[Olfactory groove meningiomas. Radical microsurgical treatment through the bifrontal approach]. / Meningiomas del surco olfatorio. Tratamiento microquirúrgico radical por via bifrontal.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the microsurgical technique for the radical removal of olfactory groove meningiomas through the bifrontal approach. To review the diagnostic elements to be taken into account in the selection of the surgical approach to these tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A microsurgical series of 35 olfactory groove meningiomas operated on through a bifrontal craniotomy is reviewed. RESULTS: The mean tumoral volume was 85cc (4.4cm diameter). A relevant peritumoral brain edema was found in 65.7% of cases, hyperostosis in the implantation base in 80% and paranasal sinus invasion in 28.6%. A Sipmson grade 1 resection was achieved in every case. A patient died due to a postoperative pneumonia. Postoperative hospitalization time was between 3 and 20 days and at discharge all patients had a Glasgow Outcome Scale grade 4-5. The mean follow-up was 55.2 months. Two patients had postoperative transient rhinolicuorrhea and an additional patient developed hydrocephalus. An asymptomatic recurrence have been identified in a patient four years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the bifrontal approach allowed the radical removal of huge olfactory groove meningiomas. The microdissection of the anterior cerebral artery A2 segments is possible thanks to the arachnoidal plane between vessels and tumor. Tumoral blood flow is secured by the early approaching of the base of the tumor and preoperative embolization is not necessary. Bifrontal approach allows an aggressive treatment of the hyperostosis, bone infiltration and paranasal sinus invasion. Anterior fossa reconstruction is done using a vascularized periosteal flap.

Meningiomas del surco olfatorio. Tratamiento microquirúrgico radical por vía bifrontal / Olfactory groove meningiomas. Radical microsurgical treatment through the bifrontal approach

Objetivos. Describir los detalles técnicos del abordajebifrontal para el tratamiento microquirúrgicoradical de los meningiomas del surco olfatorio. Revisarlos factores diagnósticos a valorar en la selección delabordaje quirúrgico de estos tumores.Material y métodos. Se revisa una serie microquirúrgicade 35 tumores del surco olfatorio intervenidospor vía bifrontal.Resultados. El volumen medio de las lesiones era de85 cc (4.4 cm de diámetro). El 65.7% presentaban edemacerebral perilesional relevante, el 80% hiperostosis enla base de implantación y el 28.6% invasión de los senosparanasales. En todos los casos se realizó una exéresisgrado 1 de Simpson. Hubo un éxitus por neumonía. Laestancia hospitalaria fue de 3-20 días, con un GlasgowOutcome Scale 4-5 al alta en todos los casos y seguimientomedio de 55.2 meses. Como complicacionesrelevantes destacan rinolicuorrea transitoria en doscasos e hidrocefalia en otro caso. Se ha identificado unarecidiva local asintomática en un paciente a los 4 años (..) (AU)

Objectives. To describe the microsurgical techniquefor the radical removal of olfactory groove meningiomasthrough the bifrontal approach. To review the diagnosticelements to be taken into account in the selection ofthe surgical approach to these tumours.Materials and methods. A microsurgical series of 35olfactory groove meningiomas operated on through abifrontal craniotomy is reviewed.Results. The mean tumoral volume was 85cc (4.4cmdiameter). A relevant peritumoral brain edema wasfound in 65.7% of cases, hyperostosis in the implantationbase in 80% and paranasal sinus invasion in28.6%. A Sipmson grade 1 resection was achievedin every case. A patient died due to a postoperativepneumonia. Postoperative hospitalization time wasbetween 3 and 20 days and at discharge all patientshad a Glasgow Outcome Scale grade 4-5. The meanfollow-up was 55.2 months. Two patients had postoperativetransient rhinolicuorrhea and an additional (..) (AU)

[Treatment of intrinsic brain tumors located in motor eloquent areas. Results of a protocol based in navigation, tractography and neurophysiological monitoring of cortical and subcortical structures]. / Tratamiento de los tumores cerebrales intrínsecos de áreas motoras elocuentes. Resultados de un protocolo basado en la navegación, tractografía y monitorización neurofisiológica de estructuras corticales y subcorticales.

