An increase in serum tryptase even below 11.4 ng/mL may indicate a mast cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction: a prospective study in Hymenoptera venom allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: During a systemic hypersensitivity reaction (SR), an increase in serum tryptase compared to the baseline value is an indicator of mast cell activation, most often due to an IgE-mediated mechanism. OBJECTIVE: To study the relevance of an increase in serum tryptase below the upper normal value of 11.4 ng/mL. METHODS: Serum tryptase levels were measured in 35 patients with Hymenoptera venom hypersensitivity before and during venom exposure. Of these, 20 developed SR to stings or following venom injections during immunotherapy (reactors), while 15 tolerated reexposure to stings or venom injections during immunotherapy without SR (non-reactors). Serum tryptase was estimated at 2, 5 and 24 h after exposure and was compared to a baseline value obtained before or at least 72 h after exposure. RESULTS: Considering circadian variation of serum tryptase, a relative increase to ≥135% of the baseline value (relative delta bound) was defined to indicate mast cell activation. Such an increase was observed in 17 of 20 reactors (85%), but none of 15 non-reactors. A serum tryptase of ≥11.4 ng/mL following venom exposure was observed in eight of the 20 reactors (40%) and 2 (13.3%) of the 15 non-reactors. Both these non-reactors also had an elevated baseline serum tryptase. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Serum tryptase values obtained during a suspected hypersensitivity reaction must always be compared to a baseline value. A relative tryptase increase to ≥135% of the baseline value during a suspected hypersensitivity reaction indicates mast cell activation even below 11.4 ng/mL.

Twelve-year follow-up after discontinuation of preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy in childhood.

BACKGROUND: In a previous controlled study, we demonstrated that preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy for 3 years was effective in children. Moreover, a significant clinical benefit could still be observed 6 years after discontinuation of specific immunotherapy (SIT). In the current study, we examined the same group of patients again to investigate whether there is a prolonged benefit 12 years after SIT is stopped. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with previous SIT (from 1989 through 1991) or standardized seasonal pharmacotherapy only were prospectively followed during the grass pollen season of 2003. Primary end points were symptom score, medication use, and combined symptom and medication score. In addition, skin prick test reactivity, development of new sensitizations, and prevalence of seasonal asthma were evaluated. RESULTS: Total hay fever symptom score (P < 0.03), use of medication (P < 0.05), and combined symptom and medication score (P < 0.03) remained lower in patients with previous SIT when compared with the control group. Decreased immediate skin response to grass pollen returned 12 years after cessation of SIT. The percentage of new sensitization, however, continued to be significantly smaller in patients with previous SIT (58%) compared with the controls (100%, P < 0.05). There was a tendency for lower prevalence of seasonal asthma in the post-SIT group (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: This prospective controlled prolonged follow-up study demonstrates the ongoing clinical benefit 12 years after discontinuation of SIT. Furthermore, the reduction in onset of new sensitization, which was found 6 years after discontinuation of SIT, is sustained 6 years later.