Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabetes Ther ; 12(7): 1915-1927, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080123

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Oral semaglutide is a novel tablet formulation of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue semaglutide. In two trials, the effects of prior food ingestion (food effect), post-dose fasting period and water volume with dosing (dosing conditions) on oral semaglutide pharmacokinetics were investigated. METHODS: Subjects received once-daily oral semaglutide for 10 days. In the food-effect trial, 78 healthy subjects were randomised 1:1:1 to fed (meal 30 min pre-dose; 240 mL water with dosing), fasting (overnight until 4 h post-dose; 240 mL) or reference (fasting overnight until 30 min post-dose; 120 mL) arms. In the dosing conditions trial, 161 healthy men were randomised into eight dosing groups (overnight fasted with 50/120 mL water and 15/30/60/120 min post-dose fasting). Semaglutide plasma concentrations were measured frequently until 504 h after the 10th dose. RESULTS: In the food-effect trial, limited or no measurable semaglutide exposure was observed in the fed arm, while all subjects in the fasting arm had measurable semaglutide exposure. Area under the semaglutide concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h,semaglutide,day10) and maximum semaglutide concentration (Cmax,semaglutide,day10) were numerically greater by approximately 40% for the fasting versus reference arm (p = 0.082 and p = 0.080, respectively). In the dosing conditions trial, AUC0-24h,semaglutide,day10 and Cmax,semaglutide,day10 were not different between water volumes (p = 0.541 and p = 0.676), but increased with longer post-dose fasting (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administration of oral semaglutide in the fasting state with up to 120 mL water and at least 30 min post-dose fasting results in clinically relevant semaglutide exposure. These dosing conditions have been used in the oral semaglutide phase 3 trials and are part of the approved label. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02172313, NCT01572753.

2.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 58(9): 1193-1203, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30945118

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oral semaglutide is a tablet co-formulation of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog semaglutide with the absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). The absorption of coadministered oral drugs may be altered due to enhancement by SNAC, potential gastric emptying delay by semaglutide, or other mechanisms. Two one-sequence crossover trials investigated the effect of oral semaglutide on the pharmacokinetics of lisinopril, warfarin, digoxin, and metformin. METHODS: In trial 1, 52 healthy subjects received lisinopril (20 mg single dose) or warfarin (25 mg single dose) with subsequent coadministration with SNAC alone (300 mg single dose), followed by oral semaglutide 20 mg once daily (steady state). In trial 2, 32 healthy subjects received digoxin (500 µg single dose) or metformin (850 mg twice daily for 4 days), with subsequent coadministration with SNAC alone followed by oral semaglutide, as in trial 1. RESULTS: There were no apparent effects of oral semaglutide on area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for lisinopril, warfarin, and digoxin. The AUC of metformin was increased by 32% (90% confidence interval 1.23-1.43) by oral semaglutide coadministration versus metformin alone, whereas the Cmax was unaffected. SNAC alone did not affect exposure of lisinopril, warfarin, digoxin, or metformin. Adverse events were in line with those previously observed for GLP-1 receptor agonists. CONCLUSIONS: Oral semaglutide or SNAC alone did not appear to affect the exposure of lisinopril, warfarin, or digoxin, and, based on its wide therapeutic index, the higher metformin exposure with oral semaglutide was not considered clinically relevant.


Assuntos
Caprilatos/administração & dosagem , Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/administração & dosagem , Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/farmacologia , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/farmacologia , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/farmacocinética , Anticoagulantes/farmacocinética , Cardiotônicos/farmacocinética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Cross-Over , Digoxina/farmacocinética , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/efeitos adversos , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/efeitos adversos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacocinética , Lisinopril/farmacocinética , Masculino , Metformina/farmacocinética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Varfarina/farmacocinética
3.
Sci Transl Med ; 10(467)2018 11 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30429357

RESUMO

Oral administration of therapeutic peptides is hindered by poor absorption across the gastrointestinal barrier and extensive degradation by proteolytic enzymes. Here, we investigated the absorption of orally delivered semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, coformulated with the absorption enhancer sodium N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) aminocaprylate] (SNAC) in a tablet. In contrast to intestinal absorption usually seen with small molecules, clinical and preclinical dog studies revealed that absorption of semaglutide takes place in the stomach, is confined to an area in close proximity to the tablet surface, and requires coformulation with SNAC. SNAC protects against enzymatic degradation via local buffering actions and only transiently enhances absorption. The mechanism of absorption is shown to be compound specific, transcellular, and without any evidence of effect on tight junctions. These data have implications for understanding how highly efficacious and specific therapeutic peptides could be transformed from injectable to tablet-based oral therapies.


