[Guideline 'Treatment of breast cancer 2008' (revision)]. / Richtlijn 'Behandeling van het mammacarcinoom 2008' (herziening).

The Dutch evidence-based guideline 'Treatment of breast cancer' has been revised, and integrated with the guideline 'Screening for and diagnosis of breast cancer'. The guideline can be found on www. oncoline.nl and on www.cbo.nl. The Internet programme 'Adjuvant!' (www.adjuvantonline.com) can be used to predict both the prognosis and the efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy for each patient. The indications for adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy have been widened. The aim is to reduce the absolute probability of death by at least 4-5% within 10 years. The goal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer is to enable breast-conserving therapy for large tumours in relatively small breasts. One could consider transferring responsibility for follow-up after 5 years from the hospital to the screening organisation following mastectomy, to the family doctor following breast-conserving therapy, and to an outpatient clinic for hereditary tumours in carriers of gene mutation. Cessation of follow-up above the age of 75 could also be considered.

Factors influencing catheter-related infections in the Dutch multicenter study on high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral SCT in high-risk breast cancer patients.

Neutropenia following high-dose chemotherapy leads to a high incidence of infectious complications, of which central venous catheter-related infections predominate. Catheter-related infections and associated risk factors in 392 patients participating in a randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial and assigned to receive high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral stem-cell reinfusion were evaluated. Median catheter dwell time was 25 days (range 1-141). Catheter-related infections were seen in 28.3% of patients (11 infections per 1000 catheter-days). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were found in 104 of 186 positive blood cultures (56%). No systemic fungal infections occurred. Cox regression analysis showed that duration of neutropenia >10 days (P=0.04), using the catheter for both stem-cell apheresis and high-dose chemotherapy (P= <0.01), and use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN, P=0.04) were predictive for catheter-related infections. In conclusion, a high incidence of catheter-related infections after high-dose chemotherapy was seen related to duration of neutropenia, use of the catheter for both stem-cell apheresis and high-dose chemotherapy, and use of TPN. Selective use and choice of catheters could lead to a substantial reduction of catheter-related infectious complications.

Molecular subtypes of breast cancer and amplification of topoisomerase II alpha: predictive role in dose intensive adjuvant chemotherapy.

Benefit from chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients is determined by the molecular make-up of the tumour. In a retrospective analysis, we determined the molecular subtypes of breast cancer originally defined by expression microarrays by immunohistochemistry in tumours of patients who took part in a randomised study of adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer. In addition, the topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) amplification status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation and chromogenic in situ hybridisation. 411 of the 753 tumours (55%) were classified as luminal-like, 137 (18%) as basal-like and 205 (27%) as human epithelial receptor type 2 (HER2) amplified. The basal-like tumours were defined as having no expression of ER and HER2; 98 of them did express epidermal growth factor receptor and/or cytokeratin 5/6. The luminal-like tumours had a significantly better recurrence free and overall survival than the other two groups. From the 194 HER2-positive tumours, 47 (24%) were shown to harbour an amplification of TOP2A. Patients with an HER2-amplified tumour randomised to the high-dose therapy arm did worse than those in the conventional treatment arm, possibly caused by the lower cumulative anthracycline dose in the high-dose arm. The tumours with a TOP2A amplification contributed hardly to this difference, suggesting that TOP2A amplification is not the cause of the steep dose-response curve for anthracyclines in breast cancer. Possibly, the difference of the cumulative dose of only 25% between the treatment arms was insufficient to yield a survival difference.

Efficacy of high-dose alkylating chemotherapy in HER2/neu-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer has been abandoned by many. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 885 patients with stage III primary breast cancer and four or more axillary lymph node metastases were randomised to receive either five courses of FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) followed by radiation therapy and tamoxifen, or the same treatment but with high-dose alkylating chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin) replacing the fifth course of FEC. Of these patients, 621 had HER2/neu-negative disease, as determined by immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridisation. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 84 months, a trend for a better relapse-free survival was observed in the high-dose arm: (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, P = 0.076, two-sided). The 621 patients with HER2/neu-negative disease benefited from high-dose therapy, while patients with HER2/neu-positive disease did not (test for interaction, P = 0.006). There was a marked relapse-free survival benefit for patients with HER2/neu-negative disease (71.5% versus 59.1%, 5 years after randomisation; HR 0.68, P = 0.002) and also a survival benefit (78.2% versus 71.0% at 5 years; HR 0.72, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this subgroup analysis provide additional evidence that HER2/neu-positive breast cancer is relatively resistant to alkylating agents. For HER2/neu-negative tumours, however, high-dose chemotherapy should remain the subject of clinical studies.

