Parasitic myoma after laparoscopic morcellation: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic morcellation is frequently used for tissue removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy and may result in parasitic myomas, due to seeding of remained tissue fragments in the abdominal cavity. However, little is known about the incidence and risk factors of this phenomenon. OBJECTIVES: To identify the incidence and risk factors for the development of parasitic myoma after laparoscopic morcellation. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review of the literature in Pubmed (MEDLINE) and Embase was conducted. Reference lists of identified relevant articles were checked for missing case reports. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies reporting on incidence or cases of parasitic myoma diagnosed after laparoscopic morcellation were selected. Studies were excluded when history of laparoscopic morcellation was lacking or final pathology demonstrated a malignancy or endometriosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted and analysed on incidence of parasitic myomas and characteristics of case reports. MAIN RESULTS: Fourty-four studies were included. Sixty-nine women diagnosed with parasitic myomas after laparoscopic morcellation were identified. Mean age was 40.8 (± 7.5) years (range 24-57), median time between surgery and diagnosis was 48.0 months (range 1-192) and mean number of parasitic myomas was 2.9 (± 3.3) (range 1-16). The overall incidence of parasitic myomas after laparoscopic morcellation was 0.12-0.95%. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence is relatively low, it is important to discuss the risk of parasitic myoma after laparoscopic morcellation with women and balance towards alternative treatment options. The duration of steroid exposure after laparoscopic morcellation might be a risk factor for development of parasitic myomas. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Systematic review on the incidence and risk factors for parasitic myoma after laparoscopic morcellation.

Endometrial secretion analysis identifies a cytokine profile predictive of pregnancy in IVF.

BACKGROUND: The study of human endometrial-embryonic interactions is complicated by the disruptive impact of endometrial sample collection on the process of implantation itself. Endometrial secretion analysis is a novel technique, non-disruptive to implantation. The primary aim of this prospective cohort study was to explore whether a cytokine profile predictive of implantation and clinical pregnancy can be identified in endometrial secretions aspirated immediately prior to embryo transfer following IVF. METHODS: Endometrial secretions, aspirated immediately prior to embryo transfer from 210 women undergoing IVF, were analyzed using a multiplex immunoassay for 17 soluble regulators of implantation, namely interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, IL-17, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interferon (IFN)-gamma, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, eotaxin, IFN-gamma-inducible 10 kDa protein (IP-10), monocyte chemo-attractant protein-1 (MCP-1), Dickkopf homolog 1, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In order to detect implantation, daily urine samples were collected after embryo transfer, and human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) concentrations were analyzed by an immunoassay. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations (negative and positive association, respectively) between MCP-1 (P = 0.005) and IP-10 (P = 0.037) levels and implantation, and between IL-1beta (P = 0.047) and TNF-alpha (P = 0.023) levels and clinical pregnancy. The predictive value for pregnancy of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha was observed to be equivalent and additive to that of embryo quality. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial secretion cytokine profiling offers a novel, non-disruptive approach to study the role of the endometrium in human embryo implantation and identifies a profile which appears to be conducive to clinical pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (nCT00264992).

Cytokine profiling in endometrial secretions: a non-invasive window on endometrial receptivity.

Investigation of human embryo implantation requires a non-disruptive means of studying the endometrium during the window of implantation. This study describes a novel approach of cytokine profiling in endometrial secretions. Endometrial secretions aspirated prior to embryo transfer from 210 women undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were analysed by a multiplex immunoassay. Ten mediators [interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, eotaxin, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, interferon-gamma inducible protein-10, vascular endothelial growth factor] were detectable in 90-100% of the samples. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor, IL-5, IL-17, IL-10, Dickkopf homologue-1 and IL-15 were detected in 23-76%, whereas interferon-gamma was not detectable in any of the samples. To assess possible contamination of samples, cervical mucus was also aspirated for comparative analysis in 22 women. The endometrial cytokine profile differed significantly from cervical mucus. Pregnancy rates of the study participants who underwent endometrial secretion aspiration were compared with 210 controls matched for important prognostic variables; no significant differences were found. In conclusion, cytokine profiling in endometrial secretion offers an objective, non-disruptive means of analysing the in-vivo milieu encountered by the embryo and offers a new and potentially valuable approach to studying the endometrial factor in human embryo implantation.

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.

