Comparison of the Beacon and Quark indirect calorimetry devices to measure resting energy expenditure in ventilated ICU patients.

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) should receive nutritional support matched to their metabolic needs as both under- and overfeeding energy has been shown to increase mortality. Critical illness can significantly affect metabolism. Consequently, resting energy expenditure (REE) can vary markedly during critical illness. Therefore, indirect calorimetry to estimate REE is recommended to determine energy requirements in individual ICU patients and to guide optimal nutritional support. Currently, the Quark metabolic monitor is considered the gold standard in our ICU, but novel mechanical support devices are also equipped with indirect calorimetry functionalities. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a currently unevaluated device. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis in mechanically ventilated patients was conducted in a mixed medical-surgical ICU. The primary outcome was a numerical and visual comparison of the performance of the Beacon indirect calorimeter to calculate REE compared to the Quark device using Bland Altman plots. Performance was evaluated using bias, precision, accuracy, and reliability. Secondary analysis included a comparison with REE estimated by predictive equations. RESULTS: Seventy-one measurements were obtained in 27 mechanically ventilated subjects. An underestimation by the Beacon device in calculated REE of -96.2 kcal/day (4.5%) was found. There was a bias towards higher VCO2 and lower VO2 values with Beacon as compared to Quark. The reliability of the Beacon was good, with an absolute intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.897 (95%CI 0.751-0.955; p = 0.000). There was a poor correlation (<0.40) between the separate indirect calorimetry devices and most predictive equations. Only the Faisy predictive equations had good reliability (ICC 0.687, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Beacon indirect calorimetry accurately determined REE in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients compared to the gold standard in our ICU (Quark indirect calorimeter), although confidence intervals were wide. There was low bias and good reliability. On the other hand, predictive equations performed poorly compared to both devices, underestimating the true metabolic needs of mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Prospective experimental treatment of colorectal cancer patients based on organoid drug responses.

BACKGROUND: Organoid technology has recently emerged as a powerful tool to assess drug sensitivity of individual patient tumors in vitro. Organoids may therefore represent a new avenue for precision medicine, as this circumvents many of the complexities associated with DNA- or transcriptional-profiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SENSOR trial was a single-arm, single-center, prospective intervention trial to evaluate the feasibility of patient-derived organoids to allocate patients for treatment with off-label or investigational agents. The primary endpoint was an objective response rate of ≥20%. Patients underwent a biopsy for culture before commencing their last round standard of care. Organoids were exposed to a panel of eight drugs and patients were treated after progression on standard-of-care treatment and when a clear signal of antitumor activity was identified in vitro. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included and we generated 31 organoids of 54 eligible patients. Twenty-five cultures were subjected to drug screening and 19 organoids exhibited substantial responses to one or more drugs. Three patients underwent treatment with vistusertib and three with capivasertib. Despite drug sensitivity of organoids, patients did not demonstrate objective clinical responses to the recommended treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Organoid technology had limited value as a tool for precision medicine in this patient population because a large fraction of patients could not undergo treatment or because the recommended treatment did not elicit an objective response. We identified several essential parameters, such as the culture success rate, clinical deterioration of patients during standard of care, and rational design of drug panels that need to be accounted for in organoid-guided clinical studies.

Systemic exposure of oxaliplatin and docetaxel in gastric cancer patients with peritonitis carcinomatosis treated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.

In the PERISCOPE I study, gastric cancer patients with limited peritoneal dissemination were treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by (sub)total gastrectomy, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with 460 mg/m2 hyperthermic oxaliplatin followed by normothermic docetaxel in escalating doses (0, 50, 75 mg/m2). In total, 25 patients completed the study protocol. Plasma samples were collected before the start of the HIPEC procedure, after oxaliplatin washing, after docetaxel washing and the following morning. Median peak plasma concentrations were 5.5∗10-3 mg/ml for oxaliplatin, 89∗10-6 mg/ml for docetaxel (dose 50 mg/m2) and 113∗10-6 mg/ml for docetacel (dose 75 mg/m2). The following morning median plasma concentrations were 32% and 4% of the measured peak concentrations for oxaliplatin and docetaxel, respectively. For both cytostatic agents, no correlation was found between intraperitoneal fluid concentration and peak plasma concentration. High doses oxaliplatin and docetaxel can be given intraperitoneally without causing potentially toxic systemic concentrations.