An immunomagnetic epithelial tumor cell enrichment model for minimal residual disease detection of cytokeratin 8+ malignancies.

Immunocytochemical detection of isolated tumor cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow is currently the most established method for monitoring early dissemination in epithelial cancer. In this study we used an immunomagnetic selection technique to develop an enrichment model for disseminated tumor cells in blood. Buffy coat cells spiked with varying numbers of BT-474 carcinoma cells were permeabilized and fixed, following which carcinoma cells were magnetically labelled with an anti-cytokeratin 8 mAb. Labelled cells were enriched by the use of magnetic columns. The eluted cytokeratin 8+ tumor cells were detected by flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. Spiked samples were split and processed freshly in the immunomagnetic enrichment assay, as well as cryopreserved and processed in the assay after thawing. Enumeration of BT-474 cells demonstrated a detection limit of one BT-474 cell in 1.0 x 10(7) leukocytes in both fresh and cryopreserved-thawed samples. The pair wise comparison showed a significantly higher recovery of spiked BT-474 cells from freshly processed samples than from cryopreserved and thawed samples (57% vs 21%). Viability tests suggested that this outcome might be due to a greater susceptibility of BT-474 cells than buffy coat cells to the used cryopreservation and thawing technique. Altogether our findings show that the performance of the immunomagnetic enrichment assay on fresh samples is satisfactory with a recovery rate of almost 60% and a sensitivity of 10(-7). However, performance of the assay on cryopreserved and thawed cells needs to be improved.

Clinical experience with venlafaxine in the treatment of hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain practical experience with venlafaxine for hot flushes in breast cancer patients and incorporate this in a treatment protocol. METHOD: Twenty-two women with a history of breast cancer (mean age 49.2 years, range 35-65) were referred for consideration of treatment with venlafaxine for hot flushes. Patients received extensive information on treatment with venlafaxine and were advised to self-monitor the frequency of their hot flushes. RESULTS: Eight women did not start venlafaxine because they had no postmenopausal complaints, were lost to follow-up, had too low a frequency of hot flushes, or refused treatment. Eventually 14 women started venlafaxine. Two of them did not tolerate venlafaxine, four reported some effect but stopped because of side effects, two women had no effect whatsoever. Six women observed a clear ( > 50%) reduction in their hot flush frequency that was maintained at a median follow-up of 13 months. CONCLUSION: The group of patients referred for treatment was more heterogeneous and more patients dropped out because of side effects than expected. Extensive patient education, patient selection and evaluation of the treatment effect (by self-monitoring of hot flush frequency) are mandatory to avoid useless (continuation of) treatment and to prepare patients for side effects. Under these conditions, a substantial minority of patients benefit from venlafaxine.

Weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. A multicentre phase II trial.

Paclitaxel is a cytotoxic agent with proven antitumour activity in metastatic breast cancer. Weekly administration of paclitaxel has demonstrated sustained efficacy together with a more favourable toxicity profile (e.g. less myelotoxicity) than the 3-weekly administration. This study evaluates the activity and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol(R)) as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients (>70 years of age) with hormone-refractory metastatic breast cancer. Patients with metastatic breast cancer received 80 mg/m(2) paclitaxel administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Additional cycles were given until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. A dose increase to 90 mg/m(2) was allowed in the absence of toxicity. 26 Patients received a total of 101 cycles (median 4, range 1-11). 22 patients completed at least two cycles (six administrations). In 23 patients who were evaluable for response, there were 10 partial responses (38%), 9 patients with stable disease (35%), while 4 patients had disease progression (15%). The median duration of response was 194 days (>6 months). Overall treatment was relatively well tolerated, but 8 patients (32%) had to prematurely discontinue treatment because of fatigue. Neuropathy >grade 1 was noted only after five or more cycles in 4 patients. Weekly paclitaxel at this dose and schedule is an effective treatment regimen in the elderly patient with metastatic breast cancer, and is feasible, but yields relevant fatigue in a subset of patients.

