Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Distinguish Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis From Other Causes of Progressive Temporomandibular Joint Destruction?

PURPOSE: Similarities in initial presentations of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement from juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), idiopathic condylar resorption, and other forms of progressive TMJ destruction in children create diagnostic confusion. Treatment pathways, however, depend on determination of etiology. The purpose of this study was to compare TMJ magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of patients with joint degeneration localized to the TMJs to those with JIA and TMJ involvement. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including subjects younger than 18 years that presented from February 2008 to October 2019 with clinical TMJ degeneration, a gadolinium-enhanced TMJ MRI and a negative pediatric rheumatologic workup (non-JIA group), and a series of age and sex-matched subjects with TMJ degeneration on gadolinium-enhanced MRI and JIA (JIA group). MRIs were evaluated in a blinded fashion by 1 pediatric radiologist. The primary outcome variable was the radiologist's accuracy in predicting study grouping, assessed in 1 randomly-selected joint per patient. Secondary outcome variables included MRI characteristics of inflammation, osseous damage and articular disc morphology. Independent samples t-tests, sensitivity/specificity, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests were computed as applicable, and P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The sample included 34 subjects: 16 non-JIA (75% female, age 13.9 ± 2.8 years) and 18 JIA (77% female, age 13.6 ± 2.8 years) (P ≥ .738). The radiologist correctly classified 64.7% of subjects as non-JIA or JIA (P = .078, sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 31.3%). Inflammatory and osseous findings were similar between groups (P ≥ .073). The disc was anteriorly displaced in 9 non-JIA and 0 JIA joints (P < .001, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%) and flattened in 3 non-JIA and 14 JIA joints (P = .006, sensitivity = 38.9%, specificity = 90.6%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Inflammatory and osseous findings on gadolinium-enhanced TMJ MRIs are insufficient to determine the etiology of progressive TMJ destruction. Disc characteristics, however, significantly differ between JIA and non-JIA etiologies and may be important in differentiating these conditions.

How Much Opioid Medication Do Patients Need After Orthognathic Surgery?

PURPOSE: Opioid misuse is a public health crisis. It is incumbent upon surgeons to understand analgesic requirements for operations they perform to inform responsible prescribing practices. The purpose of this study was to quantify opioid use following orthognathic surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including consecutive patients that had orthognathic surgery at the Boston Children's Hospital from May 2020 to September 2021. To be included, subjects had to have had a Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomies, or both. Subjects were excluded if they had a craniofacial syndrome (not including cleft lip and palate) or did not complete the study. Postoperative prescriptions and instructions were standardized. The primary outcome variable was total postoperative opioid use (inpatient + outpatient). Inpatient opioid delivery was recorded from the electronic medical record. Outpatient opioid use was ascertained via electronic questionnaire each day for 7 postoperative days. Descriptive and analytic statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects (54% male, age 18.7 ± 2.7 years) were included. Thirty-two subjects (91%) used postoperative opioid analgesia as inpatients, outpatient, or both, with mean total use of 18.2 ± 20.9 morphine milligram equivalents/subject (equivalent to 7.3 ± 8.4 oral oxycodone 5-mg doses). Nine (26%) subjects received inpatient opioid but did not use any oral opioid after discharge. As outpatients, a mean of 3.9 ± 5.5 oral oxycodone 5-mg dose was used per patient over 2.1 ± 2.1 postoperative days. Le Fort I osteotomy-only procedures had significantly lower (P = .032) and combined Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy operations had significantly higher (P = .003) opioid requirements than the mean. Length of procedure and hospital length of stay were significant predictors of analgesic need, with an increase of 0.34 oxycodone doses/subject for each 10-minute increase in procedure time and 0.20 oxycodone doses/subject for each 1-hour increase in length of stay. Pain level on the first postoperative day was also a predictor of total opioid use (P < .050). CONCLUSION: Opioid use after orthognathic surgery is less than expected. Caution is necessary to avoid overprescribing.