Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 53(6): 102764, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women was the subject of many questions since the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We aim to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection contracted during 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy during the first two COVID-19 waves across a prospective French multicenter cohort study. Patients were included between April 2020 and January 2021 in 10 maternity hospitals in Paris area with two groups (i) pregnant women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR between [14WG; 37WG[(symptomatic infection), (ii) pregnant women with a negative serology (or equivocal) at delivery and without a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR at any time during pregnancy (G2 group) MAIN FINDINGS: 2410 pregnant women were included, of whom 310 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR and 217 between [14WG; 37WG[. Most infections occurred between 28 and 37 weeks of gestation (56 %). Most patients could be managed as outpatients, while 23 % had to be hospitalized. Among women with a positive RT-PCR, multiparous women were over-represented (OR = 2.45[1.52;3.87]); were more likely to deliver before 37 weeks of gestation (OR = 2.19[1.44;3.24]) and overall cesarean deliveries were significantly increased (OR = 1.53[1.09;2.13]). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal burden associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections during the first two pandemic waves before availability of vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04355234 (registration date: 21/04/2020).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Prospectivos , Recém-Nascido , França/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/estatística & dados numéricos , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 162(3): 889-894, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36825331

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of prophylactic carbetocin with prophylactic oxytocin for preventing severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following vaginal delivery. METHODS: This before and after cohort study took place between 2020 and 2021 in a university maternity hospital. In 2021, the protocol for PPH prevention immediately after vaginal delivery changed: intravenous oxytocin (5 IU) was replaced by intravenous carbetocin (100 µg). All patients with vaginal births were included, with two groups compared: patients who received prophylactic oxytocin in 2020 and those who received prophylactic carbetocin in 2021. The primary outcome was severe PPH, defined as one or more of the following: estimated blood loss ≥1500 mL, transfusion ≥4 units of red blood cells, Bakri balloon use, embolization, vascular ligation, hysterectomy, and maternal death. RESULTS: Among 4832 women included, 2417 received oxytocin and 2415 received carbetocin. The rate of severe PPH was similar in both groups (0.5% vs. 0.6%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.8 [95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.8]). The rate of PPH ≥500 mL was lower in the carbetocin group (4% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Although prophylactic carbetocin was associated with a reduction in the rate of PPH ≥500 mL, carbetocin is no different to oxytocin in preventing severe PPH caused by atony after vaginal delivery.


Assuntos
Ocitocina , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos
4.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 50(7): 102041, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33310133

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is not known. COVIPREG is a prospective French multicenter study to assess the seroprevalence at the time of delivery and the maternal and neonatal impact of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. In order to study factors associated with poor outcomes after COVID-19 Infection during pregnancy and adapt the sample size of the study, a preliminary assessment of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG was planned after 500 inclusions in a one perinatal center of Paris area. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response in pregnant women at the time of delivery during the COVID-19 pandemia. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study at Cochin hospital (Level III maternity). Patients admitted for delivery were offered to participate to the study. Each patient participating to the study was tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies using a commercially available ELISA. RESULTS: Among the 529 patients included in the COVIPREG study between April 29 and June 26, 529 were assessed for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response and 25 had a positive test, ie 4.7 % with a confidence interval at 95 % [3.0 %-6.9 %]). CONCLUSIONS: Four months after the beginning of the infection in Paris, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in pregnant women at the time of delivery is low. Studies evaluating the impact of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy should take this information in account in order to adapt the sample size.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Paris/epidemiologia , Parto , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
5.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 22(3): 242-7, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20386442

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe data on the effects of uterine artery embolization (UAE) on fertility. RECENT FINDINGS: UAE is used to treat postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and fibroids. This effective therapy is replacing surgery in many cases. One of the main goals of UAE is to preserve the uterus and therefore fertility (pregnancies, menses and ovarian reserve). Pregnancies after this technique have been described. The main complications encountered during these pregnancies are not only PPH but also miscarriages and cesarean deliveries after UAE for fibroids. Conflicting results varying from completely well tolerated to serious complications such as definitive negative effect on endometrium and ovary function have been reported. Nevertheless, the series differ in that they included women of different ages and used different material for vessel occlusion (definitive microparticles of varying sizes, temporary pledgets of gelatine sponge, etc.). We discuss the impact of these differences on uterus vascularization and fertility. SUMMARY: UAE is an effective treatment for PPH and fibroids. Pregnancy is possible after UAE. Recurrent PPH is a serious and frequent complication. Synechia is also a potential complication. Desire of childbearing should be considered when choosing embolization or surgery and, in case of embolization, the choice of material used. Further studies on future fertility after UAE are needed as well as information on fertility after surgery.


Assuntos
Fertilidade , Embolização da Artéria Uterina , Feminino , Humanos , Leiomioma/terapia , Ciclo Menstrual , Seleção de Pacientes , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...