Help-seeking timeline followback for problem drinkers: preliminary comparison with agency records of treatment contacts.

OBJECTIVE: A pilot study assessed the utility of the Timeline Followback (TLFB) method to collect information on help seeking. METHOD: Using the TLFB method, 34 clients (26 men) who had attended at least one session of an outpatient alcohol treatment program reported on treatment contacts, including any supplemental services (e.g., psychiatric care). TLFB reports of help seeking at that agency were compared with agency records of treatment contacts. RESULTS: Clients reported on their help-seeking behavior for a period of approximately 8 months after they had completed an initial assessment for the outpatient treatment. With regard to the number of outpatient sessions they attended, intraclass correlations and equivalence testing showed that the TLFB data were comparable to the agency records of treatment contacts. Analysis of week-to-week correspondence of the presence or absence of help-seeking episodes showed good agreement between TLFB and the agency records for most participants, although there was substantial variation. Degree of correspondence was not associated with the length of the recall period or individual differences (e.g., drinking pattern). Older participants, however, tended to have lower week-to-week concordance than did younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide preliminary support for the utility of a help-seeking TLFB instrument to assess addiction- and mental health-related contacts. This instrument may be especially useful in research in which collecting temporal patterns of help seeking is of interest (e.g., in studies examining factors influencing the delay in help seeking after relapse).

Problem drinkers: evaluation of a stepped-care approach.

The present study evaluated a stepped-care model for the treatment of problem drinkers; those not severely dependent on alcohol. The initial treatment consisted of a motivationally based, four-session outpatient treatment. Based on previous research, treatment nonresponders were defined as having consumed more than 12 drinks per week between the assessment and third session. Six-month follow-up interviews were conducted on three groups of problem drinkers: (1) those who responded to the initial intervention (n = 67); (2) those who did not respond to the initial treatment (n = 36); and (3) those who did not respond to the initial treatment and received a supplemental intervention (n = 33). The last two groups were used to evaluate whether providing treatment nonresponders with an additional "step" would improve treatment outcomes. The primary dependent measures were posttreatment percent days abstinent and posttreatment drinks per drinking day. Results suggested that (1) within treatment drinking can help identify treatment nonresponse in stepped-care models; (2) the supplemental intervention did not influence posttreatment drinking; (3) treatment responders and nonresponders sought additional help at the same rate. The present study is the first study on stepped-care for alcohol treatment and provides a methodology for evaluating stepped interventions. Recommendations for future research in this area include more attention to assessing the needs of treatment nonresponders and help seeking behavior of both responders and nonresponders after an initial intervention.