Treatment of PERItoneal disease in Stomach Cancer with cytOreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraPEritoneal chemotherapy: PERISCOPE I initial results.

BACKGROUND: The role of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer is unknown. This non-randomized dose-finding phase I-II study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of HIPEC, following systemic chemotherapy, in patients with gastric cancer and limited peritoneal dissemination. The maximum tolerated dose of normothermic intraperitoneal docetaxel in combination with a fixed dose of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin was also explored. METHODS: Patients with resectable cT3-cT4a gastric adenocarcinoma with limited peritoneal metastases and/or tumour-positive peritoneal cytology were included. An open HIPEC technique was used with 460 mg/m2 hyperthermic oxaliplatin for 30 min followed by normothermic docetaxel for 90 min in escalating doses (0, 50, 75 mg/m2 ). RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, 37 patients were included. Of 25 patients who completed the full study protocol, four were treated at dose level 1 (0 mg/m2 docetaxel), six at dose level 2 (50 mg/m2 ) and four at dose level 3 (75 mg/m2 ). At dose level 3, two dose-limiting toxicities occurred, both associated with postoperative ileus. Thereafter, another 11 patients were treated at dose level 2, with no more dose-limiting toxicities. Based on this, the maximum tolerated dose was 50 mg/m2 intraperitoneal docetaxel. Serious adverse events were scored in 17 of 25 patients. The reoperation rate was 16 per cent (4 of 25) and the treatment-related mortality rate was 8 per cent (2 patients, both in dose level 3). CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy combined with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC was feasible using 460 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 50 mg/m2 normothermic docetaxel.

ANTECEDENTES: El papel de la cirugía citorreductora (cytoreductive surgery, CRS) combinado con la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC) en el cáncer gástrico no está definido. Este estudio fase I-II no aleatorizado de escalado de dosis fue diseñado para evaluar la seguridad y la viabilidad de HIPEC, después de la quimioterapia sistémica, en pacientes con cáncer gástrico con diseminación peritoneal limitada. Además, se exploró la máxima dosis tolerada (maximum tolerated dose, MTD) de docetaxel intraperitoneal normotérmico en combinación con una dosis fija de oxaliplatino intraperitoneal. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron pacientes con adenocarcinoma gástrico cT3-cT4a resecable con metástasis peritoneales limitadas y/o citología peritoneal positiva. Se utilizó una técnica HIPEC abierta con 460 mg/m2 de oxaliplatino hipertérmico (30 minutos) seguido de docetaxel normotérmico (90 minutos) en dosis crecientes (0, 50, 75 mg/m2 ). RESULTADOS: Entre 2014 y 2017, se incluyeron 37 pacientes. De los 25 pacientes que completaron la totalidad del protocolo del estudio, 4 pacientes fueron tratados en el nivel de dosis 1 (0 mg/m2 de docetaxel), 6 pacientes en el nivel de dosis 2 (50 mg/m2 ) y 4 pacientes en el nivel de dosis 3 (75 mg/m2 ). En el nivel de dosis 3, se produjeron dos casos de toxicidad limitante de dosis (dose-limiting toxicities, DLTs), ambas asociadas con un íleo postoperatorio. Posteriormente, otros 11 pacientes fueron tratados con el nivel de dosis 2, y no se produjeron más DLTs. La MTD de docetaxel intraperitoneal fue de 50 mg/m2 . Se registraron efectos adversos graves en 17 de 25 pacientes. La tasa de reoperación fue del 16% (n = 4) y la mortalidad relacionada con el tratamiento fue del 8% (n = 2; ambos en el nivel de dosis 3).

Factors influencing long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from appendiceal neoplasms.

