógeno funcional, sólo encontramos diferencias significativas entre el grupo ICA y el resto de grupos (350 ± 60,48 vs 264,08 ± 67,02 vs 254,29 ± 23,69 mg/dL). Conclusiones. De forma paralela a la inflamación ya conocida en la IC, se produce una disfunción endotelial que a su vez parece ser proporcional a la gravedad de la IC.(AU)

Background. There is a neurohormonal an inflammatory activation in heart failure. There is also an endothelial dysfunction. Our objective war to compare both processes (inflammation and endothelial dysfunction) in patients with heart failure. Material and method. We compared endothelial dysfunction markers (circulating endothelial cells, circulating microparticles and Von Willebrand factor) and inflammatory markers (C reactive protein, interleukin-6 and functional fibrinogen) in 16 patients with acute heart failure (AHF), 16 with stable chronic heart failure (SHF) and 32 healthy controls. Results. The number of circulating endothelial cells was greater in AHF patients than in SHF and controls (115.10± 63.44 vs 19.67 ± 3.17 vs 11.71 ± 2.92 cel/mL). The amount of circulating microparticles was greater in the AHF group than in the SHF and in both than controls (9,627 ± 4,986 vs 3,970 ± 3,452 vs 1,371 ± 739 p/AL). Von Willebrand factor was greater in both heart failure groups than in controls (234.3 ± 45.31 vs 245.92 ± 117.89 vs 100.14± 20.7%). C reactive protein was greater in the AHF group than in the SHF group or controls (20.29 ± 17.56 vs 7.65± 4.27 vs 1.44 ± 1.10 mg/dL). Interleukin-6 was also higher in the AHF group than in the SHF and in this greater than in controls (9.73 ± 9.37 vs 1.69 ± 1.36 vs 1.01 ± 1.09 pg/mL). Functional fibrinogen was only greater in the AHF group (350 ± 60.48 vs 264.08 ± 67.02 vs 254.29 ± 23.69 mg/dL). Conclusions. Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction run together in heart failure patients. The endothelial dysfunction observed seems to be proportional to the inflammatory state.(AU)

IntroduþÒo. Na insuficiÛncia cardíaca existe uma importante ativaþÒo neurohormonal e inflamatória. Também parece existir uma disfunþÒo endotelial. Nosso objetivo foi o de comparar ambos processos (inflamaþÒo e disfunþÒo endotelial) em pacientes com insuficiÛncia cardíaca. Materiais e métodos. Comparamos marcadores de disfunþÒo endotelial (células endoteliais circulantes, micropartículas circulantes e fator Von Willebrand) e de inflamaþÒo (proteína C reativa, interleuquina 6 e fibrinogÛnio funcional) em 16 pacientes com insuficiÛncia cardíaca aguda (ICA), 16 com insuficiÛncia cardíaca cr¶nica estável (ICC) e 32 controles sÒos. Resultados. O número de células endoteliais circulantes foi maior nos pacientes com ICA que no de ICC e que no controle (115,10 ± 63,44 vs 19,67 ± 3,17 vs 11,71 ± 2,92 cel/mL). A quantidade de micropartículas circulantes foi maior no grupo de ICA que no de ICC e em ambos grupos de pacientes em frente ao grupo controle (9.627 ± 4.986 vs 3.970 ± 3.452 vs 1.371 ± 739 p/AL). O fator Von Willebrand foi maior em ambos grupos de insuficiÛncia cardíaca que no controle (234,3 ± 45,31 vs 245,92 ± 117,89 vs 100,14 ± 20,7%). Os valores de proteína C reativa foram maiores no grupo de ICA que no de ICC e que no de sÒos (20,29 ± 17,56 vs 7,65 ± 4,27 vs 1,44 ± 1,10 mg/dL). A interleuquina seis encontrou-se mais elevada nos pacientes com ICA com respeito ao resto de grupos e nos pacientes com ICC com respeito aos sÒos (9,73 ± 9,37 vs 1,69 ± 1,36 vs 1,01 ± 1,09 pg/mL). Com respeito ao fibrinogÛnio funcional só encontramos diferenþas significativas entre o grupo de ICA e o resto de grupos (350 ± 60,48 vs 264,08± 67,02 vs 254,29 ± 23,69 mg/dL). Conclus§es. De forma paralela O inflamaþÒo já conhecida na insuficiÛncia cardíaca, se produz uma disfunþÒo endotelial que a sua vez parece ser proporcional O gravidade da insuficiÛncia cardíaca.(AU)

Inflamación y disfunción endotelial en la insuficiencia cardíaca aguda y crónica / Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in chronic and acute heart failure / Inflamação e disfunção endotelial na insuficiência cardíaca aguda e crônica

Introducción. En la insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) existe una importante activación neurohormonal e inflamatoria. También parece existir una disfunción endotelial. Nuestro objetivo ha sido comparar ambos procesos (inflamación y disfunción endotelial) en pacientes con IC. Material y métodos. Comparamos marcadores de disfunción endotelial (células endoteliales circulantes, macropartículas circulantes y factor von Willebrand) y de inflamación (proteína C reactiva, interleuquina 6 y fibrinógeno funcional) en 16 pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda (ICA), 16 con insuficiencia cardíaca crónica (ICC) estable y 32 controles sanos. Resultados. El número de células endoteliales circulantes fue mayor en los pacientes con ICA que en el grupo ICC y que en el grupo control (115,10 ñ 63,44 vs 19,67 ñ 3,17 vs 11,71 ñ 2,92 cel/mL). La cantidad de macropartículas circulantes fue mayor en el grupo ICA que en el ICC y en ambos grupos frente al grupo control (9.627 ñ 4.986 vs 3.970 ñ 3.452 vs 1.371 ñ 739 p/µL). El factor von Willebrand fue mayor en ambos grupos IC que en el control (234,3 ñ 45,31 vs 245,92 ñ 117,89 vs 100,14 ñ 20,7%). Los valores de proteína C reactiva fueron mayores en el grupo ICA que en el ICC y que en el control (20,29 ñ 17,56 vs 7,65 ñ 4,27 vs 1,44 ñ 1,10 mg/dL). La interleuquina 6 se encontró más elevada en los pacientes con ICA respecto al resto de grupos y en los pacientes con ICC respecto a los sanos (9,73 ñ 9,37 vs 1,69 ñ 1,36 vs 1,01 ñ 1,09 pg/mL). Referente al fibrinógeno funcional, sólo encontramos diferencias significativas entre el grupo ICA y el resto de grupos (350 ñ 60,48 vs 264,08 ñ 67,02 vs 254,29 ñ 23,69 mg/dL). Conclusiones. De forma paralela a la inflamación ya conocida en la IC, se produce una disfunción endotelial que a su vez parece ser proporcional a la gravedad de la IC.(AU)

