Optimizing teacher basic need satisfaction in distributed healthcare contexts.

Optimizing teacher motivation in distributed learning environments is paramount to ensure high-quality education, as medical education is increasingly becoming the responsibility of a larger variety of healthcare contexts. This study aims to explore teaching-related basic need satisfaction, e.g. teachers' feelings of autonomy, competence and relatedness in teaching, in different healthcare contexts and to provide insight into its relation to contextual factors. We distributed a digital survey among healthcare professionals in university hospitals (UH), district teaching hospitals (DTH), and primary care (PC). We used the Teaching-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale, based on the Self-Determination theory, to measure teachers' basic needs satisfaction in teaching. We studied relations between basic need satisfaction and perceived presence of contextual factors associated with teacher motivation drawn from the literature. Input from 1407 healthcare professionals was analyzed. PC healthcare professionals felt most autonomous, UH healthcare professionals felt most competent, and DTH healthcare professionals felt most related. Regardless of work context, teachers involved in educational design and who perceived more appreciation and developmental opportunities for teaching reported higher feelings of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in teaching, as did teachers who indicated that teaching was important at their job application. Perceived facilitators for teaching were associated with feeling more autonomous and related. These results can be utilized in a variety of healthcare contexts for improving teaching-related basic need satisfaction. Recommendations for practice include involving different healthcare professionals in educational development and coordination, forming communities of teachers across healthcare contexts, and addressing healthcare professionals' intentions to be involved in education during job interviews.

Reliability and validity of an extended clinical examination.

INTRODUCTION: An extended clinical examination (ECE) was administered to 85 final year medical students at the Radboud University Medical Centre in the Netherlands. The aim of the study was to determine the psychometric quality and the suitability of the ECE as a measurement tool to assess the clinical proficiency of eight separate clinical skills. METHODS: Generalizability studies were conducted to determine the generalizability coefficient and the sources of variance of the ECE. An additional D-study was performed to estimate the generalizability coefficients with altering numbers of stations. RESULTS: The largest sources of variance were found in skill difficulties (36.18%), the general error term (26.76%) and in the rank ordering of skill difficulties across the stations (21.89%). The generalizability coefficient of the entire ECE was above the 0.70 lower bound (G = 0.74). D studies showed that the separate skills could yield sufficient G coefficients in seven out of eight skills, if the ECE was lengthened from 8 to 14 stations. DISCUSSION: The ECE proved to be a reliable clinical assessment that enables examinees to compose a clinical reasoning path through self-obtained data. The ECE can also be used as an assessment tool for separate clinical skills.