RESUMO
Background: The optimal tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts remains controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the TensionLoc (TL) cortical fixation device with the Double Spike Plate (DSP) fixation device for ACL tibial fixation using both bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and quadriceps grafts. It was hypothesized that there would be no differences in biomechanical characteristics between the fixation devices regardless of graft type. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: ACLR was performed on 14 matched-pair cadaveric knee specimens-7 pairs using quadriceps grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 51 ± 8 years) and 7 pairs using BTB grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 50 ± 7 years). One side of each pair was randomized to receive DSP fixation, and the contralateral side received TL fixation. Specimens underwent cyclic ramp loading (10 cycles each at 50-100 N, 50-250 N, and 50-400 N), followed by load-to-failure testing, with the tensile force in line with the tibial tunnel. Results between the 2 fixation types were compared with a paired t test. Results: For the quadriceps graft, there were no significant differences in cyclic loading or load-to-failure characteristics between fixation types (P≥ .092 for all parameters). For the BTB graft, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP at all cyclic testing cycles except for cycle 1 during 100-N loading and had lower displacement at 250-N loading (3.4 ± 0.1 vs 5.4 ± 0.3 mm; P = .045). For load to failure, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP fixation (232 ± 3.1 vs 188.4 ± 6.4 N/mm; P = .046); however, all other load-to-failure parameters were not statistically different (P≥ .135 for all parameters). Conclusion: With the quadriceps tendon graft, there were no significant differences in biomechanical characteristics between TL and DSP ACL tibial fixations; however, with BTB grafts, the TL tibial fixation demonstrated greater biomechanical integrity than the DSP tibial fixation. Clinical Relevance: The TL fixation device may provide an alternative ACL tibial fixation option for BTB and soft tissue grafts.
RESUMO
Medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction has been a topic of controversy in regard to the need for surgical reconstruction as well as the type of surgical reconstruction to be performed. Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and MCL reconstruction has been found to be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative arthrofibrosis than isolated ACL reconstruction; performing these reconstructions in a staged format has been proposed to avoid this devastating complication. We present a technique for MCL reconstruction that physiometrically re-establishes both anterior and posterior stabilizing components of the MCL and is performed with a limited soft-tissue dissection. This technique can easily be combined with an ACL allograft or hamstring reconstruction without need for staged or significantly delayed procedure. The technical details of this technique allow for stable fixation of an allograft reconstruction to allow for immediate postoperative knee range of motion with low patient morbidity because of the limited surgical approach.