Altered clearance of unbound paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The pharmacokinetic behaviour of anticancer drugs may be altered with aging due to (for example) differences in body composition and decreased hepatic and renal function. To address this issue for paclitaxel, we studied the pharmacokinetics of the drug in eight elderly women (>or=70 years) with metastatic breast cancer (median age (range), 77 years (70-84 years)) and a control group of 15 patients aged <70 years (median age (range), 54 years (22-69 years)). Paclitaxel was administered as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion at a dose of 80 (elderly) or 100 mg/m(2) (<70 years), and serial blood samples were obtained at baseline, and up to 24 h after the end of infusion. Paclitaxel concentration-time profiles were fitted to a linear three-compartment model without any demonstration of saturable behaviour. The clearance of unbound paclitaxel was 124+/-35.0 (elderly) versus 247+/-55.4 l/h/m(2) (<70 years) (P=0.002), and was inversely related to the patient's age (R(2)=0.857; P<0.00001). Total plasma clearance of the formulation vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) was 150+/-60.7 (elderly) versus 115+/-39.2 ml/h/m(2) (<70 years) (P=0.04). These data indicate an approximately 50% change in total body clearance of unbound paclitaxel and a concomitant significant increase in systemic exposure with age, most likely as a result of altered CrEL disposition. The clinical relevance of these observations with respect to toxicity profiles and antitumour efficacy requires further evaluation.

[Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement guideline, "Treatment of breast cancer"]. / CBO-richtlijn 'Behandeling van het mammacarcinoom'.

The first Dutch evidence-based guideline for the treatment of breast cancer has been developed to realise the optimal care of breast cancer patients in the Netherlands. This was possible due to the close cooperation of the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement [Dutch acronym: CBO] and the Dutch Consultative Committee on Breast Cancer [Dutch acronym: NABON]. A broad, multidisciplinary working group was appointed to develop the guideline. This group consisted of surgeons, radiotherapists, internists, pathologists, a radiologist, a nuclear medicine specialist, a plastic surgeon and a clinical geneticist, all of whom had been given a mandate to represent their respective professional societies. In addition to these medical specialists, there were physiotherapists, oncology nurses, psychologists, staff from comprehensive cancer centres and the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement and representatives from the Dutch Breast Cancer Association. This CBO guideline is divided into seven chapters: local treatment of operable breast cancer, systemic adjuvant treatment, locoregionally advanced disease, follow-up, locoregional recurrence, metastasised disease, and the psychosocial aspects of breast cancer. Although the guideline is not intended as a set of instructions that must be rigidly adhered to, deviations from the guideline must be motivated, principally on the basis of published scientific information. To obtain insight into the actual use of the guidelines 'Screening and diagnostics' and 'Treatment of breast cancer' the work group advocates a nationwide prospective registration of all breast cancer patients, including follow-up. Steps to this end have been undertaken. In this way, the CBO guideline will contribute to a further optimisation of breast cancer care in the Netherlands.

Combination chemotherapy of the taxanes and antimetabolites: its use and limitations.

