Comparison of Hyaluronidase-Mediated Degradation Kinetics of Commercially Available Hyaluronic Acid Fillers In Vitro.

BACKGROUND: The ability to degrade hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers with hyaluronidase allows for better management of adverse effects and reversal of suboptimal treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the enzymatic degradation kinetics of 16 commercially available HA-based fillers, representing 6 manufacturing technologies. METHODS: In this nonclinical study, a recently developed in vitro multidose hyaluronidase administration protocol was used to induce degradation of HA-based fillers, enabling real-time evaluation of viscoelastic properties under near-static conditions. Each filler was exposed to repeated doses of hyaluronidase at intervals of 5 minutes to reach the degradation threshold of G' ≤ 30 Pa. RESULTS: Noticeable differences in degradation characteristics were observed based on the design and technology of different filler classes. Vycross fillers were the most difficult to degrade and the Cohesive Polydensified Matrix filler was the least difficult to degrade. Preserved Network Technology products demonstrated proportional increases in gel degradation time and enzyme volume required for degradation across the individual resilient hyaluronic acid (RHA) products and indication categories. No obvious relationship was observed between gel degradation characteristics and the individual parameters of HA concentration, HA chain length, or the degree of modification of each filler when analyzed separately; however, a general correlation was identified with certain physicochemical properties. CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturing technology was the most important factor influencing the reversibility of an HA product. An understanding of the differential degradation profiles of commercially available fillers will allow clinicians to select products that offer a higher margin of safety due to their preferential reversibility.

Strengthening the Key Features of Volumizing Fillers: Projection Capacity and Long-Term Persistence.

Volumizing fillers aim to create or restore facial volume in fat layers. To provide strong tissue lifting and long-term persistence, gels are generally designed with stiff properties, characterized by a high storage modulus (G'). However, clinical evidence shows a discrepancy between high G' and good lifting capacities, especially after skin tension has been exerted on the gel. To better explore the in vivo behavior of a gel, we first evaluated the elastic moduli of five commercial volumizers (RHA4, JUVVOL, RESVOL, RESLYFT, and BELVOL) in dynamic compression mode, E'. We further developed a Projection Index score based on the rheological assessment of creep in compression to mimic skin tension-induced stress relaxation (flattening). Finally, the ability of a gel to resist enzymatic degradation was analyzed with a multidose approach. Despite similar clinical indications, volumizers exhibited distinct behaviors. RHA4 and BELVOL showed the highest E' values (resistance to strain), RHA4, JUVVOL, and RESVOL exhibited the greatest projection capacities, while JUVVOL and RHA4 offered the largest persistence to enzymatic degradation. In this article, we introduce the use of the Projection Index to efficiently assess the ability of a gel to lift tissues, thus increasing preclinical models' efficiency and reducing the need for animal studies.

Development of an ex vivo porcine skin model for the preclinical evaluation of subcutaneously injected biomacromolecules.

Subcutaneous administration is used to deliver systemically-acting biotherapeutics, e.g. antibodies, and locally-acting biomacromolecules, e.g. hyaluronic acid. However, few preclinical models are available to evaluate post-injection behaviour in the tissue microenvironment. In vivo animal studies are costly, time-consuming, and raise obvious ethical concerns. In vitro models are cost-efficient, high-throughput solutions, but cannot simulate complex skin structure and biological function. An ex vivo model (containing hypodermis) with an extended culture period that enabled longitudinal studies would be of great interest for both the pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical industries. We describe the development of one such ex vivo model, using viable full-thickness porcine skin. Structural integrity was evaluated using a histological scoring system: spongiosis and epidermal detachment were identified as discriminating parameters. Ki67 and Claudin-1 expression reported on epidermal cell proliferation and barrier function, respectively and their expression decreased as a function of incubation time. After optimization, the system was used to investigate the fate/impact of subcutaneously administered hyaluronic acid (HA) formulations. The results showed that HA was localized at the injection site and adjacent adipocytes were well preserved during 5 days' incubation and confirmed that the full-thickness ex vivo porcine skin model could provide a platform for preclinical evaluation of subcutaneously injected biomacromolecules.

Multidose Hyaluronidase Administration as an Optimal Procedure to Degrade Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Soft Tissue Fillers.

