Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(12): 2484-2491, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37595768

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) cutoffs have been established for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients due to increased risk of medical complications in obese patients. However, evidence-based medical optimization may mitigate risk in these patients. This study examined the influence of BMI on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following primary TKA with specialized perioperative optimization. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2020, 1,329 consecutive primary TKAs using standardized perioperative optimization were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into ordinal groups based on BMI in 5 kg/m2 increments (range, 17 to 61). Primary outcomes related to activity level, pain, function, and satisfaction were evaluated. BMI groups ≥35 had significantly lower age, more women, and higher prevalence of comorbidities (P ≤ .004). Mean follow-up was 1.7 years (range, 1 to 5 years). RESULTS: Each successive BMI group from 35 to ≥50 demonstrated continually greater improvement in pain with level walking and stair climbing (P ≤ .001), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P = .001), and greater satisfaction (P = .007). No patients who had a BMI ≥35 were revised for aseptic loosening, and rates of periprosthetic joint infection were not different between BMI groups (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Despite being more debilitated preoperatively, patients who had a BMI ≥35 experienced greater improvements in PROMs compared to patients who had lower BMI. Given the significant improvements in PROMs and quality of life in obese patients, with appropriate perioperative optimization, these patients should not be prohibited from having a TKA when appropriately indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Humanos , Feminino , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/cirurgia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Dor/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
MicroPubl Biol ; 20212021 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33474526

RESUMO

Genetic screens have been used to identify genes involved in the regulation of different biological processes. We identified growth mutants in a Flp/FRT screen using the Drosophila melanogaster eye to identify conditional regulators of cell growth and cell division. One mutant identified from this screen, B.2.16, was mapped and characterized by researchers in undergraduate genetics labs as part of the Fly-CURE. We find that B.2.16 is a non-lethal genetic modifier of the Dark82 mosaic eye phenotype.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...