Background: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease, most commonly of appendiceal origin. Treatment consists of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for recurrence and survival. Methods: This was an observational study using a prospectively designed database containing consecutive patients with PMP originating from the appendix, undergoing CRS-HIPEC at a tertiary referral centre between 1996 and 2015. Histopathological slides were reassessed. Cox regression was used for multivariable analyses. Results: Of 225 patients identified, 36 (16·0 per cent) were diagnosed with acellular mucin, 149 (66·2 per cent) had disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM) and 40 (17·8 per cent) had peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93, 69·8 and 55 per cent respectively. Recurrence was observed in 120 patients (53·3 per cent), 39 of whom (17·3 per cent) were treated with a second CRS-HIPEC procedure. Factors independently associated with poor disease-free survival were six or seven affected regions (hazard ratio (HR) 6·01, 95 per cent c.i. 2·04 to 17·73), incomplete cytoreduction (R2a resection: HR 1·67, 1·05 to 2·65; R2b resection: HR 2·00, 1·07 to 3·73), and more than threefold raised carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and/or carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level (HR 2·31, 1·30 to 4·11). Factors independently associated with poorer OS were male sex (HR 1·74, 1·09 to 2·77), incomplete cytoreduction (R2a resection: HR 1·87, 1·14 to 3·08; R2b resection: HR 2·28, 1·19 to 4·34), and more than threefold raised CEA and/or CA19-9 level (HR 2·89, 1·36 to 6·16). Conclusion: CEA and CA19-9 levels raised more than threefold above the upper limit identify patients with PMP of appendiceal origin and poorer survival.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus palliative systemic chemotherapy in stomach cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination, the study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (PERISCOPE II).

BACKGROUND: At present, palliative systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment in the Netherlands for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination. In contrast to lymphatic and haematogenous dissemination, peritoneal dissemination may be regarded as locoregional spread of disease. Administering cytotoxic drugs directly into the peritoneal cavity has an advantage over systemic chemotherapy since high concentrations can be delivered directly into the peritoneal cavity with limited systemic toxicity. The combination of a radical gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown promising results in patients with gastric cancer in Asia. However, the results obtained in Asian patients cannot be extrapolated to Western patients. The aim of this study is to compare the overall survival between patients with gastric cancer with limited peritoneal dissemination and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy, and those treated with gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled two-armed phase III trial, 106 patients will be randomised (1:1) between palliative systemic chemotherapy only (standard treatment) and gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC (experimental treatment) after 3-4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy.Patients with gastric cancer are eligible for inclusion if (1) the primary cT3-cT4 gastric tumour including regional lymph nodes is considered to be resectable, (2) limited peritoneal dissemination (Peritoneal Cancer Index < 7) and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology are confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy, and (3) systemic chemotherapy was given (prior to inclusion) without disease progression. DISCUSSION: The PERISCOPE II study will determine whether gastric cancer patients with limited peritoneal dissemination and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology treated with systemic chemotherapy, gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC have a survival benefit over patients treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy only. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03348150 ; registration date November 2017; first enrolment November 2017; expected end date December 2022; trial status: Ongoing.

[A woman with fever and a painful hip]. / Een vrouw met koorts en een pijnlijke heup.

An immunocompromised 78-year-old woman had a painful hip and subacute fever. An abdominal CT scan revealed a diverticular sigmoid stenosis fistulating to the presacral space, with free gas in the paravertebral musculature and spinal canal. Because a deep necrotising infection was suspected, she underwent surgery and was treated with antibiotics. She recovered completely.

