Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. mex. cardiol ; 24(2): 55-68, abr.-jun. 2013. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: lil-714448

RESUMO

Introducción: Precisar la ubicación del electrodo de marcapasos en el tracto de salida del ventrículo derecho (TSVD) es difícil mediante las técnicas convencionales (fluoroscopia y electrocardiografía). La tomografía permite determinar de forma tridimensional la relación del electrodo en el TSVD. Objetivo: Determinar la localización del electrodo de marcapasos mediante la tomografía axial computarizada y comparar los resultados con la localización electrocardiográfica y fluoroscópica. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron 36 pacientes portadores de marcapasos definitivo VVI con el electrodo localizado en el TSVD, a quienes se les tomó un electrocardiograma de 12 derivaciones, proyecciones fluoroscópicas convencionales y tomografía multicorte para determinar la posición del electrodo en el TSVD. Resultados: Mediante el electrocardiograma se localizó el electrodo septal en 58.3% y en pared libre en 41.7%. Por fluoroscopia en oblicua anterior izquierda (OAI) a 35° se localizó el electrodo en pared anterior 5.6%, en pared libre en 38.9% y septal en 55.6%; en OAI a 45° en pared anterior en 2.8%, en pared libre 44.4% y septal en 52.8%. Mediante tomografía se documentó la posición anterior del electrodo en 39%, pared libre en 48% y septal en 13%. El coeficiente Kappa de las 3 pruebas mostró una concordancia muy baja. Conclusión: La tomografía es un mejor método para determinar la posición del electrodo en TSVD comparado contra la fluoroscopia y el electrocardiograma.


Introduction: Determination of the location of the lead of the permanent pacemaker in the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) it's difficult with the conventional techniques (fluoroscopic images and electrocardiography). The computed tomography (CT) allows to determinate in three dimensions the relation between the lead and the RVOT. Objective: Determine the location of the electrode lead by computed tomography and compare the results with electrocardiographic and fluoroscopy images localization. Material and methods: 36 patients were included with VVI permanent pacemaker with the lead in the RVOT. A 12-lead electrocardiogram, fluoroscopy images and CT were performed to determine the position of the lead in the RVOT. Results: By electrocardiogram, we located the lead in septal wall 58.3% and free wall 41.7%. By fluoroscopy images in left anterior oblique (LAO) 35° the lead was located on the anterior wall 5.6%, free wall 38.9% and septal 55.6%; in LAO 45° anterior wall 2.8%, free wall 44.4% and septal 52.8%. By Tomography the lead was positioned on anterior wall in 39%, free wall 48% and septal 13%. The Kappa coefficient of the 3 tests showed very low concordance. Conclusion: CT is a better method for determining the position of the lead on the RVOT compared to fluoroscopy images an electrocardiogram.

2.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 50(2): 209-12, 2012.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22882992

RESUMO

Reel syndrome is characterized by the rotation of permanent pacemaker generator on its transverse axis and electrode catheters curl around it, so this causes displacement of the electrodes with the loss of atrial and ventricular pacing. It can cause severe symptoms due to dysfunction of the pacemaker. We present three patient cases who after the placement of pacemaker attended by dysfunction of the displacement of the electrodes their clinical pictures were compatible with Reel syndrome.


Assuntos
Falha de Equipamento , Marca-Passo Artificial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...