In an effort to improve response rates of chemotherapy, taxanes have been combined with other cytotoxic agents such as antimetabolites. However, the use of some of these combinations in patients has been restricted by severe toxicity. The significance of the sequence of drug administration in combining methotrexate (MTX) and taxanes was recognised in in vitro studies, showing synergistic effects for the sequence of MTX followed by paclitaxel, and antagonism for exposure in the reverse order. A possible explanation might be an MTX-induced synchronisation of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle, after which cells are more susceptible for the cytotoxic action of taxanes. Clinical studies using this sequence were hampered by severe neutropenia and mucositis at relatively low doses of both drugs. As no pharmacokinetic interactions were observed, the excess of toxicity may have been due to sequence-dependent synergistic actions on bone marrow and mucosa. In contrast, and confusingly, in vitro studies on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and taxanes indicate that 5-FU preceeding or simultaneously given to paclitaxel impairs cytotoxicity as compared with paclitaxel monotherapy, while the reverse sequence results in additive or synergistic cytotoxicity. While almost all clinical studies have used the sequence of a taxane followed by 5-FU, various schedules appeared feasible and effective. The combination of a 5-FU analogue, capecitabine and taxanes was supported by in vitro data. A large phase III trial confirmed the feasibility and superior efficacy of this combination in breast cancer patients relapsing after an anthracycline. Conflicting results exist on the benefit of combining gemcitabine and taxanes in tumour cell lines. Although the accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) in mononuclear cells was significantly higher with an increasing dose of paclitaxel, no pharmacokinetic interactions for both agents were noticed. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the gemcitabine-docetaxel combination therapy has not been published in detail. Despite numerous trials, so far no optimum schedule has been established. Regarding data on actually delivered dose intensities, a 2- or 3-weekly cycle seems favourable and feasible. However, possible severe pulmonary toxicity warrants cautious monitoring of patients treated with this combination. Different outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies reveal that combining two chemotherapeutic agents is not simply a matter of putting antitumour activities together. Drug interaction may result in synergism, not only of efficacy but also of toxic side-effects. Adding two drugs may also implicate antagonism in drug efficacy due to unwanted interference in cytotoxicity or pharmacokinetics. For agents acting at a specific phase of the cell cycle, the sequence of administration may determine the efficacy and toxicity of a combination therapy. Because of an observed discrepancy between in vitro data and clinical studies, we would like to emphasise the need for adequate dose-finding clinical trials together with pharmacokinetic data analysis before examining any new combination chemotherapy in more detail in phase II studies.

Phase II study of weekly gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing or failing both an anthracycline and a taxane.

A phase II study was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine as third-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer, previously treated with both an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen. Twenty-three patients were treated with gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 in a 30-min infusion on day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Seventy-four percent of the patients had visceral metastases. No complete or partial responses were observed. Six patients (26%) had stable disease with a median duration of 4.0 months. The median time to progression was 1.9 months and the median survival time was 7.8 months. Neutropenia grade 3 and 4 was observed in four patients (18%). Non-hematological toxicity grade 3 included nausea and vomiting in 14%, skin toxicity in 9% and elevation of transaminases in 23% of the patients. Gemcitabine is ineffective as third-line single agent therapy in patients failing anthracycline and taxane treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

Capecitabine in breast cancer: current status.

Anthracyclines, together with taxanes, are at present the most active agents in metastatic breast cancer, while single-agent, bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is not very active in this setting. In view of encouraging results and tolerable toxicity of continuous infusion of 5-FU in gastrointestinal cancer, innovative oral 5-FU agents such as capecitabine have been developed. Capecitabine is a prodrug that is converted into the active compound 5-FU preferentially at the tumor site. An intermittent dosing schedule of capecitabine twice daily at a dose of 2510 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 in a 3-week cycle appeared to be feasible and resulted in a high dose intensity. A large phase II study investigating capecitabine in 135 advanced breast cancer patients, pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes, observed three complete and 24 partial responses (response rate, 20%), with a mean duration of 8.0 months. Preliminary results of a study comparing capecitabine with paclitaxel in 42 breast cancer patients failing anthracyclines indicate that the efficacy of capecitabine is comparable to that of paclitaxel, with response rates of 36% and 21%, respectively. Another study reported a response rate of 25% for capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in women aged > or = 55 years, which tended to be better than combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-FU. In all studies, capecitabine side effects were mainly mild, and treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of diarrhea (8%-11%), nausea (4%-11%), hand-foot syndrome (10%-18%), neutropenia (3%-20%), and bilirubin elevation (6%). Capecitabine is clearly an active agent for the treatment of breast cancer. It is currently registered in various countries for use in third-line treatment of metastatic disease. Its further role will have to be defined from data of randomized phase III studies.

Randomised trial of paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: quality of life evaluation using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Rotterdam symptom checklist.

