[Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults(LADA): part of the clinical spectrum of type-1 diabetes mellitus of autoimmune origin]. / A lassan kialakuló felnóttkori autoimmun diabetes (LADA): az autoimmun eredetú 1-es típusú cukorbetegség klinikai spektrumának része.

According to the most recent classification of diabetes mellitus the latent autoimmune diabetes in adults belongs to the group of type 1 autoimmune diabetes mellitus, as a slowly progressive form. It is not clear whether LADA is a distinct clinical entity or it is a part of the clinical spectrum of type 1 diabetes mellitus. The authors compare the antropologic (body mass index, waist to hip ratio), immunologic (occurrence of islet cell cytoplasmic autoantibodies and autoantibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase and tyrosin phosphatase), genetic (HLA DR and DQ alleles known to be associated to type 1 diabetes mellitus) characteristics and occurrence of the features of the metabolic syndrome in the groups of type 1 and type 2 diabetes and LADA. 81 type 1 and 190 type 2 diabetics and 38 LADA patients were involved into the study. Freshly diagnosed type 1 diabetics served for controls of the autoantibody study: 48 patients manifested < or = 16 years of age and 89 type 1 diabetics manifested above 16 years of age. The three main diabetic groups differed in age: the average age in the type 1, type 2 and LADA groups were 37, 63 and 58 years respectively. There was no difference among the three groups in gender. The duration of the disease differed significantly between the type 2 and LADA groups (4.0 and 8.0 years respectively). In spite of the shorter duration of the disease in the LADA group, compared to the type 2 diabetics the frequency of insulin dependency was significantly higher in the LADA (81.6%) than in the type 2 group (46.7%). The BMI and WHR were comparable between the type 1 and LADA patients (average values were 23 and 0.83 in type 1 patients and 23.25 and 0.89 in LADA). The type 2 group differed significantly from type 1 and LADA (average values were 29.1 and 0.5). The concentration of glycated hemoglobin was comparable in the three groups. But there was a significant difference in HbA1c concentration between the freshly diagnosed subgroups of type 1 and LADA patients: 10.85% and 8% respectively. The fasting C-peptid levels were significantly higher in the sera of type 2 diabetics (0.75 pmol/l) compared to type 1 (0.2 pmol/l) and LADA patients (0.29 pmol/l). There was a significant difference in C-peptid concentrations between the type 1 and LADA groups, too. The insulin deficiency in LADA seemed to be not as severe as in type 1 diabetes. The serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly higher and the HDL cholesterol concentration significantly lower in type 2 diabetics comparing to type 1 and LADA patients and there was no significant difference in this respect between the type 1 and LADA groups. The frequency of occurrence of hypertension differed no significantly between type 2 and LADA, but that of in type 1 diabetes was significantly lower than both type 2 and LADA. The occurrence of multiple autoantibodies (ICA + GADA + anti-IA2) was much more frequent in type 1 diabetes compared to LADA. In the sera of LADA patients the occurrence of ICA and GADA alone or ICA + GADA was characteristic (31.5% - 21.1% - 15.8% respectively). There was no difference between type 1 diabetes and LADA in the occurrence of the alleles of the MHC kown to be associated with type 1 diabetes. The occurrence of the haplotypes HLA DQ2/DR3 and/or DQ8/DR4 was observed in two thirds of type 1 diabetic and LADA patients. Chronic diabetic complications were observed in all of the groups and there was only a secondary connection of the complications with the type of the diabetes. Based on the results the authors suggest that LADA is a part of the clinical spectrum of type 1 diabetes of autoimmune origin.

[Detection of antibodies against pancreatic islet cells in clinical practice]. / Hasnyálmirigy-szigetsejt elleni antitestek vizsgálata a klinikai gyakorlatban.

Development of diabetes mellitus caused by pancreatic beta-cell destruction of autoimmune origin is the result of a long lasting process. The most easily examinable feature of this stage is the occurrence of the islet cell antibodies. The sera which are positive for islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies (ICA), examined by indirect immunofluorescence, contain a mixture of antibodies. The glutamic acid decarbocylase (GAD), the tyrosin phosphatase (IA2), the insulin, and the GM2-1 glycolipid can be the targets of these antibodies. One can routinely examine the ICA, the GADA, the IA2 antibodies. The detection of antibodies against insulin (IAA) and GM-2-1 glycolipid is not invented in the routine laboratory work. The aim of the authors was the evaluation of clinical significance of occurrence of islet cell antibodies: one hundred and eighteen nondiabetic children an adult human being without known diabetic first degree relatives and 366 type 1 diabetic children and adult patients served as controls. The authors evaluated the predictive value of the different islet cell antibodies to the development of type 1 diabetes mellitus in 596 nondiabetic children with type 1 diabetic first degree relatives. The authors looked for markers of beta-cell destruction among sera of 320 diabetics manifested after 30 years of age with at least half a year of non-insulin-dependency and in the sera of 68 females suffered from gestational diabetes after 0-14 years of the index pregnancy. Finally the authors report 7 cases in which the examination of islet cell antibodies helped the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Indirect immunofluorescence method was used for the detection of ICA, radioimmunoassay for that of GADA and IA2 antibodies. There was no positive reaction for ICA and GADA in the nondiabetic population without diabetic first degree relatives. Among the freshly diagnosed type 1 diabetic children 39% were positive for only ICA, 44% for only GADA and 80% for any antibodies. Among the freshly manifested type 1 diabetic adults ICA positivity only was observed in 21%, GADA positivity only in 7.1% and 93% for any antibodies. From the 595 nondiabetic children with type 1 diabetic first degree relatives 23 were positive for ICA, from whom 5 became diabetic during a two years observation period. These diabetic children had multiplex autoantibodies besides ICA. One child from this group, who was negative for ICA became diabetic, too. Among type 2 diabetic patients 13% were positive for ICA alone, 17% were positive for GADA alone and 27% were positive for any antibodies. The insulin dependency manifested in a short time was associated with antibody positivity. Among the gestational diabetics 10 were found positive for ICA. From them, 7 were type 1 diabetics, and 3 were type 2 diabetics at the time of the detection of antibodies. The authors suggest the need of determination of islet cell antibodies in the group of nondiabetic first degree relatives of type 1 diabetic patients (ICA, GADA, IA2 and IAA), in the group of non-insulin-dependent diabetics (ICA and GADA) as a screening for later insulin dependency, and in gestational diabetes after delivery (ICA) as screening for type 1 diabetes mellitus.