OBJECTIVES: The role of the microsurgical management of intrinsic brain tumors is to maximize the volumetric resection of the tumoral tissue minimizing the postoperative morbidity. The purpose of our paper has been to study the benefits of an original protocol developed for the microsurgical treatment of tumors located in eloquent motor areas where the navigation and electrical stimulation of motor subcortical pathways have been implemented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 patients operated on for resection of cortical or subcortical tumors in motor areas were included in the series. Preoperative planning for multimodal navigation was done integrating anatomic studies, motor functional MRI (f-MRI) and subcortical pathways volumes generated by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Intraoperative neuromonitorization included motor mapping by direct cortical and subcortical electrical stimulation (CS and sCS) and localization of the central sulcus using cortical multipolar electrodes and the N20 wave inversion technique. The location of all cortical and subcortical stimulated points with positive motor response was stored in the navigator and correlated with the cortical or subcortical motor functional structures defined preoperatively. RESULTS: The mean tumoral volumetric resection was 89.1±14.2% of the preoperative volume, with a total resection (≥100%) in twelve patients. Preoperatively a total of 58.8% of the patients had some motor deficit, increasing 24 hours after surgery to 76.5% and decreasing to 41.1% a month later. There was a great correlation between anatomic and functional data, both cortically and subcortically. However, in six cases it was not possible to identify the central sulcus and in many cases fMRI gave contradictory information. A total of 52 cortical points submitted to CS had positive motor response, with a positive correlation of 83.7%. Also, a total of 55 subcortical points had positive motor response, being in these cases 7.3±3.1 mm the mean distance from the stimulated point to the subcortical tract. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of preoperative and intraoperative anatomic and functional studies allows a safe functional resection of the brain tumors located in eloquent areas, compared to the tumoral resection based on anatomic imaging studies. Multimodal navigation allows the integration and correlation among preoperative and intraoperative anatomic and functional data. Cortical motor functional areas are anatomically and functionally located preoperatively thanks to MRI and fMRI and subcortical motor pathways with TDI and tractography. Intraoperative confirmation is done with CS and N20 inversion wave for cortical structures and with sCS for subcortical pathways. With this protocol we achieved a mean of 90% of volumetric resection in cortical and subcortical tumors located in eloquent motor areas with an increase of neurological deficits in the immediate postoperative period that significantly decreased one month later. Ongoing studies will define the safe limits for functional resection taking into account the intraoperative brain shift. Finally, it must be demonstrated if this protocol has any benefit for patients concerning disease free or overall survival.

Tratamiento de los tumores cerebrales intrínsecos de áreas motoras elocuentes. Resultados de un protocolo basado en la navegación, tractografía y monitorizaciónneurofisiológica de estructuras corticales y subcorticales / Treatment of intrinsic brain tumors located in motor eloquent areas. results of a protocol based in navegation, tractography and neurophysiological monitoring of cortical and subcortical structures

Objetivos. El papel actual del tratamiento microquirúrgicode los tumores cerebrales intrínsecos se basaen alcanzar la máxima resección volumétrica del tumorminimizando la morbilidad postoperatoria. El propósitodel trabajo es estudiar los beneficios de un protocolodiseñado para tratar tumores localizados en áreaselocuentes motoras, en el que se incluye la navegación yla estimulación de tractos motores subcorticales.Material y métodos. Se han incluido 17 pacientescon tumores corticales y subcorticales de área motoratratados quirúrgicamente. Para la planificación preoperatoriase fusionaron en el sistema de navegaciónestudios anatómicos, de resonancia funcional motora(RNM-f) y los tractos subcorticales generados porestudios de tensor de difusión (DTI). La monitorizaciónintraoperatoria incluía el mapeo motor por estimulacióncortical y subcortical directa (ECD y EsCD) e identificacióndel surco central por inversión de la onda N20con electrodos corticales multipolares. La localizaciónde los puntos con respuesta positiva a la ECD o EsCD secorrelacionaba con las áreas corticales o tractos funcionalesmotores definidos en los estudios preoperatoriosgracias al navegador.Resultados. La resección volumétrica tumoral mediafue del 89.1±14.2% del volumen tumoral calculado enlos estudios preoperatorios, con resección total (≥100%)en doce pacientes. En el preoperatorio había focalidadneurológica deficitaria motora en el 58.8% de lospacientes, que aumentó al 76.5% a las 24 horas de lacirugía y se redujo a los 30 días al 41.1%. Hubo una (..) (AU)

Objectives. The role of the microsurgical managementof intrinsic brain tumors is to maximize the volumetricresection of the tumoral tissue minimizing thepostoperative morbidity. The purpose of our paper hasbeen to study the benefits of an original protocol developedfor the microsurgical treatment of tumors locatedin eloquent motor areas where the navigation and electricalstimulation of motor subcortical pathways havebeen implemented.Materials and methods. A total of 17 patients operatedon for resection of cortical or subcortical tumors inmotor areas were included in the series. Preoperativeplanning for multimodal navigation was done integratinganatomic studies, motor functional MRI (f-MRI)and subcortical pathways volumes generated by diffusiontensor imaging (DTI). Intraoperative neuromonitorizationincluded motor mapping by direct corticaland subcortical electrical stimulation (CS and sCS) andlocalization of the central sulcus using cortical multipolarelectrodes and the N20 wave inversion technique.The location of all cortical and subcortical stimulatedpoints with positive motor response was stored in thenavigator and correlated with the cortical or subcorticalmotor functional structures defined preoperatively.Results. The mean tumoral volumetric resection (..) (AU)

[System of dynamic neutralization in the lumbar spine: experience on 94 cases]. / Sistema de neutralización dinámica en la coluna lumbar. SISTEMA DYNESYS. Experiencia en 94 casos

