Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J MS Care ; 15(2): 90-7, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24453768

RESUMO

This study explored changes in quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial variables in a large cohort of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). A total of 1287 Australians with MS were administered self-report questionnaires at baseline and 24 months later to examine the impact of disease severity and duration, perceived stress, self-efficacy, depression, and social support on QOL and self-care. Over the 2-year survey period, MS remained stable for 70% of respondents. Disease severity correlated with social support at baseline but not at 24 months, when the only significant correlation with disease severity was that of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 instrument (WHOQOL-100) domain of Level of Independence. Although QOL improved across the WHOQOL-100 domains Physical, Psychological, Level of Independence, Social Relationships, and Environment, decreases were found in the WHOQOL-100 facet overall QOL and well-being as well as self-efficacy over the same time period. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to assess the utility of four control measures. MS disease severity and MS disease duration were entered at Step 1, explaining 16.1% of the variance in QOL. After entry of perceived stress, self-efficacy, social support, and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) at Step 2, the total variance explained by the model as a whole was 55.8% (F6,1028 = 216.495, P < .001). Thus, even in the presence of stable disease and improvement in some WHOQOL-100 domains, overall QOL and self-efficacy had decreased at 2 years after the collection of baseline data. Loss of self-efficacy, increased stress, and depression are key factors in reduced QOL in people with MS.

2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 49(5): 472-7, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19780728

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because of differences in reporting criteria throughout the world, comparing perinatal mortality rates and identifying areas of concern can be complicated and imprecise. AIMS: To detail the systematic approach to reporting perinatal deaths and to identify any significant differences in outcomes in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). METHODS: Review of perinatal deaths from 2001 to 2005 in the ACT using the Australian and New Zealand Antecedent Classification of Perinatal Mortality (ANZACPM) and the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Death Classification (ANZNDC) systems. RESULTS: ACT residents' perinatal mortality rate was 10.6 per 1000 total births, fetal death rate 7.5 per 1000 total births and neonatal death rate 3.2 per 1000 live births. The three leading antecedent causes of perinatal death were congenital anomalies, spontaneous preterm birth and unexplained antepartum death. The three leading causes of neonatal death were extreme prematurity, cardiorespiratory disorders and congenital anomalies. Multiple births attributed to 20% (65 of 321) of perinatal deaths. Perinatal autopsy was performed in 50% of cases, but in only 64% of unexplained antepartum deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Causes of perinatal death for the ACT and surrounding New South Wales region are similar to other states using this classification system. The following are considered important lessons to promote accurate perinatal mortality reporting: (i) a universal reporting system for Australia utilising a multidisciplinary team; (ii) a high perinatal autopsy rate, especially in the critical area of antepartum death with no identifiable cause; and (iii) standardised definitions for avoidability. Attention to these areas may prompt further research and changes in practice to further reduce perinatal mortality.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Mortalidade Perinatal , Feminino , Humanos , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Vocabulário Controlado
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...