Importance of primary care for underserved cancer patients with multiple chronic conditions.

PURPOSE: To understand the impact of pre-existing conditions on healthcare utilization among under- and uninsured patients in the transition from cancer treatment to post-treatment survivorship. METHODS: Using electronic health record data, we constructed a cohort of patients seen in an integrated county health system between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2016. Six hundred thirty-one adult patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast or colorectal cancer during this period (cases) were matched 1:1 on sex and Charlson comorbidity index to non-cancer patients who had at least two chronic conditions and with at least one visit to the health system during the study period (controls). Conditional fixed effects Poisson regression models compared number of primary care and emergency department (ED) visits and completed [vs. no show or missed] appointments between cancer and non-cancer patients. RESULTS: Cancer patients had significantly lower number of visits compared with non-cancer patients (N = 46,965 vs. 85,038). Cancer patients were less likely to have primary care (IRR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.27) and ED visits (IRR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.64) but more likely to complete a scheduled appointment (AOR = 4.83; 95% CI: 4.32, 5.39) compared with non-cancer patients. Cancer patients seen in primary care at a higher rate were more likely to visit the ED (IRR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.52, 2.80) than those seen in primary care at a lower rate. CONCLUSION: Health systems need to find innovative, effective solutions to increase primary care utilization among cancer patients with chronic care conditions to ensure optimal management of both chronic conditions and cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Maintaining regular connections with primary care providers during active cancer treatment should be promoted.

Retiring From Pediatric Emergency Medicine Too Soon?: A Survey to Discover the Reasons and Start a Conversation About Solutions.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric emergency medicine is a subspecialty known for high acuity, high stress, and variable scheduling that may be difficult to maintain as one gets older. This survey sought to gain information on the reasons or plans for early retirement in pediatric emergency medicine and offer ways to address these concerns to improve longevity in the field. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was sent via email to board-certified pediatric emergency medicine physicians who were older than 50 years to assess preretirement and postretirement considerations. Results were collected from October 3, 2019, through March 15, 2020. RESULTS: Pediatric emergency medicine physicians who find it more difficult to perform simple procedures are 3.02 (1.23-7.36) times more likely to retire before the age of 66 years. In addition, women were significantly more likely to report an intention to retire before the age of 66 years versus men (50% vs 31%, P = 0.022). DISCUSSION: The topic of retirement in a field that requires a wide range of procedural skills as well as constantly evolving technology is important. Understanding when and why physicians choose to retire may identify strategies to make it possible for pediatric emergency medicine physicians to prolong their careers. This may involve changes in work hours, a shift in responsibilities to a greater educational or mentor role, and/or providing opportunities to maintain skills. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived basic procedure skills deterioration significantly increased the risk for early retirement. In addition, women were significantly more likely to express intention to retire before the age of 66 years. Further research should be directed toward obtaining more detailed information to develop strategies to retain pediatric emergency medicine physicians in a capacity that benefits the physician, their institution, and their patients.