Background. There is a neurohormonal an inflammatory activation in heart failure. There is also an endothelial dysfunction. Our objective war to compare both processes (inflammation and endothelial dysfunction) in patients with heart failure. Material and method. We compared endothelial dysfunction markers (circulating endothelial cells, circulating microparticles and Von Willebrand factor) and inflammatory markers (C reactive protein, interleukin-6 and functional fibrinogen) in 16 patients with acute heart failure (AHF), 16 with stable chronic heart failure (SHF) and 32 healthy controls. Results. The number of circulating endothelial cells was greater in AHF patients than in SHF and controls (115.10ñ 63.44 vs 19.67 ñ 3.17 vs 11.71 ñ 2.92 cel/mL). The amount of circulating microparticles was greater in the AHF group than in the SHF and in both than controls (9,627 ñ 4,986 vs 3,970 ñ 3,452 vs 1,371 ñ 739 p/µL). Von Willebrand factor was greater in both heart failure groups than in controls (234.3 ñ 45.31 vs 245.92 ñ 117.89 vs 100.14ñ 20.7%). C reactive protein was greater in the AHF group than in the SHF group or controls (20.29 ñ 17.56 vs 7.65ñ 4.27 vs 1.44 ñ 1.10 mg/dL). Interleukin-6 was also higher in the AHF group than in the SHF and in this greater than in controls (9.73 ñ 9.37 vs 1.69 ñ 1.36 vs 1.01 ñ 1.09 pg/mL). Functional fibrinogen was only greater in the AHF group (350 ñ 60.48 vs 264.08 ñ 67.02 vs 254.29 ñ 23.69 mg/dL). Conclusions. Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction run together in heart failure patients. The endothelial dysfunction observed seems to be proportional to the inflammatory state.(AU)

Introdução. Na insuficiência cardíaca existe uma importante ativação neurohormonal e inflamatória. Também parece existir uma disfunção endotelial. Nosso objetivo foi o de comparar ambos processos (inflamação e disfunção endotelial) em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca. Materiais e métodos. Comparamos marcadores de disfunção endotelial (células endoteliais circulantes, micropartículas circulantes e fator Von Willebrand) e de inflamação (proteína C reativa, interleuquina 6 e fibrinogênio funcional) em 16 pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca aguda (ICA), 16 com insuficiência cardíaca crônica estável (ICC) e 32 controles sãos. Resultados. O número de células endoteliais circulantes foi maior nos pacientes com ICA que no de ICC e que no controle (115,10 ñ 63,44 vs 19,67 ñ 3,17 vs 11,71 ñ 2,92 cel/mL). A quantidade de micropartículas circulantes foi maior no grupo de ICA que no de ICC e em ambos grupos de pacientes em frente ao grupo controle (9.627 ñ 4.986 vs 3.970 ñ 3.452 vs 1.371 ñ 739 p/µL). O fator Von Willebrand foi maior em ambos grupos de insuficiência cardíaca que no controle (234,3 ñ 45,31 vs 245,92 ñ 117,89 vs 100,14 ñ 20,7%). Os valores de proteína C reativa foram maiores no grupo de ICA que no de ICC e que no de sãos (20,29 ñ 17,56 vs 7,65 ñ 4,27 vs 1,44 ñ 1,10 mg/dL). A interleuquina seis encontrou-se mais elevada nos pacientes com ICA com respeito ao resto de grupos e nos pacientes com ICC com respeito aos sãos (9,73 ñ 9,37 vs 1,69 ñ 1,36 vs 1,01 ñ 1,09 pg/mL). Com respeito ao fibrinogênio funcional só encontramos diferenças significativas entre o grupo de ICA e o resto de grupos (350 ñ 60,48 vs 264,08ñ 67,02 vs 254,29 ñ 23,69 mg/dL). Conclusões. De forma paralela à inflamação já conhecida na insuficiência cardíaca, se produz uma disfunção endotelial que a sua vez parece ser proporcional à gravidade da insuficiência cardíaca.(AU)

[Current topics in cardiology. Heart failure and heart transplantation]. / Insuficiencia cardiaca y trasplante.

The mission of the Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology is to study, promote interest in, and disseminate information about all aspects of myocardial dysfunction and heart transplantation. Heart failure is a highly prevalent disorder that consumes a substantial proportion of healthcare resources. Consequently, there is a very high level of interest in the condition and a wide range of preclinical and clinical research is being carried out, including research into new ways of looking at the disease that will increase our understanding. The aim of this article was to describe current developments concerning this disease and its treatment. Firstly, the latest publications on heart failure are summarized. Then, the most recent studies on advanced heart failure and ventricular assist devices are reviewed. Finally, the latest findings on heart transplantation are reported.