The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life (QL) of patients treated with single-agent paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. 331 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomised, with 294 eligible for analysis. Patients completed both the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) with six additional items, at baseline and after the third, fifth and seventh cycles of chemotherapy. A significant difference in progression-free survival in favour of doxorubicin caused a bias in the data with differences in expected completion rates of questionnaires beyond cycle three. Therefore, statistical comparisons were performed only for the first three cycles. Baseline compliance was 64% and 61% for the QLQ-C30 and RSCL questionnaires, respectively. Doxorubicin was associated with significantly more nausea/vomiting (P=0.001), loss of appetite (P=0.010) and a greater burden of disease and treatment (P=0.044), but with less bone pain (P=0.042) and rash (P=0.045) than paclitaxel. Both treatments were associated with improved emotional function and reduction in psychological distress at cycle 3. Longitudinal data suggested that doxorubicin was associated with less pain, specifically bone pain. Doxorubicin was more active but may have had more side-effects during the first three cycles. Long-term QL outcomes could not be assessed.

[Adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with resectable breast cancer: guideline from the Dutch National Breast Cancer Platform and the Dutch Society for Medical Oncology]. / Adjuvante systemische therapie voor patiënten met resectabel mammacarcinoom; richtlijn van het Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg Nederland en de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Medische Oncologie.

There is an abundance of evidence that adjuvant systemic therapy with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy results in better survival for all patients with resectable breast cancer. The absolute 10-year survival advantage however varies for the different patient groups. Therefore, for each individual patient the choice of adjuvant therapy must take into account the potential benefits and the possible side effects. A group of medical oncologists from the Dutch National Breast Cancer Platform (NABON) and the Dutch Society for Medical Oncology (NVMO) prepared a guideline for the treatment of patients with early resectable breast cancer. The criterium for choosing adjuvant systemic therapy for the individual patient is an expected increase in 10-year survival of 5% or more. In the guideline a difference is made between patients with and without axillary lymph node metastasis. In patients with axillary lymph node metastasis the choice for adjuvant systemic therapy depends on the following prognostic factors: menopausal status, age, and the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the tumour. In patients without axillary lymph node metastasis the choice depends also on the following prognostic factors: the size of the tumour, the mitotic activity index, or the histopathologic grade of differentiation.

Value of estrogenic recruitment before chemotherapy: first randomized trial in primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Several preclinical studies showed that short-term pretreatment of breast cancer cells with estrogens can increase the antitumor efficacy of different cytotoxic drugs. Some early clinical studies in patients with advanced breast cancer did seem to support these findings. Therefore, the efficacy of estrogenic recruitment followed by chemotherapy was compared with that of chemotherapy alone in a randomized phase III study in women with lymph node-positive primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred twenty-eight patients with stage II/IIIA breast cancer who were younger than 66 years of age were randomly allocated to chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or FAC plus pretreatment with ethinyl estradiol (EE(2)). FAC (500, 50, and 500 mg/m(2), respectively) was administered intravenously once every 4 weeks for four cycles. EE(2) (0.5 mg) was administered orally, both 24 hours and immediately preceding FAC chemotherapy. RESULTS: Patient and tumor characteristics and chemotherapy dosages were comparable in both treatment groups. Of 318 assessable patients, with a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 177 patients had a relapse and 127 died. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to relapse-free, local recurrence-free, and overall survival according to univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, menopausal status, tumor size, grade, number of positive nodes, and steroid-receptor status. The power for the detection of an increase of 50% in the median relapse-free survival was 80%. CONCLUSION: Estrogenic recruitment of breast cancer cells before FAC chemotherapy did not influence the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/IIIA breast cancer patients after a follow-up of 6.8 years.

Phase II study of miltefosine 6% solution as topical treatment of skin metastases in breast cancer patients.

