Prevalence and changing antimicrobial resistance profiles of Shigella spp. isolated from diarrheal patients in Kolkata during 2011-2019.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence, characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of various Shigella serogroups isolated from patients with acute diarrhea of the Infectious Diseases Hospital in Kolkata from 2011-2019. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: During the study period, Shigella isolates were tested for their serogroups, antibiotic resistance pattern and virulence gene profiles. A total of 5.8% of Shigella spp. were isolated, among which S. flexneri (76.1%) was the highest, followed by S. sonnei (18.7%), S. boydii (3.4%), and S. dysenteriae (1.8%). Antimicrobial resistance against nalidixic acid was higher in almost all the Shigella isolates, while the resistance to ß-lactamases, fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol diverged. The occurrence of multidrug resistance was found to be linked with various genes encoding drug-resistance, multiple mutations in the topoisomerase genes, and mobile genetic elements. All the isolates were positive for the invasion plasmid antigen H gene (ipaH). Dendrogram analysis of the plasmid and pulsed-field electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles revealed 70-80% clonal similarity among each Shigella serotype. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive long-term surveillance report highlights the clonal diversity of clinical Shigella strains circulating in Kolkata, India, and shows alarming resistance trends towards recommended antibiotics. The elucidation of this study's outcome is helpful not only in identifying emerging antimicrobial resistance patterns of Shigella spp. but also in developing treatment guidelines appropriate for this region.

Protective efficacy of fish oil nanoemulsion against non-typhoidal Salmonella mediated mucosal inflammation and loss of barrier function.

Non-typhoidal Salmonella serotypes are well adapted to utilize the inflammation for colonization in the mammalian gut mucosa and cause loss of the integrity of the epithelial barrier in the mammalian intestine. The present study assessed the protective efficacy of fish oil-in-water nanoemulsion, compared to the conventional emulsion, towards the intestinal epithelial barrier against invasive infection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain SL1344 in an in vivo streptomycin-treated mouse model. Non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain SL1344 expresses its invasiveness by creating extreme inflammatory assault in the mammalian host lumen via its repertoire of secretory or membrane-bound proteins. Prophylactic treatment of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid-rich fish oil nanoemulsion not only reduced the inflammatory markers by 4-5 fold against the established infection but also retained the gut barrier efficiency as shown by FITC-dextran permeability assay. Though the conventional emulsion also showed similar trends, the efficacy was significantly better with nanoemulsion treatment but neither the nanoemulsion nor conventional emulsion caused any significant change in the microbial colonization of the murine gut mucosa. Mechanistic assessment of the nanoemulsion against inflammation and invasion across the Caco-2 cell monolayer revealed that nanoemulsion treatment protected the expression of Zona occludens-1 along the tight junction, almost by 3-fold as compared to the infected cell monolayer. Such protection was evinced by the trans-epithelial electrical resistance value and the FITC-dextran permeability analysis as well. Fish oil nanoemulsion treatment has also shown significant reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokine expression by the Salmonella strain SL1344 infected Caco-2 cell monolayer. Conventional emulsion also showed distinct protection, but the nanoemulsion offered better protection at the same dosage of fish oil, probably due to its better bioavailability. The results proved that fish oil-loaded nanoemulsion can be efficacious towards maintaining the barrier function and protecting against systemic bacteremia during invasive intestinal infection.

Laboratory evaluation of the rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 using diarrheal samples.

BACKGROUND: Cholera, an acute diarrheal disease is a major public health problem in many developing countries. Several rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are available for the detection of cholera, but their efficacies are not compared in an endemic setting. In this study, we have compared the specificity and sensitivity of three RDT kits for the detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 and compared their efficiency with culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. METHODS: Five hundred six diarrheal stool samples collected from patients from two different hospitals in Kolkata, India were tested using SD Bioline Cholera, SMART-II Cholera O1 and Crystal-VC RDT kits. All the stool samples were screened for the presence of V. cholerae by direct and enrichment culture methods. Stool DNA-based PCR assay was made to target the cholera toxin (ctxAB) and O1 somatic antigen (rfb) encoding genes. Statistical evaluation of the RDTs has been made using STATA software with stool culture and PCR results as the gold standards. The Bayesian latent class model (LCM) was used to evaluate the diagnostic tests in the absence of the gold standard. RESULTS: Involving culture technique as gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the cholera RDT kits in the direct testing of stools was highest with SAMRT-II (86.1%) and SD-Cholera (94.4%), respectively. The DNA based PCR assays gave very high sensitivity (98.4%) but the specificity was comparatively low (75.3%). After enrichment, the high sensitivity and specificity was detected with SAMRT-II (78.8%) and SD-Cholera (99.1%), respectively. Considering PCR as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the RDTs remained between 52.3-58.2% and 92.3-96.8%, respectively. In the LCM, the sensitivity of direct and enrichment testing was high in SAMRT-II (88% and 92%, respectively), but the specificity was high in SD cholera for both the methods (97% and 100%, respectively). The sensitivity/specificity of RDTs and direct culture have also been analyzed considering the age, gender and diarrheal disease severity of the patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, the performance of the RDT kits remained almost similar in terms of specificity and sensitivity. Performance of PCR was superior to the antibody-based RDTs. The RTDs are very useful in identifying cholera cases during outbreak/epidemic situations and for making them as a point-of-care (POC) testing tool needs more improvement.