[Prescription of acetaminophen in five French hospitals: What are the practices?] / Prescription du paracétamol dans cinq centres hospitaliers français : quelles sont les pratiques ?

AIM: Acetaminophen is widely used in hospital settings and often considered as nontoxic. We conducted a multicentric study in order to evaluate its proper use. METHOD: Prescriptions from five general hospitals were analyzed, according to dose adjustments required in renal or liver failure, weight or chronic alcoholism, determined using a literature review. Other criteria have been assessed: indication for parenteral access, accuracy of administration time and pain assessment. RESULTS: Among the 1256 analyzed prescriptions, 21% are non-compliants. The main causes of non-compliance (NC) are adjustments to weight and renal failure. Higher NC rates concern chronic alcoholism and liver failure. CONCLUSION: Misuse of acetaminophen seems related to a lack of official recommendations concerning dose adjustments. Hospital pharmacists have an important role to play in the promotion of proper use of acetaminophen. Therefore we established a prescribing aid.

[Targeting high-risk drugs to optimize clinical pharmacists' intervention]. / Cibler les médicaments à risque pour optimiser la validation pharmaceutique des prescriptions.

OBJECTIVES: By the Order of 6 April 2011, the pharmacist must validate all the prescriptions containing "high-risk drugs" or those of "patients at risk". To optimize this clinical pharmacy activity, we identified high-risk drugs. METHOD: A list of high-risk drugs has been established using literature, pharmacists' interventions (PI) performed in our hospital and a survey sent to hospital pharmacists. In a prospective study (analysis of 100 prescriptions for each high-risk drug selected), we have identified the most relevant to target. RESULTS: We obtained a statistically significant PI rate (P<0.05) for digoxin, oral anticoagulants direct, oral methotrexate and colchicine. CONCLUSION: This method of targeted pharmaceutical validation based on high-risk drugs is relevant to detect patients with high risk of medicine-related illness.

Posaconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: limits in clinical practice.

Posaconazole (PSZ) is being used for prophylaxis in hematological patients who are at high risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD), but absorption limitations have been reported. Our objective was to assess both the feasibility and the efficacy of PSZ prophylaxis in clinical practice. From March 2010 to September 2010, all patients admitted to our unit for chemotherapy for acute leukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation received optimized PSZ prophylaxis 200 mg four times daily with cola soda. PSZ trough concentrations (Cmin) were monitored at days 5, 7, 14, and 21. The incidence of IFDs was determined and compared to that of a historical control group. Thirty-five consecutive patients were prospectively included. PSZ prophylaxis was interrupted for 29% of them at day 14 and 51% of them at day 21. The main limitations were impracticality of oral feeding (29%) and occurrence of suspected IFDs (23%). PSZ median Cmin were 0.47, 0.40, 0.24, 0.36 µg/mL at days 5, 7, 14, and 21, respectively. Eighty percent of patient results were lower than the target Cmin of 0.5 µg/ml on day 14, the higher-risk period associated with neutropenia. Four probable breakthrough IFDs (11%) were diagnosed in 2010; no clear association between PSZ Cmin and occurrence of infection was observed. The incidence of IFDs was unchanged (historical control group: 9.7%; P = 0.72). Implementation of systematic PSZ prophylaxis did not significantly decrease the incidence of IFDs at our center. PSZ interruptions related to mucositis and too low Cmin were the main limitations to its use.