BACKGROUND: Semen preparation techniques for assisted reproduction, including intrauterine insemination (IUI), were developed to separate the motile morphological normal spermatozoa. Leucocytes, bacteria and dead spermatozoa produce oxygen radicals that negatively influence the ability to fertilize the egg. The yield of as many motile, morphologically normal spermatozoa as possible might influence treatment choices and therefore outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of gradient, swim-up, or wash and centrifugation semen preparation techniques on clinical outcome in subfertile couples undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (13 January 2007), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2007 ), EMBASE (1980 to January 2007), Science Direct Database (1966 to January 2007), National Research Register (2000 to 2007), Biological Abstracts (2000 to January 2007), CINAHL (1982 to October 2006) and reference lists of relevant articles. We also contacted experts and authors in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of semen preparation techniques used for subfertile couples undergoing IUI in terms of clinical outcome were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewer authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Five RCTs, including 262 couples in total, were included in the meta-analysis (Dodson 1998; Grigoriou 2005; Posada 2005; Soliman 2005; Xu 2000). Xu compared the three techniques; Soliman compared a gradient technique versus a wash technique; Dodson and Posada compared a gradient technique versus a swim-up technique; whereas Grigoriou compared swim-up versus a wash technique. No trials reported the primary outcome of live birth. There was no evidence of a difference between pregnancy rates (PR) for swim-up versus a gradient or wash and centrifugation technique (Peto OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.74 to 3.32; Peto OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.10, respectively); nor in the two studies comparing a gradient technique versus wash and centrifugation (Peto OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.57 to 5.44). There was no evidence of a difference in the miscarriage rate (MR) in two studies comparing swim-up versus a gradient technique (Peto OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.33). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific preparation technique. Large high quality randomised controlled trials, comparing the effectiveness of a gradient and/ or a swim-up and/ or wash and centrifugation technique on clinical outcome are lacking. Further randomised trials are warranted.

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles.

BACKGROUND: In order to improve embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, the use of glucocorticoids has been advocated. It has been proposed that glucocorticoids may improve the intra-uterine environment by acting as immuno modulators to reduce the uterine NK cell count, normalise the cytokine expression profile in the endometrium and by suppression of endometrial inflammation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the administration of glucocorticoids around the time of implantation improves clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI, compared to no glucocorticoid administration. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (February 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (1976 to June 2006), CINAHL (1982 to June 2006) and Science Direct (1966 to June 2006) were searched. Reference lists of relevant articles and relevant conference proceedings were also hand searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the research question were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted relevant data. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies (1759 couples) were included. Three studies reported live birth rate and these did not identify a significant difference after pooling the (preliminary) results (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.19). With regard to pregnancy rates, there was also no evidence that glucocorticoids improved clinical outcome (13 RCTs; OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44). However, a subgroup analysis of 650 women undergoing IVF (6 RCTs) revealed a significantly higher pregnancy rate for women using glucocorticoids (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.13). There were no significant differences in adverse events, but these were poorly and inconsistently reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is no clear evidence that administration of peri-implantation glucocorticoids in ART cycles significantly improves clinical outcome. The use of glucocorticoids in women undergoing IVF (rather than ICSI) was associated with an improvement in pregnancy rates of borderline statistical significance. These findings are limited to the routine use of glucocorticoids and cannot be extrapolated to women with auto-antibodies, unexplained infertility or recurrent implantation failure. Further well designed randomised studies are required to elucidate the possible role of this therapy in well defined patient groups.

What can the clinician do to improve implantation?

Implantation is a complicated process that requires the orchestration of a series of events involving both the embryo and the endometrium. Even with the transfer of high quality embryos, implantation rates remain relatively low. The growing tendency towards transferring fewer embryos provides further incentives to improve implantation rates. In this article, the various clinical strategies employed to increase the chance of implantation are reviewed. Embryo transfer technique is a critical step in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Recent studies have shown significant improvements in clinical pregnancy rates resulting from careful embryo transfer technique, appropriate catheter type and placing for embryo transfer. Increasingly, adjuvant pharmaceutical therapies are also being applied with the aim of improving embryo implantation. However, the evidence for their efficacy and safety is limited. Recent evidence suggests that adoption of milder ovarian stimulation regimens may provide a more effective clinical approach to improving implantation, since beneficial effects have been shown for both endometrial receptivity and embryo quality.

What can the clinician do to improve implantation?

