Image Contrast and Spectral Transmission in Intraocular Lenses with Nd:YAG Pits.

PURPOSE: Neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy is considered as safe and effective method in the treatment of posterior capsule opacification. Nevertheless, side effects are described. The incorrectly adjusted focus of the laser beam during the procedure can lead to so-called YAG-pits or YAG-shots. In this experimental study, we measured spectral transmission to evaluate the image contrast and analyze the impact of YAG-pits in intraocular lenses (IOL). METHODS: Acrylic, foldable, one-piece IOLs with 6.0 mm optic and different material properties were studied. These included: monofocal IOLs and enhanced monofocal IOLs with water content of 0.3%, 26.0%, and 4.0% and a refractive index of 1.49, 1.46, and 1.54, respectively. All measurements were done with new, unaltered IOLs and IOLs with YAG-pits. Damage was intentionally created, performing YAG-pits (n = 7) in the central zone (3.5 mm) using a photodisruption laser (2.0mJ). All laboratory measurements were repeated: These included surface topography characterization, United States Air Force (USAF) resolution test chart analysis, spectral transmittance measurements and through focus contrast measurement. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the unaltered lenses and lenses with defects. The YAG-pits within the optic of the IOLs decreased the image contrast and spectral transmission and changed results of USAF test images at the focal position by 62%, 57% and 54%, respectively. In all IOLs a reduction of the relative intensity of total transmitted light was observed between 450 and 700 nm wavelength. CONCLUSION: This experimental study confirmed that the IOL image performance deteriorates with YAG-pits. The total intensity of transmitted light or transmittance (without scattering) was reduced in the wavelength between 450 and 700 nm. The contrast was significantly reduced and USAF test targets showed much worse results compared to unmodified counterparts. There was no systematic difference between monofocal and enhanced monofocal lenses. Further experiments should investigate the effect of YAG-pits on diffractive IOLs.

Micro-Computed Tomography (µCT) as a Tool for High-Resolution 3D Imaging and Analysis of Intraocular Lenses: Feasibility and Proof of the Methodology to Evaluate YAG Pits.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is the most frequent late sequelae after successful cataract surgery. Neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy is considered the gold standard and a well-accepted, safe, and effective measure in treating PCO. However, iatrogenic damage of the intraocular lens (IOL) due to inappropriate focusing is a quite common side effect. These permanent defects (YAG pits) can critically affect overall optical quality. METHODS: In this laboratory study, we used the micro-computed tomography (µCT) technique to obtain high-resolution 3D images of the lens and the YAG pits. RESULTS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of a detailed analysis of IOLs with µCT technology. This non-destructive technique seems to be ideal for comparative studies, measuring dimensions of the damage, and visualizing shooting channels within the material. CONCLUSION: µCT is excellently suited to examine an IOL in detail, analyze optics and haptics in three dimensions, and to describe all kinds of changes within the IOL without damaging it.

Evaluating impact of Nd: YAG laser associated defects on optical quality of hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses using visualization of light propagation and USAF test targets.

BACKGROUND: Neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy is a well-accepted, safe, and effective measure in the treatment of posterior capsule opacification. However, iatrogenic intraocular lens damage is a relatively common side effect that happens due to inappropriate focusing during the procedure. This experimental study analyzes the impact of YAG-pits to obtain qualitative information. METHODS: Acrylic, monofocal hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses (IOLs) with 6.0 mm optic and the with the same power (21D) were studied. First, all measurements were done with unmodified IOLs. Damage was intentionally created, performing YAG-pits (n = 5) in the central area of the lens optic (3.0 mm) using a photodisruption laser with the same energy level of 1.8 mJ. To simulate the cruciate pattern, the 5 defects were created in a cross shape within the 3.0 mm optical zone. Afterwards, all laboratory measurements were repeated: These included the United States Air Force (USAF) resolution test chart to study the imaging performance of the IOL, light field measurements to show the course of the rays behind the IOL and the modulation transfer function (MTF) measurements were analyzed. RESULTS: Evaluating USAF showed that unmodified lenses produced a sharper image. Damaged lenses led to a more blurred image and to the impression of a lower contrast with a kind of halo/glare effect. The light field measurement showed that YAG-pits led to a kind of dispersion and scattering effect, which was higher in hydrophobic IOLs. MTF showed a deterioration in damaged hydrophilic and hydrophobic IOLs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our experimental study confirms that YAG-pits can reduce imaging quality of intraocular lenses. These defects behave as a new Huygens source, distribute a spherical wave that additionally illuminate the background of the USAF target. It can be assumed that material properties of the IOL (water content, refractive index) play an important role and affect results. The impact level is strongly dependent on the number, size and position of YAG-pits within the optic. LIMITATION: Only monofocal IOLs have been investigated so far, further tests with various IOL optics have to follow. In addition, simulating the circular pattern of YAG capsulotomy is necessary.

Analysis of a novel hydrophobic acrylic enhanced monofocal intraocular lens compared to its standard monofocal type on the optical bench.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this laboratory study is to objectively analyze the new hydrophobic, acrylic, enhanced monofocal intraocular lens Acunex Quantum (AN6Q) and compare it with the monofocal platform Acunex AN6.  METHODS: Two IOL models were analyzed (Acunex Quantum AN6Q and Acunex AN6, Teleon Surgical, Spankeren, Netherlands), each having the same refractive power of + 22.0 D, on the optical bench with the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2. The measurements followed the guidelines of the International Standard Organization with following parameters: ISO 2 cornea (+ 0,28 µ), ISO 11979/2, lens placement in situ in NaCl with 35° temperature, 546 nm and selection of different aperture sizes (3.0 mm vs 4.5 mm). The aberrations of each IOL were evaluated by the WaveMaster IOL 2, a high-resolution Shack-Hartmann sensor in reverse projection setup. An in-situ model eye was used according to ISO 11979 in NaCl (n = 1.337) with 546 nm, mask width 4.51. Zernike polynomials up to 10th order were determined by means of the measured wavefront that describe the optical properties of the IOL. RESULTS: Through frequency modulation transfer function (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AN6Q/AN6 centered) was 0.687/0.731 (3.0 mm aperture) and 0.400/0.509 (4.5 mm aperture). The SR (mean) was 0.592/0.809 (3.0 mm) and 0.332/0.372 (4.5 mm). The MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AN6Q/AN6 decentered by 1 mm) was 0.413/0.478 (3.0 mm) and 0.257/0.229 (4.5 mm). The SR (mean) was 0.393/0.404 (3.0 mm) and 0.183/0.212 (4.5 mm). The MTF (mean) at 50 lp/mm (AN6Q/AN6 tilted by 5°) was 0.508/0.710 (3.0 mm) and 0.337/0.513 (4.5 mm). The SR (mean) was 0.508/0.760 (3.0 mm) and 0.235/0.2372 (4.5 mm). AN6Q showed MTF peak of 0.55 with an enlarged depth of power of about 2.5 D and two cusps in the MTF curve. The spherical aberration Z 4-0 was about -0.21 µm and the secondary spherical aberration Z 6-0 was about 0.16 µm. No other relevant aberration showed up. CONCLUSION: The new, enhanced monofocal AN6Q provides an extended range of focus with only slight decrease in contrast quality. Both types of the hydrophobic, acrylic Acunex IOL platform have its particular advantages in clinical settings and therefore its importance, respectively.