RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare vestibular outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) surgery, between robotic-assisted insertion of the electrodes versus manual insertion. METHODS: We performed a monocentric retrospective study. From March 2021, the robotic system RobOtol© was used for all CI cases. We compared this robotic-assisted insertion group with a manual insertion group of patients who received a CI between July 2020 and March 2021. Primary objective was vestibular outcome. We used objective vestibular function tests: caloric testing, Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP), and Video Head Impulse Test (VHIT). Secondary objectives were postoperative complications including patient-reported postoperative vertigo. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of caloric testing, VEMP or VHIT outcomes. In patient-reported outcomes, there was significantly more vertigo in the manual insertion group compared with robotic-assisted insertion. CONCLUSION: It is hypothesized that a non-traumatic insertion would cause less vestibular dysfunction postoperatively. Larger prospective studies are required to determine whether robotic-assisted CI insertion has a significant impact on vestibular outcomes in CI surgery.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate objective vestibular function after endolymphatic sac surgery (ELSS) for Menière's disease (MD), using comparative vestibular function tests: videonystagmography (VNG), vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) and video head-impulse test (VHIT) METHODS: Patients with definite MD using the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) of 1995 criteria modified in 2015 and treated with ELSS (sac decompression or sac opening) were included. The primary outcome was the preservation of vestibular function, comparing pre- and postoperative vestibular function tests: VNG, VEMP, VHIT. Secondary outcomes were control of episodes of vertigo, hearing outcome using AAO-HNS criteria, and QoL using the Menière's disease outcome questionnaire. RESULTS: 73 patients were included in the study. We found a significant preservation of vestibular function as measured by VNG and VHIT. There was no statistical difference in the presence or absence of cervical and ocular (P13/N23 and N1/P1) waves on VEMP pre- and postoperatively. 67% of patients had good control of episodes of vertigo post-operatively, with significantly better results in the sac opening group (75%). There was no significant change in hearing postoperatively, and QoL scores were significantly improved after surgery (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Endolymphatic sac surgery (ELSS) is a conservative surgical treatment, which does not negatively impact vestibular function. It was associated with improved control of episodes of vertigo, preservation of hearing, and a clear improvement in QoL scores. Despite its pathophysiology not being fully understood, it remains a first-line procedure preserving vestibular function, for MD refractory to medical management.