Association between hospital volume and quality of gastric cancer surgery in the CRITICS trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the association between hospital volume and quality of gastric cancer surgery are lacking. In the present study, the effect of hospital volume on quality of gastric cancer surgery was evaluated by analysing data from the CRITICS (ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemotherapy In Cancer of the Stomach) trial. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent in the Netherlands were selected from the CRITICS trial database. Annual hospital volume of participating centres was derived from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospital volume was categorized into very low (1-10 gastrectomies per year per institution), low (11-20), medium (21-30) and high (31 or more), and linked to the CRITICS database. Quality of surgery was analysed by surgicopathological compliance (removal of at least 15 lymph nodes), surgical compliance (removal of indicated lymph node stations) and the Maruyama Index. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also compared between hospital categories. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2015, 788 patients were included in the CRITICS study, of whom 494 were analysed. Surgicopathological compliance was higher (86·7 versus 50·4 per cent; P < 0·001), surgical compliance was greater (52·9 versus 19·8 per cent; P < 0·001) and median Maruyama Index was lower (0 versus 6; P = 0·006) in high-volume hospitals compared with very low-volume hospitals. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications or mortality between the hospital volume categories. CONCLUSION: Surgery performed in high-volume hospitals was associated with better surgical quality than surgery carried out in lower-volume hospitals.

Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome is a multidimensional measure representing an ideal course after oesophagogastric cancer surgery. It comprises ten perioperative quality-of-care parameters and has been developed recently using population-based data. Its association with long-term outcome is unknown. The objectives of this study were to validate the clinical relevance of textbook outcome at a hospital level, and to assess its relation with long-term survival after treatment for oesophagogastric cancer. METHODS: All patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer scheduled for surgery with curative intent between January 2009 and June 2015 were selected from an institutional database. A Cox model was used to study the association between textbook outcome and survival. RESULTS: A textbook outcome was achieved in 58 of 144 patients (40·3 per cent) with oesophageal cancer and in 48 of 105 (45·7 per cent) with gastric cancer. Factors associated with not achieving a textbook outcome were failure to achieve a lymph node yield of at least 15 (after oesophagectomy) and postoperative complications of grade II or more. After oesophagectomy, median overall survival was longer for patients with a textbook outcome than for patients without (median not reached versus 33 months; P = 0·012). After gastrectomy, median survival was 54 versus 33 months respectively (P = 0·018). In multivariable analysis, textbook outcome was associated with overall survival after oesophagectomy (hazard ratio 2·38, 95 per cent c.i. 1·29 to 4·42) and gastrectomy (hazard ratio 2·58, 1·25 to 5·32). CONCLUSION: Textbook outcome is a clinically relevant measure in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery as it can identify underperforming parameters in a hospital setting. Overall survival in patients with a textbook outcome is better than in patients without a textbook outcome.

Safety of intraperitoneal Mitomycin C versus intraperitoneal oxaliplatin in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is commonly treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). There is an ongoing international debate about which intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic agent is preferred, Mitomycin C (MMC) or oxaliplatin. We questioned whether the type of chemotherapeutic agent influenced postoperative complication rates or short-term survival. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study patients with colorectal PC who underwent CRS-HIPEC between January 2010 and December 2016 were included. Until March 2014 patients had preferentially been treated with MMC and thereafter with oxaliplatin in an iso-osmotic glucose/electrolyte dialysis (Dianeal®) carrier solution. Main outcomes were postoperative complications, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: One hundred four patients received MMC and 73 patients oxaliplatin. Postoperative complications did not differ between groups (44.2% (MMC) versus 43.8% (oxaliplatin); P = 0.958). Median DFS was 12.5 months (IQR 6.4-32.4) in the MMC-group and 13.1 months (IQR 6.1-NA) in the oxaliplatin-group (P = 0.669). Median OS was 37.2 months (IQR 17.2-NA) in the MMC-group and 29.4 months (IQR 17.0-NA) in the oxaliplatin-group (P = 0.764). The type of chemotherapeutic agent did not influence OS in multivariable analysis (oxaliplatin versus MMC HR 1.09 (95%CI 0.58-2.06)). The HIPEC-phase was shorter for oxaliplatin (median 32 (IQR 31-34) versus 91 min (IQR 90-92) for MMC (P < 0.001)). CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal oxaliplatin reduced the chemoperfusion time when compared to intraperitoneal MMC without adversely influencing complication rates or short-term survival. It may therefore be the preferential drug in CRS-HIPEC procedures for colorectal PC.

Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The RECOURSE trial showed clinical efficacy for trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in daily clinical practice in The Netherlands. METHODS: Medical records of patients from 17 centers treated in the trifluridine/tipiracil compassionate use program were reviewed and checked for RECOURSE eligibility criteria. Baseline characteristics, safety, and survival times were compared, and prespecified baseline characteristics were tested in multivariate analyses for prognostic significance on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with a median age of 62 years were analyzed. Forty-three patients (32%) did not meet the RECOURSE eligibility criteria for not having received all prior standard treatments (n = 35, 26%) and/or ECOG performance status (PS) 2 (n = 12, 9%). The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (n = 44, 32%), leukopenia (n = 8, 6%), anemia (n = 7, 5%), and fatigue (n = 7, 5%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.3) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.9), respectively. Patients with ECOG PS 2 had a worse median OS (3.2 months) compared to patients with ECOG PS 0-1 (5.9 months). ECOG PS, KRAS-mutation status, white blood cell count, serum lactate dehydrogenase, and alkaline phosphatase were prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil in daily clinical practice is feasible and safe. Differences in patient characteristics between our population and the RECOURSE study population should be taken into account in the interpretation of survival data. Our results argue against the use of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with ECOG PS 2. FUNDING: Johannes J.M. Kwakman received an unrestricted research grant from Servier.

Biobanking of fresh-frozen endoscopic biopsy specimens from esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The process of preparing endoscopic esophageal adenocarcinoma samples for next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing is poorly described. Therefore, we assessed the feasibility and pitfalls of preparing esophageal adenocarcinoma endoscopic biopsies toward DNA/RNA samples suitable for next-generation sequencing. In this prospective study, four tumor biopsy samples were collected from consecutive esophageal cancer patients during esophagogastroduodenoscopy and fresh-frozen in liquid nitrogen. DNA and RNA were isolated from samples with a tumor percentage of at least 50%. For next-generation sequencing, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is required and high-quality RNA preferred. The quantity dsDNA and RNA quantity and quality were assessed with the Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Biopsy samples of 69 consecutive patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were included. In five patients (7%), the tumor percentage was less than 50% in all four biopsies. Using a protocol allowing simultaneous DNA and RNA isolation, the median dsDNA yield was 2.4 µg (range 0.1-12.0 µg) and the median RNA yield was 0.5 µg (range 0.01-2.05 µg). The median RNA integrity number of samples that were fresh-frozen within 30 minutes after sampling was 6.7 (range 4.2-8.9) compared with 2.5 (1.8-4.5) for samples that were fresh-frozen after 2 hours. The results from this study show that obtaining dsDNA and RNA for next-generation sequencing from endoscopic esophageal adenocarcinoma samples is feasible. Tumor percentage and dsDNA/RNA yield and quality emphasize the need for sampling multiple biopsies and minimizing the delay before fresh-freezing.

Selection of chemotherapy for hyperthermic intraperitoneal use in gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Several studies have shown the potential benefit of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer patients. At present the most effective chemotherapeutic regime in HIPEC for gastric cancer is unknown. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of chemotherapeutic agents used for HIPEC in gastric cancer. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify studies on chemotherapy used for HIPEC in gastric cancer patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The chemotherapeutic regime of choice in HIPEC for gastric cancer has yet to be determined. The wide variety in studies and study parameters, such as chemotherapeutic agents, dosage, patient characteristics, temperature of perfusate, duration of perfusion, carrier solutions, intraperitoneal pressure and open or closed perfusion techniques, warrant more experimental and clinical studies to determine the optimal treatment schedule. A combination of drugs probably results in a more effective treatment.

