Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 317, 2017 08 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28859629

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend referral to highly specialized care for patients with severe personality disorders. However, criteria for allocation to highly specialized care are not clearly defined. The aim of the present study was to develop a decision tool that can support clinicians to identify patients with a personality disorder in need of highly specialized care. METHODS: Steps taken to develop a decision tool were a literature search, concept mapping, a meeting with experts and a validation study. RESULTS: The concept mapping method resulted in six criteria for the decision tool. The model used in concept mapping provided a good fit (stress value = 0.30) and reasonable reliability (ρ = 0.49). The bridging values were low, indicating homogeneity. The decision tool was subsequently validated by enrolling 368 patients from seven centers. A multilevel model with a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) was applied. In this way, an easily implementable decision tool with relatively high sensitivity (0.74) and specificity (0.69) was developed. CONCLUSIONS: A decision tool to identify patients with personality disorders for highly specialized care was developed using advanced methods to combine the input of experts with currently available scientific knowledge. The tool appeared to be able to accurately identify this group of patients. Clinicians can use this decision tool to identify patients who are in need of highly specialized treatment.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Transtornos da Personalidade/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Leuk Res ; 38(1): 84-90, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24268350

RESUMO

We performed a comprehensive cost calculation identifying the main cost drivers of treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in daily practice. In our observational study 160 patient charts were reviewed repeatedly to assess the treatment strategies from diagnosis till the study end. Ninety-seven patients (61%) received ≥1 treatment lines during an average follow-up time of 6.4 years. The average total costs per patient were €41,417 (€539 per month). The costs varied considerably between treatment groups and between treatment lines. Although patients were treated with expensive chemo(immuno-)therapy, the main cost driver was inpatient days for other reasons than administration of chemo(immuno-)therapy.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Tratamento Farmacológico/economia , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/diagnóstico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Tratamento Farmacológico/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...