Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 33(3): NP14-NP17, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35234069

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the long-term follow-up of bilateral ectasia after laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with known risk factors. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 23-year-old woman. Preoperative refraction was - 7.25 -2.00 × 20 in the right eye and -7.25 -1.50 × 155 in the left eye. Maximal keratometry was 47.32 diopters and 48.37 diopters, respectively, which was a contraindication to Laser Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) and a SMILE was proposed in 2015. One year after surgery, ectasia developed in the left eye and crosslinking (CXL) was performed. Two years after surgery, ectasia also developed in the right eye and CXL was also performed, leading to stabilization in both eyes five years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Known contraindications for LASIK are also contraindications for the performance of refractive surgery with SMILE. CXL is an efficient treatment of post-SMILE corneal ectasia.


Assuntos
Ceratomileuse Assistida por Excimer Laser In Situ , Miopia , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Acuidade Visual , Seguimentos , Dilatação Patológica/etiologia , Dilatação Patológica/cirurgia , Miopia/cirurgia , Miopia/complicações , Refração Ocular , Ceratomileuse Assistida por Excimer Laser In Situ/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Excimer/uso terapêutico , Substância Própria/cirurgia , Topografia da Córnea
2.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 45(11): 1535-1538, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31587939

RESUMO

Phacoemulsification can be challenging in patients who are unable to lie flat or sit in a reclined position that exceeds 30 degrees to 45 degrees during surgery. We describe a new technique that we have used on 4 eyes of two patients. Both were operated on while sitting in a strictly upright position, resting their chin in front of a mobile slitlamp in the same manner as during a standard ophthalmologic examination. The surgeon sits on the other side of the slitlamp, facing the patient, and operates via a temporal corneal incision. The described operating conditions were deemed perfectly adequate by the experienced surgeon. Both patients recovered a corrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 in both eyes and said they would recommend this surgery to anyone who cannot lie flat. Surgeons should consider this technique when standard surgical positioning is not possible.


Assuntos
Catarata/diagnóstico , Implante de Lente Intraocular/métodos , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Postura , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Microscopia com Lâmpada de Fenda
4.
J Refract Surg ; 34(8): 507-514, 2018 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30089179

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the performance of two diffractive trifocal and one extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: In this 6-month, single-center, prospective, randomized, comparative study, patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were randomized to receive one of two trifocal IOLs (AcrySof IQ PanOptix; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, or FineVision Micro F; PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) or an EDOF IOL (TECNIS Symfony; Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Abbott Park, IL). There were 20 patients in each group. The primary outcome was binocular and monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) visual acuity. The secondary outcomes were quality of vision and aberrometry. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in either monocular (P = .717) or binocular (P = .837) UDVA. Monocular and binocular UNVA were statistically and significantly better for both trifocal lenses than for the EDOF IOL (P = .002). The percentage of patients with J2 UNVA was 52.5% monocularly and 70% binocularly for the TECNIS Symfony IOL, 81.5% monocularly and 100% binocularly for the AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL, and 82.5% monocularly and 95% binocularly for the FineVision Micro F IOL. There was no significant difference in binocular UIVA between groups; VA was better than 0.6 in 55%, 53%, and 35% of patients with the TECNIS Symfony, AcrySof IQ Pan-Optix, and FineVision Micro F IOLs, respectively. Overall, 90% patients achieved spectacle independence. There were no differences in visual symptoms and aberrometry among groups. CONCLUSIONS: All three IOLs provided good visual acuity at all distances, a high percentage of spectacle independence, and little or no impact of visual symptoms on the patients' daily functioning. Near vision was statistically better for both trifocal IOLs compared to the EDOF IOL. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(8):507-514.].


Assuntos
Percepção de Profundidade , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Lentes Intraoculares Multifocais , Facoemulsificação , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Visão Binocular/fisiologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Aberrometria , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Sensibilidades de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...