Germline TYMS genotype is highly predictive in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal malignancies receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This work was initiated to extend data on the effect of pharmacogenetics and chemotherapy pharmacokinetics (PK) on clinical outcome in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS: We assessed 44 gene polymorphisms in 16 genes (TYMS, MTHFR, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, DPYD, XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, ERCC1, RECQ1, RAD54L, ABCB1, ABCC2, ABCG2 and UGT2B7) in 64 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving capecitabine/oxaliplatin and 76 patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) receiving epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine, respectively. Plasma concentrations of anticancer drugs were measured for up to 24 h, and results were submitted to population PK analysis. We calculated the association between gene polymorphisms, chemotherapy exposure, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and chemotherapy-related toxicity using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: Patients with a low clearance of 5FU were at increased risk of neutropenia (P < 0.05) and hand-foot syndrome (P = 0.002). DPYD T85C, T1896C and A2846T mutant variants were associated with diarrhea (P < 0.05) and HFS (P < 0.02), and IVS14+1G>A additionally with diarrhea (P < 0.001). The TYMS 2R/3G, 3C/3G or 3G/3G promoter variants were associated with worse PFS in the CRC (HR = 2.0, P < 0.01) and GEC group (HR = 5.4, P < 0.001) and worse OS in the GEC group (HR = 4.7, P < 0.001). The GSTP1 A313G mutant variant was associated with a higher PFS (HR = 0.55, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.60, P = 0.002) in the CRC group. CONCLUSIONS: Germline polymorphisms of DPYD, TYMS and GSTP1 have a significant effect on toxicity and clinical outcome in patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced colorectal or gastroesophageal cancer. These data should further be validated in prospective clinical studies.

Serum human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) as biomarker for the differentiation between epithelial ovarian cancer and ovarian metastases of gastrointestinal origin.

OBJECTIVE: About 5-15% of all malignant ovarian tumors are metastases from other malignancies such as gastrointestinal tumors, breast cancer or melanoma. Also other gynecological tumors can metastasize to the ovaries. It is crucial to differentiate between primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and ovarian metastases because different treatment is required. The clinical value of human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) as a serum biomarker in primary ovarian cancer has been established. The use of HE4 in the differentiation between primary ovarian cancer and ovarian metastases from other malignancies has never been investigated. METHODS: HE4, CA125 and CEA were measured in 192 patients with EOC (n=147) or ovarian metastases (n=40). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were done. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for all markers and ratios hereof using receiver operating characteristics methodology. RESULTS: Median serum HE4 concentration was significantly higher in patients with EOC compared to patients with ovarian metastases (431 pmol/L vs 68 pmol/L, p<0.001). HE4 and CEA were independent factors in differentiating between EOC and ovarian metastases (both p<0.001) while CA125 was not (p=0.33). The HE4(2.5)/CEA ratio demonstrated the highest discriminative value (ROC-AUC 0.94) compared to HE4, CEA, CA125 or CA125/CEA ratio (0.88, 0.78, 0.80 and 0.89 respectively) and showed a specificity of 82.5% at set sensitivity of 90% in discriminating EOC from ovarian metastases. CONCLUSION: HE4 can be used in combination with CEA to make the distinction between EOC and ovarian metastases from gastrointestinal origin.

HER2 positivity in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathological analysis and comparison.

PURPOSE: Primary tumor classification of gastric or esophageal cancer has changed significantly with recent alterations of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. Considering these alterations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity rates were determined and compared in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Additionally, HER2 positivity in relation to other clinicopathological characteristics was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 321 patients with histologically confirmed invasive gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma were examined for HER2 by immunohistochemy (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/CISH-positive tumors were considered HER2 positive. Clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively retrieved from the patient records. RESULTS: HER2 positivity was found in 50 of 321 patients (15.6 %). In univariate and multivariate logistic models, HER2 positivity rates were significantly higher in esophageal primary tumors (esophageal 25.0 % vs. gastric 7.4 %) and in intestinal histological tumor type (intestinal 22.6 % vs. diffuse/mixed 5.7 %). No significant differences in HER2 positivity were found between males and females, age below and above 65 years, biopsies and surgical specimens or advanced and early-stage disease. Using the 7th TNM edition, many tumors (30.5 % of all included tumors and 64.5 % of all esophageal primary tumors) previously classified as gastric cancer are now classified as esophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: HER2 positivity occurs in 15.6 % of invasive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in Western patients, of which the majority is esophageal primary tumors and of the intestinal tumor type. With the introduction of the 7th TNM edition, a large number of tumors previously classified as gastric are now classified as esophageal tumors instead, with relatively high HER2 positivity rates in these esophageal primary tumors.