Assuntos
Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/farmacologia , Absorção Intestinal , Estômago/fisiologia , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Membrana Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , Cães , Células Epiteliais/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Epiteliais/metabolismo , Mucosa Gástrica/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Gástrica/ultraestrutura , Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/análogos & derivados , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/metabolismo , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/farmacocinética , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ratos , Estômago/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
4.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 119(6): 523-532, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27685872

RESUMO

The Danish Society of Clinical Pharmacology was founded in 1976, and mainly thanks to the persistent efforts of the society, clinical pharmacology became an independent medical speciality in Denmark in 1996. Since then, clinical pharmacology has gone from strength to strength. In the Danish healthcare system, clinical pharmacology has established itself as an indispensible part of the efforts to promote the rational, safe and economic use of drugs. Clinical pharmacologists are active in drug committees both in hospitals and in the primary sector. All clinical pharmacology centres offer a local medicines information service. Some centres have established an adverse drug effect manager function. Only one centre offers a therapeutic drug monitoring service. Clinical pharmacologists are responsible for the toxicological advice at the Danish Poison Information Centre at Bispebjerg University Hospital in the Capital Region. The Department of Clinical Pharmacology at Aarhus University Hospital works closely together with forensic toxicologists and pathologists, covering issues regarding illicit substances, forensic pharmacology, post-mortem toxicology, expert testimony and research. Therapeutic geriatric and psychiatric teach-inns for specialist and junior doctors are among the newest initiatives organized by clinical pharmacologists. Clinical pharmacologists work also in the Danish Medicines Agency and in the Danish pharmaceutical industry, and the latter has in particular a great growth potential for creating new jobs and career opportunities for clinical pharmacologists. As of July 2016, the Danish Society of Clinical Pharmacology has 175 members, and 70 of these are specialists in clinical pharmacology corresponding to approximately 2.5 specialists per 1000 doctors (Denmark has in total 28,000 doctors) or approximately 12 specialists per one million inhabitants.


Assuntos
Farmacologia Clínica/história , Sociedades Científicas/história , Especialização/história , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Dinamarca , Indústria Farmacêutica , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/terapia , Toxicologia Forense/educação , Toxicologia Forense/história , Toxicologia Forense/tendências , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Serviços de Informação , Agências Internacionais , Internacionalidade , Farmacologia Clínica/educação , Farmacologia Clínica/tendências , Sociedades Científicas/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Recursos Humanos
5.
Oncologist ; 20(2): 196-201, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25616431

RESUMO

Axitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR-1), VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3. Based on the positive opinion from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union (EU) was issued for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after failure of prior treatment with sunitinib or a cytokine. The demonstration of clinical benefit for axitinib was based on a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of axitinib compared with sorafenib in patients with advanced RCC after failure of a prior systemic first-line regimen containing one or more of the following agents: sunitinib, bevacizumab plus interferon-α, temsirolimus, or cytokines. In the primary analysis, a 2-month increase in median progression-free survival (PFS) was observed for axitinib compared with sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.665; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.544-0.812; p < .0001). In the subgroup of patients with a prior cytokine-containing regimen, the increase in median PFS associated with axitinib was 5.4 months (updated analysis, HR: 0.519; 95% CI: 0.375-0.720; p < .0001). In the subgroup of patients with prior sunitinib treatment, the increase in median PFS was 1.4 months (updated analysis, HR: 0.736; 95% CI: 0.578-0.937; p = .0063). The analysis of overall survival showed no statistically significant survival benefit of axitinib over sorafenib in patients previously treated with cytokine-containing regimens (HR: 0.813; 95% CI: 0.556-1.191) or sunitinib (HR: 0.997; 95% CI: 0.782-1.270). The most common treatment-related adverse events associated with axitinib included diarrhea, hypertension, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, dysphonia, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. Most of these events were mild or moderate in severity. This paper summarizes the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary of product characteristics, are available on the EMA website (http://www.ema.europa.eu).


