Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AANA J ; 88(5): 365-371, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990205

RESUMO

Production pressure and/or normalization of deviance contribute to poor patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between production pressure and normalization of deviance to poor patient outcomes. A team of experienced qualitative researchers conducted a metasynthesis of all qualitative closed claims studies that used the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) Foundation Closed Claims database and were accepted for publication at the time of the study. Three central concepts emerged from the analysis: (1) impaired culture of safety, (2) violations of standards of care, and (3) impaired patient safety and outcomes. It is imperative that anesthesia providers support a culture of safety and follow AANA Standards for Nurse Anesthesia Practice.


Assuntos
Anestesia/enfermagem , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermeiros Anestesistas/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Estados Unidos
2.
AANA J ; 87(6): 468-476, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31920200

RESUMO

Medical errors are among the top 3 causes of patient deaths in the United States, with up to 400,000 preventable deaths occurring in hospitalized patients each year. Although improvements have been made in anesthesia patient safety, adverse outcomes continue to occur. This study used thematic analysis to examine anesthesia closed claims that were associated with preventable morbidity and mortality. Investigators determined that 123 closed malpractice claims files from the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) Foundation closed claims database involved events that the involved Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist could have prevented. Factors that were associated with preventable closed claims included communication failures, violations of the AANA Standards for Nurse Anesthesia Practice, and errors in judgment.


Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesiologia , Gerenciamento de Dados/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
3.
AANA J ; 86(5): 401-407, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31584410

RESUMO

Transfer of care is defined as the exchange of information and professional accountability for patient care between individuals. This article describes a qualitative content analysis (N = 19) using a closed-claims database generated by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) Foundation. The purpose of this study was to explore perioperative transfer-of-care events that contributed to professional malpractice claims to identify general themes, antecedents, and consequences to improve clinical practices and guide future research. A brief summary of the 6 themes that emerged in this study is as follows. (1) Patients should be transferred to an appropriate level of care based on their needs. (2) Production pressure leads to normalization of deviance. (3) Clinicians need to conduct their own patient assessments and health record reviews without relying solely on another clinician's report. (4) Interdisciplinary team communication failure is a leading cause of adverse outcomes. (5) Inadequate patient monitoring and physical assessment after the transfer of care is completed is a leading cause of adverse outcomes. (6) Transfer of care should not occur during high-risk patient care events or during periods of patient hemodynamic or respiratory instability.


Assuntos
Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermeiros Anestesistas , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Período Perioperatório , Estados Unidos
4.
Comput Inform Nurs ; 34(9): 406-12, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27315364

RESUMO

Clinical documentation is a critical tool in supporting care provided to patients. Sound documentation provides a picture of clinical events that can be used to improve patient care. However, many other uses for clinical documentation are equally important. Such documentation informs clinical decision support tools, creates a legal record of patient care, assists in financial reimbursement of services, and serves as a repository for secondary data analysis. Conversely, poor documentation can impair patient safety and increase malpractice risk exposure by reflecting poor or inaccurate information that ultimately may guide patient care decisions.Through an examination of anesthesia-related closed claims, a descriptive qualitative study emerged, which explored the antecedents and consequences of documentation quality in the claims reviewed. A secondary data analysis utilized a database generated by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Foundation closed claim review team. Four major themes emerged from the analysis. Themes 1, 2, and 4 primarily describe how poor documentation quality can have negative consequences for clinicians. The third theme primarily describes how poor documentation quality that can negatively affect patient safety.


Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Documentação/normas , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/legislação & jurisprudência , Anestesia/enfermagem , Humanos , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil , Responsabilidade Legal , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Enfermeiros Anestesistas , Segurança do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gestão de Riscos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...