Fluoxetine and ketamine trigger the p75NTR proteolytic pathway and enhance extinction memory and brain plasticity through p75NTR.

BACKGROUND: Diverse antidepressants were recently described to bind to TrkB and drive a positive allosteric modulation of endogenous BDNF. Although neurotrophins such as BDNF can bind to the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR), their precursors are the high affinity p75NTR ligands. While part of an unrelated receptor family capable of inducing completely opposite physiological changes, TrkB and p75NTR feature a cross-like conformation dimer and carry a cholesterol-recognition and alignment consensus in the transmembrane domain. Since such qualities were found crucial for antidepressants to bind to TrkB and drive behavioral and neuroplasticity effects, we hypothesized that their effects might also depend on p75NTR. METHODS: ELISA-based binding assay and NMR spectroscopy were accomplished to assess whether antidepressants would bind to p75NTR. HEK293T cells and a variety of in vitro assays were used to address whether fluoxetine (FLX) or ketamine (KET) would trigger any α- and γ-secretase-dependent p75NTR proteolysis, and lead to p75NTR nuclear localization. Ocular dominance shift was performed with male and female p75KO mice to study the effects of KET and FLX on brain plasticity, in addition to pharmacological interventions to verifying how p75NTR signaling is important for the effects of KET and FLX in enhancing extinction memory in male WT mice and rats. RESULTS: Antidepressants were found binding to p75NTR, FLX and KET triggered the p75NTR proteolytic pathway and induced p75NTR-dependent behavioral/neuroplasticity changes. CONCLUSION: We thus hypothesize that antidepressants co-opt both BDNF/TrkB and proBDNF/p75NTR systems to induce a more efficient activity-dependent synaptic competition, thereby boosting the brain ability for remodeling.

Contextual fear expression engages a complex set of interactions between ventromedial prefrontal cortex cholinergic, glutamatergic, nitrergic and cannabinergic signaling.

Rats re-exposed to an environment previously associated with the onset of shocks evoke a set of conditioned defensive responses in preparation to an eventual flight or fight reaction. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is mutually important for controlling the behavioral/physiological consequences of stress exposure and the one's ability to satisfactorily undergo spatial navigation. While cholinergic, cannabinergic and glutamatergic/nitrergic neurotransmissions within the vmPFC are shown as important for modulating both behavioral and autonomic defensive responses, there is a gap on how these systems would interact to ultimately coordinate such conditioned reactions. Then, males Wistar rats had guide cannulas bilaterally implanted to allow drugs to be administered in vmPFC 10 min before their re-exposure to the conditioning chamber where three shocks were delivered at the intensity of 0.85 mA for 2 s two days ago. A femoral catheter was implanted for cardiovascular recordings the day before fear retrieval test. It was found that the increment of freezing behavior and autonomic responses induced by vmPFC infusion of neostigmine (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) were prevented by prior infusion of a transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) antagonist, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, nitric oxide scavenger and soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor. A type 3 muscarinic receptor antagonist was unable to prevent the boosting in conditioned responses triggered by a TRPV1 agonist and a cannabinoid receptors type 1 antagonist. Altogether, our results suggest that expression of contextual conditioned responses involves a complex set of signaling steps comprising different but complementary neurotransmitter pathways.

Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis CB1 receptors and the FAAH enzyme modulate anxiety behavior depending on previous stress exposure.

The endocannabinoid (eCB) anandamide (AEA) is synthesized on-demand in the post-synaptic terminal and can act on presynaptic cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors, decreasing the release of neurotransmitters, including glutamate. AEA action is ended through enzymatic hydrolysis via FAAH (fatty acid amid hydrolase) in the post-synaptic neuron. eCB system molecules are widely expressed in brain areas involved in the modulation of fear and anxiety responses, including the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis (BNST), which is involved in the integration of autonomic, neuroendocrine, and behavioral regulation. The presence of the CB1 and FAAH was described in the BNST; however, their role in the modulation of defensive reactions is not fully comprehended. In the present work we aimed at investigating the role of AEA and CB1 receptors in the BNST in modulating anxiety-related behaviors. Adult male Wistar rats received local BNST injections of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (0.1-0.6 nmol) and/or the FAAH inhibitor (URB597; 0.001-0.1 nmol) and were evaluated in the elevated plus maze (EPM) test, with or without previous acute restraint stress (2 h) exposure, or in the contextual fear conditioning. We observed that although AM251 and URB597 had no effects on the EPM, they increased and decreased, respectively, the conditioned fear response. Supporting a possible influence of stress in these differences, URB597 was able to prevent the restraint stress-induced anxiogenic effect in the EPM. The present data, therefore, suggest that eCB signaling in the BNST is recruited during more aversive situations to counteract the stress effect.

Dorsal hippocampus cholinergic and nitrergic neurotransmission modulates the cardiac baroreflex function in rats.

Hippocampus is a limbic structure involved in the baroreflex and chemoreflex control that receives extensive cholinergic input from basal forebrain. Hippocampal muscarinic receptors activation by acetylcholine might evoke nitric oxide synthesis, which is an important neuromodulator of cardiovascular responses. Thus, we hypothesize that cholinergic and nitrergic neurotransmission within the DH modulates the baroreflex and chemoreflex function. We have used vasoactive drugs (phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside), and potassium cyanide infused peripherally to induce, respectively, baroreflex or chemoreflex responses in awake animals. Bilateral injection into the DH of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (neostigmine) reduced baroreflex responses. Meanwhile, the non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist (atropine) or the M1-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist increased baroreflex responses (pirenzepine). Furthermore, the neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (N-propyl) or the intracellular NO scavenger (carboxy-PTIO) increased baroreflex responses, as well as the selective inhibitor of NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase (ODQ), increased the baroreflex responses. Besides, bilateral administration of an ineffective dose of a neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor abolished the reduction in the baroreflex responses evoked by an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. On the other hand, we have demonstrated that hippocampal cholinergic neurotransmission did not influence the chemoreflex function. Taken together, our findings suggest that nNOS-derived nitric oxide in the DH participates in acetylcholine-evoked baroreflex responses.