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Aprovação de Drogas , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Indazóis/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Axitinibe , Carcinoma de Células Renais/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Sunitinibe , Receptor 2 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor 2 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/genética , Receptor 3 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor 3 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/genética
6.
Oncologist ; 19(7): 766-73, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24928613

RESUMO

Pertuzumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the extracellular dimerization domain (subdomain II) of HER2. Based on the positive opinion from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on March 4, 2013, a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union (EU) was issued for pertuzumab (Perjeta) for use in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel for the treatment of adult patients with HER2-positive metastatic or locally recurrent unresectable breast cancer who have not received previous anti-HER2 therapy or chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. The demonstration of clinical benefit for pertuzumab was based on a single, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. In the primary analysis, median progression-free survival was 18.5 months in the pertuzumab group compared with 12.4 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.75; p < .0001). For the secondary endpoints, overall survival (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.52-0.84; p = .0008) and objective response rate (80.2% vs. 69.3%) were also favored in the pertuzumab group. Toxicity was similar between groups except for higher incidence of diarrhea, rash, mucosal inflammation, dry skin, and neutropenia for pertuzumab compared with placebo. This paper summarizes the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary of product characteristics, are available on the EMA website (http://www.ema.europa.eu).


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , União Europeia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Análise de Sobrevida
7.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(17): 4491-7, 2012 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22829199

RESUMO

The European Commission issued on March 17, 2011, a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union (EU) for eribulin (Halaven; Eisai Limited). The decision was based on the favorable opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use recommending a marketing authorization for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have progressed after at least 2 chemotherapeutic regimens for advanced disease. Eribulin mesylate is a structurally simplified synthetic analogue of halichondrin B, which is a natural product isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria okadai (ATC code L01XX41). Eribulin is a nontaxane, microtubule dynamics inhibitor belonging to the halichondrin class of antineoplastic agents. Eribulin inhibits the growth phase of microtubules without affecting the shortening phase and sequesters tubulin into nonproductive aggregates leading to G(2)-M cell-cycle block, disruption of mitotic spindles, and, ultimately, apoptotic cell death after prolonged mitotic blockage. The recommended dose of eribulin is 1.23 mg/m(2) (equivalent to 1.4 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate) to be administered intravenously over 2 to 5 min on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. In the pivotal trial, eribulin was associated with increased overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who received at least 2 prior chemotherapy lines for advanced disease (median overall survival was 13.2 months in the eribulin arm vs. 10.6 months in the control arm; HR = 0.805; 95% confidence interval, 0.677-0.958; P = 0.014). The most common side effects are asthenia or fatigue and neutropenia. The objective of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary report and product information, including product characteristics, are available on the European Medicines Agency website.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Furanos , Cetonas , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Furanos/administração & dosagem , Furanos/efeitos adversos , Furanos/química , Furanos/farmacocinética , Órgãos dos Sistemas de Saúde , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Cetonas/administração & dosagem , Cetonas/efeitos adversos , Cetonas/química , Cetonas/farmacocinética , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Clin Cancer Res ; 17(21): 6608-14, 2011 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21976546

RESUMO

On June 14, 2010, the European Commission issued a conditional marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union for pazopanib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Pazopanib is an antineoplastic agent that inhibits multiple receptor tyrosine kinases. The recommended oral dose is 800 mg once daily. The benefit of pazopanib is an increased progression-free survival. In the pivotal trial VEG105192, the median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval, 7.4-12.9) in the pazopanib arm compared with 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.8-4.2) in the placebo arm. The most common side effects include diarrhea, hair color change, hypertension, nausea, fatigue, anorexia, vomiting, dysgeusia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, and abdominal pain. The objective of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application that led to approval in the European Union.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Indazóis , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 59(4): 212-9, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18844696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The CC-chemokine receptor-1 (CCR1) is thought to be involved in recruitment of inflammatory cells in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). CP-481715 is a specific antagonist of CCR1. OBJECTIVES: To determine the inhibitory effects of CP-418 715 in ACD by evaluating the clinical signs and cellular infiltration in skin biopsies following epicutaneous nickel challenge in allergic subjects. SUBJECTS/METHODS: In this phase 1/2 study, 40 subjects were randomized to 5 days of treatment in four parallel groups (placebo three times daily (TID), placebo once daily (QD), 1000 mg CP-418 715 TID, and 3000 mg CP-418 715 QD). Twenty-four hours after the first drug administration, nickel sulfate patches were applied on subjects' backs and removed 48 hours later. RESULTS: Pretreatment with 1000 mg CP-481715 TID resulted in significant reductions in visual scores of the nickel reactions (P = 0.01). Instrumentally measured erythema tended to decrease in the CP-481715 mg TID group (P = 0.06). No differences were noted between the 3000 mg CP-481715 mg QD group and pooled placebo. No significant differences were found for immunohistological cell counts. CP-418 715 was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Blocking of CCR1 only partly inhibited clinical manifestations of ACD. Several chemokine receptors are likely relevant for the cellular influx observed in ACD lesions.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/tratamento farmacológico , Quinoxalinas/uso terapêutico , Receptores CCR1/antagonistas & inibidores , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/patologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Irritantes/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Níquel/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...