Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Orthop ; 95: 114-120, 2024 Feb 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients actively smoking at the time of primary hip or knee arthroplasty are at increased risk of direct perioperative complications. We investigated the association between smoking status and risk of revision and mortality within 2 years following hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We used prospectively collected data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. All primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs), total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), and unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKAs) with > 2 years' follow-up were included (THA: n = 140,336; TKA: n = 117,497; UKA: n = 14,807). We performed multivariable Cox regression analyses to calculate hazard risks for differences between smokers and non-smokers, while adjusting for confounders (aHR). RESULTS: The smoking group had higher risk of revision (THA: aHR 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.4 and TKA: aHR 1.4, CI 1.3-1.6) and risk of mortality (THA: aHR 1.4, CI 1.3-1.6 and TKA: aHR 1.4, CI 1.2-1.6). Following UKA, smokers had a higher risk of mortality (aHR 1.7, CI 1.0-2.8), but no differences in risk of revision were observed. The smoking group had a higher risk of revision for infection following TKA (aHR 1.3, CI 1.0-1.6), but not following THA (aHR 1.0, CI 0.8-1.2). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the risk of revision and mortality is higher for smokers than for non-smokers in the first 2 years following THA and TKA. Smoking could contribute to complications following primary hip or knee arthroplasty.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco
2.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 86(1): 1-9, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32490766

RESUMO

The purpose of this narrative review was to highlight the research on the influence of weather conditions on patients with osteoarthritis, the pathophysiological mechanisms and the therapeutic consequences. A search was conducted using the Pubmed, Medline and Web of Science databases. Barometric pressure, temperature and humidity are the weather conditions that are found to be correlated most to the worsening of pain complaints. But, due to the difficulty of measuring the impact of these variables and the great diversity in study protocols, an analysis of studies regarding this topic shows conflicting results. Central sensitization mechanisms and the function of a Transient Receptor Potential channel might explain the pain hypersensitivity to cold weather. Joint pain, caused by central sensitization mechanisms, cannot always be treated with joint arthroplasty. When pain remains present after joint arthroplasty, centrally mediated pain constitutes an important role.


Assuntos
Artralgia/fisiopatologia , Artralgia/cirurgia , Osteoartrite/fisiopatologia , Osteoartrite/cirurgia , Tempo (Meteorologia) , Artroplastia , Humanos , Medição da Dor , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
J Bone Jt Infect ; 5(3): 137-144, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32566453

RESUMO

Introduction: Two-stage revision is the most frequently performed revision procedure of a (suspected) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The reported results of this treatment show large variability between studies, ranging between 0 - 40 percent failure. The purposes of this study were to determine long term (1) reinfection rate, (2) re-revision rates for any reason, and (3) the reinfection rate of patients with positive cultures at reimplantation. Methods: We prospectively followed and retrospectively reviewed 113 consecutive two-stage revision TKAs, performed between 2003 and 2013 in our clinic with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Diagnosis of PJI was based on the major Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI. Results: After a mean follow-up of 94 months (range 24-172 months), infection recurred in 23 cases (23%). Of these, nine cases (9%) were defined as relapse (same micro-organism as index revision) and in 14 cases another causative was found (14%). In 11 patients debridement, antibiotics and retention of the prosthesis successfully eradicated the reinfection. After overall follow-up 17 patients (17%) underwent re-revision surgery, 11 patients (11%) due to an infection and 6 patients (6%) for aseptic reasons. Conclusions: Treatment of a (suspected) infection of a TKA by a two-stage revision had acceptable results based on re-revision and re-infection rates in the long term (>5 years), resembling the short-term results (<2 years). Focussing on the cultures at the index two-stage revision, episodes of relapse and new infections during follow-up were almost equally divided. Reinfection rates were higher in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation. Patients should be counselled appropriately in this particular situation.

4.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(12): 3023-3029.e2, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31447256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of obesity has resulted in an increased number of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs) performed in patients with a high body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether obesity negatively affects (1) complication rate, (2) reoperation and revision rate, and (3) patient-reported outcome in rTHA. METHODS: In this registry-based study, we prospectively followed 444 rTHAs (cup: n = 265, stem: n = 57, both: n = 122) performed in a specialized high-volume orthopedic center between 2013 and 2015. The number of complications, and reoperation and revision surgery was registered until 5 years postoperatively. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was evaluated preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were categorized based on BMI to nonobese (<30 kg/m2, n = 328), obese (30-35 kg/m2, n = 82), and severe obese (≥35 kg/m2, n = 34). RESULTS: Severe obese patients, but not obese patients, had higher risks of complications and re-revision than nonobese patients. In particular, the risk of infection following rTHA was higher in severe obese patients (24%) compared to nonobese patients (3%; relative risk, 7.7). Severe obese patients had overall poorer OHS than nonobese patients, but improvement in OHS did not differ between severe obese and nonobese patients. No differences between obese and nonobese groups on OHS were observed. CONCLUSION: In our study, severe obesity was associated with an increased risk of infection following rTHA. Patients with high BMI should be counseled appropriately before surgery.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Sistema de Registros , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...