RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Real-life data on the treatment of patients with mental health problems are important as a reference to evaluate care and benchmarking. This study describes the treatment of mental health problems in general practice as diagnosed by general practitioners (GP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on mental health problems were available from structured psychiatric interviews in the general population and data on mental health problems diagnosed by general practitioners. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment data were taken from patients records held electronically in general practices. RESULTS: GPs diagnosed a mental health problem in 13.2% of the 1,756 cases examined and 86% of these patients were treated by the GPs themselves. Of the 16% referrals, the majority were referred within primary care. Nearly all patients with a mental health problem received counseling or advice from their GP. Half of the patients with a medication-related disorder, a (single) mood disorder or an (single) anxiety disorder and all patients with a combined anxiety and depressive disorder received a prescription for psychotropic drugs (antidepressants and/or benzodiazepines). Nearly all patients with a sleep disorder received a prescription for benzodiazepine. In patients with psychosocial problems, 20% received benzodiazepines. CONCLUSION: The majority of mental health problems, when professionally treated, are treated in primary care. More than half the patients are treated with antidepressants and/or benzodiazepines. Most patients also receive supportive counseling or advice.
Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiolíticos/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Benchmarking , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The influence of adipose tissue thickness (ATT) on near-IR spectroscopy (NIRS) measurements in vivo was studied in the human flexor digitorum superficialis muscle at rest and during sustained isometric handgrip exercise. NIRS was used for the quantitative measurement of muscle O(2) consumption (mV.O(2)) and forearm blood flow (FBF) in 78 healthy subjects. Skinfold thickness ranged from 1.4 to 8.9 mm within the group. Resting mV.O(2) was 0.11+/-0.04 ml of O(2).min(-1).100 g(-1), and FBF was 1.28+/-0.82 ml.min(-1).100 ml(-1). There was a negative correlation (r=-0.70, P< or =0.01), indicating a decrease in mV.O(2) with increasing ATT. mV.O(2) in the 10 leanest subjects appeared to be twice as high as that in the 10 subjects with the highest ATT. A poor correlation (r=0.29, P< or =0.01) was found between ATT and FBF. The gender difference that we found for mV.O(2) was due to the difference in ATT between female and male subjects. No correlation was found between maximum voluntary contraction and mV.O(2), nor between maximum voluntary contraction and ATT, indicating that the contraction force did not confound our results. These results show that ATT has a substantial confounding influence on in vivo NIRS measurements, and that it is essential to incorporate this factor into future NIRS muscle studies in order to justify comparisons between different groups. To facilitate such comparisons, upper and lower boundaries for normal values of mV.O(2) and FBF in relation to ATT are presented.