Cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for hepatitis C in The Netherlands.

On account of the serious complications of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and the improved treatment possibilities, the need to improve HCV awareness and case-finding is increasingly recognized. To optimize a future national campaign with this objective, three pilot campaigns were executed in three regions in The Netherlands. One campaign was aimed at the general population, a second (similar) campaign was extended with a support programme for primary care and a third campaign was specifically aimed at hard-drug users. Data from the pilot campaigns were used to build a mathematical model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the different campaigns. The campaign aimed at the general public without support for primary care did not improve case-finding and was therefore not cost-effective. The similar campaign accompanied by additional support for primary care and the campaign aimed at hard-drug users emerged as cost-effective interventions for identification of HCV carriers.

Survival after transfusion in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness analyses of blood safety interventions require estimates of the life expectancy after blood product transfusion. These are best derived from survival after blood transfusion, per age group and blood component type. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In the PROTON (PROfiles of TransfusiON recipients) study transfusion recipient data was collected from a hospital sample covering 28% of the total blood use between 1996 and 2006 in the Netherlands. The dataset includes date of transfusion, blood component type transfused and recipient identification details. PROTON data were individually matched to mortality data of the Netherlands. Survival after first transfusion and after any transfusion was calculated, per blood component type and age group. PROTON mortality rates were compared to mortality rates in the general population. The results were used to estimate survival beyond the study period and to estimate life expectancy after transfusion. RESULTS: Of all 2,405,012 blood product transfusions in the PROTON dataset, 92% was matched to the national Dutch Municipal Population Register, which registers all deaths. After 1 year, survival after any transfusion was 65·4%, 70·4% and 53·9% for RBC, FFP and PLT respectively. After 5 years, this was 46·6%, 58·8% and 39·3% for RBC, FFP and PLT, respectively. Ten years after transfusion, mortality rates of recipients are still elevated in comparison with the general population. CONCLUSION: Mortality rates of transfusion recipients are higher than those of the general population, but the increase diminishes over time. The mortality rates found for the Netherlands are lower than those found in comparable studies for other countries.

The PROTON study: profiles of blood product transfusion recipients in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion recipient data are needed for correct estimation of cost-effectiveness in terms of recipient outcomes after transfusion. Also, such data are essential for monitoring blood use, estimation of future blood use and benchmarking. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A sample of 20 of 93 Dutch hospitals was selected. Datasets containing all blood product transfusions between 1996 and 2006 were extracted from hospital blood bank computer systems, containing transfusion date, blood product type and recipient characteristics such as gender, address, date of birth. The datasets were appended and matched to national hospitalization datasets including primary discharge diagnoses (ICD-9). Using these data, we estimated distributions of blood recipient characteristics in the Netherlands. RESULTS: The dataset contains information on 290,043 patients who received 2,405,012 blood products (1,720,075 RBC, 443,697 FFP, 241,240 PLT) from 1996 to 2006. This is 28% of total blood use in the Netherlands during this period. Comparable diagnosis and age distributions of all hospitalizations indicate included hospitals to be representative, per hospital category, for the Netherlands. Of all red blood cells (RBC), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (PLT), respectively 1.7%, 2.5% and 4.5% were transfused to neonates. Recipients of 65 years or older received 57.6% of RBC, 41.4% of FFP and 29.0% of PLT. Most of the blood products were transfused to patients with diseases of the circulary system (25.1%) or neoplasms (22.0%). CONCLUSION: Transfusion data from a limited sample of hospitals can be used to estimate national distributions of blood recipient characteristics.

Cost-effectiveness of additional hepatitis B virus nucleic acid testing of individual donations or minipools of six donations in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: To further reduce the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by blood transfusion, nucleic acid testing (NAT) can be employed. The aim of this study is to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the Netherlands of employing a triplex NAT assay aimed at HBV nucleic acid detection in individual donations (ID-NAT) or in minipools of 6 donations (MP-6-NAT), compared to a triplex NAT assay in minipools of 24 donations (MP-24-NAT). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A mathematical model was made of the whole transfusion chain from donors to recipients of blood in the Netherlands. The annual number of avoided HBV transmissions was estimated with the window-period incidence model. The natural history of a HBV infection in recipients is described by a Markov model. RESULTS: The ICER of adding HBV MP-6-NAT or HBV ID-NAT in the Netherlands is Euro303,218 (95% confidence interval [CI], Euro233,001-Euro408,388) and Euro518,995 (95% CI, Euro399,359-Euro699,120) per quality-adjusted life-year, respectively. The ICER strongly correlates with the age of transfusion recipients. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of additional HBV NAT is limited by the limited loss of life caused by HBV transmission. Despite a higher effectiveness, HBV ID-NAT is less cost-effective than MP-6-NAT due to higher costs. A future equivalent participation of immigrants from HBV-endemic countries in the donor base renders HBV NAT only slightly more cost-effective.