Passing from open to robotic surgery for dismembered pyeloplasty: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of symptomatic uretropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) has evolved towards minimal invasive endourologic and laparoscopic techniques. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty has achieved outcomes comparable to those corresponding to open and laparoscopic techniques. The objective of this work is to demonstrate that the transition between open to robotic surgeries is straightforward. We analysed retrospectively "our initial results" in robotic assisted UPJ reconstruction procedures. Technical and convalescence aspects for 17 reconstructive robotic procedures performed by 2 surgeons in a 5 years period have been evaluated. Success consisted of no postoperative symptoms, no evidence of obstruction on mercaptoacetyltriglycine-3 diuretic renal scan or computed tomography (CT) and non-further treatment. STATISTICS: mean ± standard deviation, median and range. FINDINGS: From 17 patients who underwent Da Vinci Robot procedure, 15 followed the complete treatment (2 were converted to laparotomy). Two patients had post-operative urine leakage; the stent was changed under sedation without further sequelae. The mean operative time was 189 minutes. The average hospital stay was 4 days. The average follow-up was 25 months. There was only one patient with UPJ stenosis at 6 months and he was treated by balloon dilation. All patients were followed with MAG 3 lasix renal scan, CT or urography. Except the patient with recurrent stenosis, all patients were asymptomatic without objective evidence of obstruction at the present time. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic pyeloplasty technique is feasible and gives good results without previous laparoscopic experience.

Evaluation of efficacy of four laparoscopic needle drivers.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the impact of needle driver design on laparoscopic suturing skills by experts and novices. METHODS: Three experienced laparoscopic surgeons and 3 novice junior residents were asked to perform a fixed set of suturing tasks in a laparoscopic pelvic-trainer. The laparoscopic needle drivers compared were (1) the Ethicon driver (E 705R), (2) Karl Storz (KS) pistol grip (26173 KC), (3) KS finger grip (26167 SK), and (4) KS palm grip (26173 ML). Times were recorded for each operator to grasp and position a needle for suturing in a particular angle, as well as to throw a horizontal and a vertical stitch and tie a single square knot using 2-0 Vicryl suture with a taper CT-1 needle. Subsequently, participants were asked to complete a subjective questionnaire rating the drivers. RESULTS: The average suturing time provided the most discriminatory power in comparing the needle drivers. For experienced operators, the KS pistol grip allowed faster suturing times than did the KS finger grip and the KS palm grip but not the Ethicon driver. For novice users, the Ethicon driver allowed faster suturing times than did the KS finger grip but not the KS pistol grip or the KS palm grip. In the subjective questionnaire, the KS pistol grip received the highest scores, and the KS finger grip received the lowest scores. CONCLUSION: Novice laparoscopists performed best with the KS pistol grip as well as the Ethicon laparoscopic needle drivers while experienced laparoscopists performed best with the pistol grip KS needle driver.

Irrigation and drainage properties of three-way urethral catheters.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in an in vitro study the irrigation and drainage capabilities of a variety of available catheters. Three-way Foley catheters are used when irrigation of the bladder is anticipated to prevent or manage blood clots in the bladder. METHODS: Six operators applied maximal one-handed pressure irrigation with a catheter-tip syringe through the irrigation and drainage ports of the Bardex and Dover three-way catheters (16F to 26F). Maximal manual irrigation flow was recorded using a flowmeter. Continuous gravity irrigation and drainage flows were measured by suspending a 2-L irrigation bag 80 cm above the catheters and fastening an artificial bladder to the drainage tip of each Foley catheter with the catheter balloon inflated to 30 mL. RESULTS: The Bardex 22F and 24F catheters had superior manual irrigation using the irrigation port (maximal urinary flow rate 8.9 +/- 1.3 mL/s and 9.5 +/- 1.5 mL/s, respectively, P < 0.000001) compared with the Dover 22F and 24F catheters. The Bardex and Dover 22F catheters (maximal urinary flow rate 29.0 +/- 1.9 mL/s and 29.3 +/- 1.9 mL/s, respectively, P = 0.66) and 24F catheters (maximal urinary flow rate 30.5 +/- 2.0 mL/s and 30.6 +/- 1.2 mL/s, respectively, P = 0.83) performed equally in manual irrigation using the drainage port. The Bardex 22F (average flow rate 1.6 +/- 0.1 mL/s, P < 0.00001) and 24F (average flow rate 1.7 +/- 0.0 mL/s, P < 0.000001) catheters exhibited better continuous irrigation and flow than the Dover 22F and 24F catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Three-way catheters are placed in situations in which efficient bladder irrigation is essential for patient safety. The Bardex 22F to 26F catheters optimized continuous bladder irrigation of the catheters tested.