Implantation is a complicated process that requires the orchestration of a series of events involving both the embryo and the endometrium. Even with the transfer of high quality embryos, implantation rates remain relatively low. The growing tendency towards transferring fewer embryos provides further incentives to improve implantation rates. In this article, the various clinical strategies employed to increase the chance of implantation are reviewed. Embryo transfer technique is a critical step in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Recent studies have shown significant improvements in clinical pregnancy rates resulting from careful embryo transfer technique, appropriate catheter type and placing for embryo transfer. Increasingly, adjuvant pharmaceutical therapies are also being applied with the aim of improving embryo implantation. However, the evidence for their efficacy and safety is limited. Recent evidence suggests that adoption of milder ovarian stimulation regimens may provide a more effective clinical approach to improving implantation, since beneficial effects have been shown for both endometrial receptivity and embryo quality.

A meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common reproductive disorder associated with many characteristic features, including hyperandrogenaemia, insulin resistance and obesity which may have significant implications for pregnancy outcomes and long-term health of the woman. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk of pregnancy and neonatal complications in women with PCOS. Electronic databases were searched for the following MeSH headings: PCOS, hyperandrogenism, pregnancy outcome, pregnancy complications, diabetes mellitus, type II. A handsearch of human reproduction and fertility and sterility was also conducted. Studies in which pregnancy outcomes in women with PCOS were compared with controls were considered for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Fifteen of 525 identified studies were included, involving 720 women presenting with PCOS and 4505 controls. Women with PCOS demonstrated a significantly higher risk of developing gestational diabetes [odds ratio (OR) 2.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-5.08], pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 3.67; 95% CI: 1.98-6.81), pre-eclampsia (OR 3.47; 95% CI: 1.95-6.17) and preterm birth (OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.16-2.62). Their babies had a significantly higher risk of admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.25-4.26) and a higher perinatal mortality (OR 3.07; 95% CI: 1.03-9.21), unrelated to multiple births. In conclusion, women with PCOS are at increased risk of pregnancy and neonatal complications. Pre-pregnancy, antenatal and intrapartum care should be aimed at reducing these risks.

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.

BACKGROUND: Semen preparation techniques for assisted reproduction, including intrauterine insemination (IUI), were developed to separate the motile morphological normal spermatozoa. Leucocytes, bacteria and dead spermatozoa produce oxygen radicals that negatively influence the ability to fertilize the egg. The yield of as many motile, morphologically normal spermatozoa might influence treatment choices and therefore outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of gradient, swim-up, or wash and centrifugation in subfertile couples undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) on clinical outcome as well as on semen parameters. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (30 June 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2003), EMBASE (1980 to July 2003), Science Direct Database (1966 to July 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2003), National Research Register (2000 to Issue 2, 2003), Biological Abstracts (2000 to June 2003), CINAHL (1982 to July 2003) and reference lists of relevant articles. We also contacted experts and authors in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs), comparing the efficacy of semen preparation techniques used for subfertile couples undergoing IUI, were included. RCTs or split sample studies examining semen parameters after different semen preparation techniques were also included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes, including 81 participants in total, were included in the meta-analysis (Dodson 1998-I/ II; Xu 2000-I/ II). Both studies compared swim-up technique versus gradient technique in 65 subfertile couples undergoing IUI. One study compared the effectiveness of both techniques with wash technique. No trials reported the primary outcome of live birth. There was no statistically significant difference between pregnancy rates (PR) for swim-up versus gradient / wash centrifuge (Peto OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.76; Peto OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.2 to 14.9; PR/ couple swim-up 20%, gradient 40%, wash 12.5%) or gradient versus wash centrifuge (Peto OR 4.01, 95% CI 0.82 to 19.56; PR/ couple swim-up 15%, gradient 20%). There was no significant difference in the miscarriage rate (MR) per couple between either of the three treatment groups in the one trial reporting this outcome (MR/ couple swim-up 0%, gradient 10.3%, wash 0%. MR/ pregnancy gradient 30.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in the multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) per couple between either of the three treatment groups in Dodson 1998-I/ II (MPR/ couple swim -up 0%, gradient 0%, wash 6.3%). One triplet pregnancy was recorded. Fifteen studies comparing semen parameters after processing were included. Two studies were included in the meta-analysis, we were not able to pool results. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific preparation technique. Large high quality randomised controlled trials, comparing the effectiveness of a gradient and/ or a swim-up and/ or wash and centrifugation technique on clinical outcome are lacking. Further randomised trials are warranted. Results from studies comparing semen parameters may suggest a preference for gradient technique, but firm conclusions cannot be drawn and the limitations should be taken into consideration.