Smoking and older age associated with mumps in an outbreak in a group of highly-vaccinated individuals attending a youth club party, the Netherlands, 2012.

We describe a mumps outbreak in a highly-vaccinated population attending a party at a youth club. In a retrospective cohort study with 60 of approximately 100 participants responding, vaccination status was verified for 58/59 respondents, of whom 54 were vaccinated twice and four once. The attack rate was 22% (13 cases, all vaccinated), with smoking at the party (risk ratio (RR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6­6.0, p=0.001) and age ≥21 years (RR 4.7; 95% CI: 2.1­10.2, p<0.0001) as risk factors for disease in the binominal regression analysis. Mild upper respiratory illness was also highly prevalent in those who did not meet the mumps case definition (n=46) after the party, suggesting that mumps virus infection may cause mild disease in vaccinated individuals. Our investigation adds toevidence that crowded social events and smoking may facilitate spread of mumps virus among vaccinated populations, with waning immunity playing a role. The suggestion that mumps virus infection in vaccinated individuals may manifest as mild upper respiratory illness could have implications for transmission and warrants further investigation.

Treatment of ovarian metastases of colorectal and appendiceal carcinoma in the era of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

AIM: To compare outcome of women with ovarian metastasis who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) to outcome of women without ovarian metastasis who underwent CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: A prospective CRS-HIPEC database was searched to identify women with surgically treated colorectal carcinoma between 2000 and 2012. Patients with ovarian metastasis were identified and patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis but without ovarian metastasis were included as control cases. RESULTS: 75 patients with macroscopic ovarian metastasis underwent CRS-HIPEC with curative intent, while 50 female patients without ovarian metastasis were identified who underwent CRS-HIPEC. Patients with ovarian metastasis more often had a primary appendiceal tumour and had a more extensive intra-abdominal tumour load compared to patients without ovarian metastases. Median follow-up time was 45 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 37-53 months). Overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between the two groups with a median OS in the ovarian metastasis group of 40 months (95% CI 26-54) compared to 64 months (95% CI 17-111, P = 0.478) in the non-ovarian metastasis group. Recurrence patterns did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.183). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ovarian metastasis of colorectal and appendiceal origin who underwent CRS-HIPEC had similar outcome compared to patients without ovarian metastasis. Given the findings of high coincidence of peritoneal metastases with ovarian metastases and ovarian metastases not being an independent factor for survival after CRS-HIPEC, this procedure should be recommended for patients with peritoneal metastases and ovarian metastases of colorectal and appendiceal carcinoma.

Perioperative systemic chemotherapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis of lymph node positive colorectal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the preferred treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal carcinoma. Patients with positive lymph node status have worse survival after CRS-HIPEC, which is probably due to higher rates of systemic failure. In this study, we analysed the effect of administration and timing of systemic chemotherapy on the outcome of lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was reviewed to identify lymph node positive patients with PC treated with CRS-HIPEC within 1 year after primary tumour diagnosis between 2004 and 2012. Medical history of the patients was studied for the administration of perioperative systemic chemotherapy and follow-up. Outcome parameters were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and pattern of recurrence. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients treated with CRS-HIPEC for PC from lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma were identified. Fourteen patients received pre-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy only, 32 patients underwent post-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy only, 9 patients received chemotherapy both pre- and post-CRS-HIPEC and 16 patients did not receive any systemic chemotherapy. Of the 47 patients who did not receive pre-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy, 11 (23%) did not receive any chemotherapy due to major postoperative complications. PFS and OS were significantly higher in patients who received systemic chemotherapy (PFS: median 15 versus 4 months, P = 0.024; OS: median 30 versus 14 months, P = 0.015), although this difference was attenuated after adjustment for major complications. Different chemotherapy timings did not differ significantly in either survival or recurrence patterns. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PC from lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma, perioperative systemic chemotherapy is associated with increased OS and PFS, although this difference may be partly explained by the occurrence of major postoperative complication; with no evidence of difference in PFS, OS and systemic recurrence rate by timing of systemic chemotherapy.