Management and survival of foetuses with trisomy 18 in a French retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to evaluate parents' current demands following the announcement of trisomy 18 and maternal risks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study was performed in the Paris Saclay Foetal Medicine Department from 2018 to 2021. All patients followed up in the department who had cytogenetic confirmation of trisomy 18 were included. RESULTS: 89 patients were recruited. The most common malformations at ultrasound examination were cardiac or brain abnormalities, distal arthrogryposis as well as severe intrauterine growth retardation. 29% of foetuses with trisomy 18 had more than three malformations. 77.5% of patients requested medical termination of pregnancy. Among the 19 patients who chose to continue their pregnancy, 10 (52.6%) presented with obstetrical complications, of which 7 (41.2%) experienced stillbirth; five babies were born alive with no survival at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In France, in the case of foetal trisomy 18, most women request termination of pregnancy. In the post-natal period, the management of a newborn with trisomy 18 is oriented towards palliative care. The mother's risk of obstetrical complications should be part of counselling. Follow-up, support and safety should be the goal of management of these patients, regardless of the patient's choice.

Pregnancy at 40 years Old and Above: Obstetrical, Fetal, and Neonatal Outcomes. Is Age an Independent Risk Factor for Those Complications?

Objectives: Maternal age has been increasing for several decades with many of these late pregnancies between 40 and 45 years old. The main objective of this study is to assess whether maternal age is an independent factor of obstetric, fetal, and neonatal complications. Patients and methods: A monocentric, French study "exposed-unexposed" was conducted during 11 years in a maternity level IIB. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were studied using univariates and multivariate analysis. We compared women aged 40 and above in a 1:1 ratio with women of 25-35 years old. Results: One thousand nine hundred eighty-two women were 40 or older (mean age: 41.9) on the day of their delivery and compared to other 1,982 women who were aged between 25 and 35 years old (mean age: 30.7) Preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, were significantly higher in the study group (4.6 vs. 1.5% and 14.5 vs. 6.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). We found also a significant difference for gestational hypertension (3.1 vs. 1.1% p < 0.001), preterm birth (10.4 vs. 6.5% p < 0.001), cesarean (16.6 vs. 5.4% for scheduled cesarean, and 50.4 vs. 13.9% for emergency cesarean, p < 0.001) and fetal death in utero (2.1 vs. 0.5% in the study group, p < 0.001). These results were also significantly different in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: A pregnancy after 40 years old is worth considering today as far as the risk factors are controlled and understand by the patient and the obstetrician. However, they have a significantly higher risks of cesarean, preterm delivery, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and fetal death in utero (FDIU). It is therefore the responsibility of the obstetrician to inform correctly these women in a detailed way, to reassure them and to adapt the monitoring of their pregnancy accordingly.