Topical treatment of skin metastases with a cytotoxic agent is attractive for its easy self-administration and absence of major systemic interference. Miltefosine exerts its cytotoxicity by acting on cell membrane phospholipids and can be administered topically. Twenty breast cancer patients with progression of skin metastases were treated with a 6% solution of miltefosine, which was topically administered once daily during the first week and twice daily thereafter. Sixteen out of 20 patients also had metastatic disease at other sites. Concomitant systemic treatment when ongoing for at least 2 months prior to study entry was permitted, and consisted of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in seven and nine patients, respectively. Prior palliative cytotoxic and hormonal therapy had been administered to 11 and 19 patients, respectively. No grade 3 and 4 toxicity occurred. Miltefosine therapy was discontinued in two patients due to nausea and in one patient due to skin toxicity. Grade 1 and 2 adverse skin reactions, and nausea and vomiting were seen in 11 and two patients, respectively. In 18 patients evaluable for response, four partial responses were noted (response rate 22%), while seven patients had stable disease. Three partial responses were observed in patients in whom the skin lesions were smaller than 1.5 cm2. Median duration of response was 2.5 months and median time to progression for all patients was 1.9 months. In this study topically applied miltefosine for metastatic skin lesions of breast cancer showed modest activity in a relatively heavily pretreated patient population, without serious systemic toxicity.

[Chemotherapy in metastasized breast carcinoma]. / Chemotherapie bij het gemetastaseerde mammacarcinoom.

Metastatic breast cancer is still an incurable disease. Standard hormonal and chemotherapeutic treatment modalities yield at the best a survival advantage of 1 to 2 years. However, palliation is still the second, very important goal of treatment for metastatic disease. First-line chemotherapeutic treatment with an anthracycline-containing regimen induces a response in about half the patients. In second-line treatment docetaxel is an effective agent even in patients failing first-line therapy with an anthracycline-containing regimen. There is no effective standard third-line chemotherapy scheme.

Doxorubicin vs epirubicin, report of a second-line randomized phase II/III study in advanced breast cancer. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

The EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group carried out a randomized trial to compare doxorubicin with epirubicin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients with at least one site of metastatic disease entered this trial, of whom 232 patients were eligible. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) or epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) i.v. every 3 weeks. The overall response rates for doxorubicin and epirubicin were 36% and 28% respectively (P = 0.173). The median time to progression was 23 weeks for doxorubicin and 19 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.063) and the median duration of response was 40 weeks for doxorubicin and 32 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.059). The median survival was 47 weeks for doxorubicin and 44 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.196). Leucocyte count on retreatment day (P = 0.011) and platelet nadir (P = 0.031) were significantly lower in the doxorubicin-treated group. Also mucositis (P < 0.001), diarrhoea (P = 0.005) and haemorrhage (P = 0.048) were significantly worse in the doxorubicin arm. Nine patients on doxorubicin and two patients on epirubicin experienced congestive heart failure (CHF). At the dose levels used in this study, no statistical differences in response rate and survival were found between the two treatment arms. Treatment with doxorubicin tended to result in a slightly longer duration of response and time to progression but doxorubicin was more toxic than epirubicin.

[Hormone replacement therapy following breast carcinoma]. / Hormoonsuppletietherapie na mammacarcinoom.

Additional advantages of hormone suppletion therapy (HST) in women with climacteric complaints are the reduced risks of development of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. A disadvantage is the enhanced risk of breast cancer. More and more women with a treated primary breast cancer nowadays have a relatively favourable prognosis; they might also profit by HST, especially if chemotherapy for breast cancer has led to an early menopause. Recent pilot studies of the connection between HST and recurrence of breast cancer are inadequate as to methodology and size to permit definite conclusions. There are numerous arguments for a connection between exposure to oestrogens and development of breast cancer. As long as it has not been demonstrated that HST does not lead to enhanced risk of breast cancer recurrence, the general recommendation should be not to administer HST to patients with treated breast carcinoma.

Lhermitte's sign following chemotherapy with docetaxel.

Specific causes for Lhermitte's sign (LS) in cancer patients are spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to the spinal cord, and cisplatin chemotherapy. We observed a transient LS in five of 87 patients treated with more than two cycles of 100 mg/m2 docetaxel (Taxotere). LS developed either concurrently or after the onset of docetaxel-induced sensory neuropathy, and disappeared after the discontinuation or dose reduction of chemotherapy.