Minimally invasive hyaluronan (HA) tissue fillers are routinely employed to provide tissue projection and correct age-related skin depressions. HA fillers can advantageously be degraded by hyaluronidase (HAase) administration in case of adverse events. However, clear guidelines regarding the optimal dosage and mode of administration of HAase are missing, leaving a scientific gap for practitioners in their daily practice. In this study, we implemented a novel rheological procedure to rationally evaluate soft tissue filler degradability and optimize their degradation kinetics. TEOSYAL RHA® filler degradation kinetics in contact with HAase was monitored in real-time by rheological time sweeps. Gels were shown to degrade as a function of enzymatic activity, HA concentration, and BDDE content, with a concomitant loss of their viscoelastic properties. We further demonstrated that repeated administration of small HAase doses improved HA degradation kinetics over large single doses. Mathematical analyses were developed to evaluate the degradation potential of an enzyme. Finally, we tuned the optimal time between injections and number of enzymatic units, maximizing degradation kinetics. In this study, we have established a scientific rationale for the degradation of HA fillers by multidose HAase administration that could serve as a basis for future clinical management of adverse events.

Comparative Preclinical Study of Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid-based filler injections are now well-established aesthetic procedures for the correction of skin tissue defects and volume loss. Filler injections are becoming increasingly popular, with a growing number of injections performed each year. Although classified as a minimally invasive procedure, the introduction of a needle or a canula may remain painful for the patient. A major improvement was achieved with the incorporation of local anesthetics into the formulation for pain relief. METHODS: In this study, two well-known anesthetics, lidocaine and mepivacaine, were systematically compared to assess their influence on filler mechanical and biological features. The impact of each anesthetic was monitored in terms of gel rheological properties, stability, durability, and degradation. The release profiles of each anesthetic were also recorded. Finally, the pharmacokinetics of each anesthetic in rats were assessed. RESULTS: For all the rheological and biological experiments performed, lidocaine and mepivacaine influences were comparable. The addition of either anesthetic into a soft-tissue filler showed no significant modifications of the stability, durability, and degradability of the gel, with similar release profiles and pharmacokinetics at an equivalent concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Substituting lidocaine with mepivacaine does not impact the properties of the gels, and thus both can be equally incorporated as anesthetics in soft-tissue fillers.

Crosslinking hyaluronic acid soft-tissue fillers: current status and perspectives from an industrial point of view.

INTRODUCTION: Hyaluronan (HA)-based soft-tissue fillers are injectable crosslinked hydrogels aimed to counteract facial skin aging signs via minimally invasive procedures. The crosslinking step is required to drastically improve HA residence time in vivo and provide the gel with specific viscoelastic properties matching the clinical indications. While HA as a raw material and HA fillers are widely studied, little is reported about crosslinkers themselves used in commercial fillers. AREAS COVERED: This article introduces the specifications of the ideal crosslinker in HA fillers. The properties of commercially used crosslinkers are reviewed. An up-to-date review of innovative hydrogel fabrication alternatives is conducted, and advantages and drawbacks are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: HA fillers are predominantly manufactured using 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) which is considered as the gold standard crosslinker worldwide due to its proven and unrivaled clinical track record of more than 20 years. Extensive studies have been published covering BDDE-crosslinked HA fillers' chemistry, gel properties, and clinical effectiveness and safety. However, new hydrogel fabrication strategies have emerged, paving the way for innovative alternatives potentially bringing novel features to HA fillers. Nevertheless, major efforts must still be implemented to assess their safety, efficacy, stability and suitability for industrialization.

Advanced Concepts in Rheology for the Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Soft Tissue Fillers.

BACKGROUND: Crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HA)-based soft tissue fillers possess unique viscoelastic properties intended to match specific product indications. Manufacturing has an impact on HA chain integrity and on filler properties. OBJECTIVE: This study introduces 2 new rheological parameters to evaluate the macroscopic characteristics of fillers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A library of reference commercialized HA fillers was selected to cover the full spectrum of product indications. Gels were assessed in terms of size of released HA fragments as a readout of gel integrity, degree of modification, cohesivity, and rheological properties. RESULTS: The elastic modulus G' often used to characterize fillers was shown not to follow macroscopic mechanical properties. To improve the mechanical characterization of fillers, Strength and Stretch scores were developed and tested. The Strength score defined the ability of a filler to sustain constant viscoelasticity over a wide range of constraints and represented the filler mechanical resilience. The Stretch score measured the propensity of a filler to deform in view to improve implant adaptation to facial animation for natural-looking results. CONCLUSION: Strength and Stretch scores sorted rheological parameters to macroscopic cohesivity assays more accurately than G' and may thus help predict the gel behavior once implanted and submitted to facial dynamics.