RESUMO
Spirometry plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of asthma. The hallmark spirometry finding of expiratory airflow variability can be demonstrated in several ways including peak airflow and bronchodilator and bronchoprovocation testing. Challenges of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis underscore the need to consider clinical context while interpreting these tests. A meticulous and multifaceted approach prioritizing objective testing is imperative while diagnosing asthma.
Assuntos
Asma , Humanos , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Asma/diagnóstico , Espirometria , Óxido Nítrico , Volume Expiratório ForçadoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Rhabdomyolysis is a serious condition that can cause acute kidney injury (AKI), compartment syndrome, severe metabolic and electrolyte derangement leading to arrhythmias, and even death. Total plasma exchange (TPE) has been used as a treatment modality to clear myoglobin, but the evidence is limited. In this study, we aim to investigate the use of TPE in critically ill rhabdomyolysis patients. METHODS: We retrospectively chart reviewed adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis between 2012 and 2021. We dichotomized patients into two groups based on whether TPE was used or not in addition to standard care. PRISMA machines with TPE2000 filters and either 5% albumin or fresh frozen plasma were used in the TPE group. RESULTS: The patients' age ranged from 23 years to 87 years (mean 49.4, SD 18.1), and 51% were male. Initial creatinine ranged from 0.6 to 16mg/dL (mean 3.4, SD 2.7), creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) from 403-93,232 U/L, and myoglobin from 934 to >20,000. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)scores on admission ranged from 6 to 17 (mean 7.23, SD 3.40). Overall, 28.78% (N=19) of the patients received therapeutic plasma exchange. The overall mortality in our study was 31.9%, with the length of ICU stay ranging from 1-25 days (mean 7.10, SD 5.91) among survivors. Older age and the presence of shock were predictive of mortality in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no statistically significant association in mortality between the TPE and non-TPE groups (36.84% in TPE vs. 36.17% in the non-TPE group, OR 0.7209, p=0.959). Only two patients in the non-TPE group developed CKD/ESRD on long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that TPE administration in critically ill patients with rhabdomyolysis did not improve mortality or length of ICU stay. Further studies are required to elucidate its indication and effect on long-term renal outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Each dialysis session uses approximately 150 to 200 L of water. The winter storm that swept southwest USA saw an unprecedented disruption of water supplies due to which intermittent hemodialysis could not be performed for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. We present 4 cases when continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was utilized to provide urgent hemodialysis in hemodynamically stable, non-critically ill ESRD patients during this time of water supply crisis. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patients were between the ages 47-62 years old, mostly male. Indications for urgent hemodialysis included volume overload with pulmonary edema and respiratory distress, hypertensive crisis, refractory hyperkalemia, and uremic encephalopathy. The CRRT equipment used included the PRISMAX system for CRRT with M150 filters. Continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) more was used with a dialysate flow rate of 6 L /hour and a blood flow rate of 200/per hour with calculated urea clearance of 100 mL/min. The duration of treatment was 8 h to achieve the target Kt/V of 1.15, comparable to the recommended 1.2 provided by IHD. All patients tolerated the procedure well with the resolution of their acute conditions and normalization of blood pressure and electrolytes. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate limited CRRT as an alternative to safely manage ESRD patients needing urgent hemodialysis in the scenario of a natural disaster resulting in a water outage.