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results obtained using the Dynesys system (Dynamic Neutralisation System for the spine), in a group of 94 patients. This new system for treating lumbar degenerative pathologies is based on lumbar stabilisation and preservation of articular function, as opposed to traditional arthrodesis restrictions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyze series of 94 patients in whom this system was used. 62 were males and 32 females with an average age of 46.4 years. The pathologies treated were disc herniation in 27 cases, degenerative discopathy in 54 cases and lumbar channel stenosis in 13 cases. Follow-up was carried out between 14 and 24 months, assessing the clinical picture according to the Oswestry scale and the return to work. RESULTS: The final results on the Oswestry scale were 21.4% with respect to 56.8% prior to the treatment and the return to work was 82%. There was a remission of the sciatica symptoms in almost all the cases, as well as of the lumbar pain, and there was a 60% improvement in the claudication cases. With regard to complications, we would like to point out two cases due to the technique, one because of the wrong positioning of the screws and the other due to the rupture of the pedicle. There were two cases of subcutaneous seroma and two late subclinical infections. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic neutralisation obtained using this system, should not be considered as an arthrodesis. Treatment using Dynesys enlarges the population of patients candidates for surgery to who initially do not apparently need a standard fixation, but who raise doubt regarding the application of techniques without instrumental support, incorporating the functionality concept as opposed to restricting movement. This system can be defined as a disc prosthesis fitted externally to the disc. We have obtained good results in the majority of our patients, although we believe that the follow-up should be increased.

Sistema de neutralización dinámica en la columna lumbar. SISTEMA DYNESYS Experiencia en 94 casos / System of dynamic neutralization in the lumbar spine. Experience on 94 cases

Objetivo. Valorar los resultados obtenidos con la utilización del sistema Dynesys (Dynamic Neutralización System for the spine), en un grupo de 94 pacientes, como nuevo concepto para el tratamiento de la patología degenerativa lumbar basado en la estabilización lumbar con conservación de la función articular encontrar de la restricción de la artrodesis clásica. Material y métodos. Presentamos 94 pacientes en los que se utilizó este sistema de los cuales 62 fueron hombres y 32 mujeres con una edad media de 46.4 años. La patología de los pacientes fue de hernia discal en 27casos, discopatía degenerativa en 54 casos y estenosis decanal en 13 casos. Se realizó un seguimiento entre 14 t24 meses valorando la clínica según la escala de Oswestry y la reincorporación al trabajo. Resultados. Los resultados en la escala de Oswestry fue del 21.4% definitivo con respecto al 56.8% previo al tratamiento y la reincorporación al trabajo fue del82%. El cuadro ciático ha remitido prácticamente en todos los casos, así como la lumbalgia y una mejoría del60% en casos de claudicación. Como complicaciones reseñamos dos casos debidas a la técnica, con mal posición de tornillos en un caso y rotura pedicular en otro, dos casos de seroma subcutáneo y dos infecciones subclínicastardías. Conclusiones. La neutralización dinámica obtenida mediante este sistema, no debe ser considerada como una artrodesis. El tratamiento con Dynesys amplía la población de pacientes en los que se puede intervenir a aquellos que en principio no son tributarios de una fijación estándar, pero que planteaban dudas al cirujano al aplicar técnicas sin apoyo instrumental, incorporando el concepto de funcionalidad frente a la restricción del movimiento. Se puede definir como una prótesis díscal colocada extra-discalmente. Hemos obtenido un buen resultado en la mayoría de nuestros pacientes, aunque pensamos que es preciso ampliar el tiempo de seguimiento

Objective. To assess the results obtained using the Dynesys system (Dynamic Neutralisation System for the spine), in a group of 94 patients This new system for treating lumbar degenerative pathologie is based on lumbar stabilisation and preservation of articular function, as opposed to traditional arthrodesis restrictions. Material and methods. We analyze series of 94 patients in whom this system was used. 62 were males and 32females with an average age of 46,4 years. The pathologies streated were disc herniation in 27 cases, degenerative discopathy in 54 cases and lumbar channel stenosis in 13 cases. Follow-up was carried out between 14 and24 months, assessing the clinical picture according to the Oswestry scale and the return to work. Results. The final results on the Oswestry scale were21,4% with respect to 56,8% prior to the treatment and the return to work was 82%. There was a remission of the sciatica symptoms in almost all the cases, as well as of the lumbar pain, and there was a 60% improvement in the claudication cases. With regard to complications, we would like to point out two cases due to the technique, one because of the wrong positioning of the screws and the other due to the rupture of the pedicle. There were two cases of subcutaneous seroma and two late subclinical infections. Conclusions. The dynamic neutralisation obtained using this system, should not be considered as an arthrodesis. Treatment using Dynesys enlarges the population of patients candidates for surgery to who initially do not apparently need a standard fixation, but who raise doubt regarding the application of techniques without instrumental support, incorporating the functionality concept as opposed to restricting movement. This system can be defined as a disc prosthesis fitted externally to the disc. We have obtained good results in the majority of our patients, although we believe hut the follow-up should be increased