Virulence of environmental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia serologically cross-reacting with Shigella-specific antisera.

This research involved an environmental strain of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia which has been reported to produce serological cross-reactivity with Shigella dysenteriae type 8 specific antisera. Since clinical diagnosis of shigellosis is largely based on culture and serology, the investigation was aimed at in vivo and in vitro virulence comparison between the culturally similar environmental S. maltophilia isolate and the reference S. dysenteriae strains. The findings of this study revealed the absence of virulent genes of Shigella sp. like ipaH, virA and stx1 and characteristic invasive large plasmid in the test isolate. The Western blot analysis revealed that serological cross-reactivity of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was due to certain protein component(s) in its outer membrane. The isolate was capable of producing extracellular protease, exhibited alpha hemolysis and was negative for hemagglutinating assay. The isolate gave negative reaction with rabbit ileal loop and Sereny tests. The S. maltophilia isolate did not possess any enterotoxic or invasive property as that of virulent S. dysenteriae strains. Further characterizations and adequate genetic manipulations of this environmental isolate may contribute to the development of a potential vaccine candidate for shigellosis.

Antiviral activity and safety of aplaviroc, a CCR5 antagonist, in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected, therapy-naïve patients: results of the EPIC study (CCR100136).

BACKGROUND: This phase IIb study explored the antiviral activity and safety of the investigational CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonist aplaviroc (APL) in antiretroviral-naïve patients harbouring R5- or R5X4-tropic virus. METHODS: A total of 191 patients were randomized 2:2:2:1 to one of three APL dosing regimens or to lamivudine (3TC)/zidovudine (ZDV) twice daily (bid), each in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 400 mg/100 mg bid. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed. RESULTS: This study was terminated prematurely because of APL-associated idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. A total of 141 patients initiated treatment early enough to have been able to complete 12 weeks on treatment [modified intent-to-treat (M-ITT) population]; of these, 133 completed the 12-week treatment phase. The proportion of subjects in the M-ITT population with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL at week 12 was 50, 48, 54 and 75% in the APL 200 mg bid, APL 400 mg bid, APL 800 mg once a day (qd) and 3TC/ZDV arms, respectively. Similar responses were seen in the few subjects harbouring R5X4-tropic virus (n=17). Common clinical adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea, nausea, fatigue and headache. APL demonstrated nonlinear pharmacokinetics with high interpatient variability. CONCLUSIONS: While target plasma concentrations of APL were achieved, the antiviral activity of APL+LPV/r did not appear to be comparable to that of 3TC/ZDV+LPV/r.

Hepatotoxicity observed in clinical trials of aplaviroc (GW873140).

Aplaviroc (APL) was a new CCR5 antagonist that was investigated in two dose-ranging studies with antiretroviral therapy-naïve, human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: ASCENT, in which 147 subjects were randomized 2:2:1 to receive zidovudine-lamivudine (ZDV-3TC) plus APL 600 mg twice a day (BID), APL 800 mg BID, or efavirenz (EFV), respectively, and EPIC, in which 195 subjects were randomized 2:2:2:1 to receive lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV-RTV) plus APL 200 mg BID, APL 400 mg BID, APL 800 mg once a day, or ZDV-3TC BID, respectively. Both studies (and, ultimately, the clinical development of APL) were discontinued after a mean of 14 weeks of therapy because of higher than anticipated severe liver toxicity; grade 2 or higher treatment-emergent elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were observed in 17/281 (6.0%) APL recipients but only 2/55 (3.6%) control recipients, while grade 2 or higher elevations in total bilirubin levels occurred in 29/281 (10.3%) APL recipients but only 4/55 (7.3%) controls. Two APL recipients developed grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent elevations in both ALT and total bilirubin levels, and one of these individuals had a severe case of hepatic cytolysis that was attributed to APL. Despite the high intersubject variability in APL plasma exposures, a Pearson correlation analysis of the combined study data did not reveal any significant associations between plasma concentrations and the liver enzyme elevations observed during the study. The mechanism for the idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity observed in the clinical trials of APL is unknown but is likely intrinsic to the molecule rather than its novel mechanism of action.

Oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Conventional systemic chemotherapy currently available for patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma is ineffective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of patients with this highly refractory disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label study evaluated a 28-day oral regimen of 5-FU (1 mg/m2 twice daily) plus the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, eniluracil (10 mg/m2 twice daily), in patients with chemotherapy-naive or anthracycline-refractory inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients enrolled into the study. No patient showed a confirmed partial or complete tumor response, although nine patients (25%) had a best response of stable disease. The median duration of progression-free survival was 9.6 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-10.6 weeks], and the median duration of overall survival was 32.7 weeks (95% CI 17.4-71.6 weeks). Eniluracil/5-FU was well tolerated. Diarrhea, the most frequent treatment-related non-hematological toxicity, occurred in 11 patients (31%). Hematological toxicities were infrequent and usually mild. CONCLUSIONS: Eniluracil/5-FU as a 28-day oral outpatient regimen is well tolerated by patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma, although minimal activity was observed when given as monotherapy at the dose used in this study.

A multicenter phase II study of a five-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil with or without leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a five-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil (776C85) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients with metastatic CRC that was previously untreated or refractory to 5-FU-leucovorin (LV) were enrolled and divided into two strata based upon their treatment history. Twenty-four had not previously received chemotherapy or had received adjuvant chemotherapy that ended > 6 months prior to enrollment on study (previously untreated stratum). Fifty-one patients had disease refractory to intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU-LV (previously treated stratum). All patients received seven consecutive daily doses of eniluracil (20 mg/day) with once daily oral 5-FU given on days 2-6, repeated every four weeks. One-half of the patients in each stratum also received 50 mg/day oral LV on days 2-6. The 5-FU dose was 25 mg/m2 when administered without LV and 20 mg/m2 when administered with LV. RESULTS: Partial response (PR) was noted in 2 of 12 patients receiving eniluracil-5-FU and in 3 of 12 patients receiving eniluracil-5-FU-LV in the previously untreated stratum. No responses were observed in the refractory disease stratum, however, 15 patients (30%) demonstrated stable disease over 2-18+ courses of therapy. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild; only 7% of patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression was frequent and dose limiting. Neutropenic sepsis was reported in 13.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Eniluracil with 5-FU administered orally with or without LV on a five-day schedule is active and well tolerated when given as primary therapy to patients with metastatic CRC.