Novel device to assist urethrovesical anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

We evaluated a novel urethral sound (Benique sound-Karl Storz) to assist suturing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. This sound provides for a more secure grip compared with the traditional sound, thereby affording controlled traction of the gland during the procedure and smooth coordinated movements of the sound during the anastomosis.

Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral model.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the rapidity of stone capture and removal by six tipless and four helical baskets in a ureteral model. Expeditious ureteral stone extraction is reliant on the basket size, configuration, and radial dilation force. METHODS: A 5-mm feline calculus was placed in a simulated model of the human ureter at a distance of 7.5 cm from the orifice, and saline irrigant instilled. A 6/7.5F Wolf semirigid ureteroscope was used for access and visualization of the stone. Operators were randomized to start stone extraction with 1 of 10 stone baskets, and three extraction attempts were conducted with each device. Six experienced operators tested each device. The tipless baskets tested were the ACMI Sur-Catch NT 3.0F, Bard Dimension 3.0F, Boston Scientific Zerotip 3.0F, Cook N-Circle 3.0F, Cook Delta 2.4F, and Sacred Heart Halo 1.9F. The helical baskets tested were the Cook N-Force 3.2F, Microvasive Gemini 3.0F, ACMI Sur-Catch Helical 3.0F, and Sacred Heart Hercules 3.0F. The time to extraction in seconds was recorded. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the tipless (14 +/- 7 seconds) or helical (12.8 +/- 6.6 seconds, P = 0.21) basket groups. All baskets were able to retrieve the ureteral stones successfully. The most efficient basket was the Cook N-Circle with an average time of 8.7 seconds to stone extraction compared with the least efficient basket, the ACMI Sur-Catch NT, at 15.8 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: The Cook N-Circle basket provided the most expeditious means to stone extraction in a ureteral model.

Percutaneous renal stone extraction: in vitro study of retrieval devices.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, percutaneous stone extraction has relied on the use of 2-prong and 3-prong graspers, which are prone to causing trauma to the urothelium. We evaluate the efficiency of stone removal with a novel tipless stone basket designed specifically for percutaneous procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3, 5 and 8 mm human calculus were placed in the calix of a percutaneous renal model. A 26Fr Storz nephroscope (27093B, Storz Medical AG, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland) was inserted through a 30Fr Amplatz sheath into the model with camera input from a Storz telecam SL-NTSC feeding to a 20-inch Sony Triniton monitor (Sony Corp of America, New York, New York). Operators were randomized to start stone extraction with a Storz 3-prong grasper (27090RB) or a Cook 12Fr Perc-NCircle (38 cm) (Cook Urological, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana). Subsequent testing alternated between the 2 devices until 10 extraction attempts were conducted with each device. Time to extraction of all 3 calculi and number of inadvertent withdrawals of the sheath were recorded. Three experienced operators tested each device. RESULTS: Stone extraction times were shorter with the Cook Perc-NCircle than the 3-prong grasper for all operators. Mean time for stone extraction was 25.3 +/- 11.2 seconds for the Perc-NCircle compared to 35.1 +/- 18.5 seconds for the 3-prong grasper (p = 0.016). Loss of access by inadvertent removal of the Amplatz sheath occurred in 53% of the attempts with the 3-prong grasper compared to 7% of attempts with the Perc-NCircle. CONCLUSIONS: The Cook Perc-NCircle facilitates a more expeditious approach to percutaneous stone removal with less risk of sheath withdrawal.