Lipoprotein lipase- and hepatic triglyceride lipase- promoted very low density lipoprotein degradation proceeds via an apolipoprotein E-dependent mechanism.

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is the primary recognition signal on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins responsible for interacting with low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors and LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). It has been shown that lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) promote receptor-mediated uptake and degradation of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and remnant particles, possibly by directly binding to lipoprotein receptors. In this study we have investigated the requirement for apoE in lipase-stimulated VLDL degradation. We compared binding and degradation of normal and apoE-depleted human VLDL and apoE knockout mouse VLDL in human foreskin fibroblasts. Surface binding at 37 degrees C of apoE knockout VLDL was greater than that of normal VLDL by 3- and 40-fold, respectively, in the presence of LPL and HTGL. In spite of the greater stimulation of surface binding, lipase-stimulated degradation of apoE knockout mouse VLDL was significantly lower than that of normal VLDL (30, 30, and 80%, respectively, for control, LPL, and HTGL treatments). In the presence of LPL and HTGL, surface binding of apoE-depleted human VLDL was, respectively, 40 and 200% of normal VLDL whereas degradation was, respectively, 25 and 50% of normal VLDL. LPL and HTGL stimulated degradation of normal VLDL in a dose-dependent manner and by a LDL receptor-mediated pathway. Maximum stimulation (4-fold) was seen in the presence LPL (1 microgram/ml) or HTGL (3 microgram/ml) in lovastatin-treated cells. On the other hand, degradation of apoE-depleted VLDL was not significantly increased by the presence of lipases even in lovastatin-treated cells. Surface binding of apoE-depleted VLDL to metabolically inactive cells at 4 degrees C was higher in control and HTGL-treated cells, but unchanged in the presence of LPL. Degradation of prebound apoE-depleted VLDL was only 35% as efficient as that of normal VLDL. Surface binding of apoE knockout or apoE-depleted VLDL was to heparin sulfate proteoglycans because it was completely abolished by heparinase treatment. However, apoE appears to be a primary determinant for receptor-mediated VLDL degradation. Our studies suggest that overexpression of LPL or HTGL may not protect against lipoprotein accumulation seen in apoE deficiency.

Using language intensity to increase the success of a family intervention to protect children from ultraviolet radiation: predictions from language expectancy theory.

BACKGROUND: Even though people are informed about skin cancer prevention, they do not always comply with prevention advice. From Language Expectancy Theory, it was predicted that messages with high language intensity would improve compliance with sun safety recommendations and that this effect would be enhanced with deductive argument style. METHODS: Parents (N = 841) from a pediatric clinic and elementary schools received sun safety messages (newsletters, brochures, tip cards) by mail that varied in language intensity and logical style. Effects on attitudes and behavior were tested in a pretest-posttest factorial design. RESULTS: As hypothesized, parents receiving messages with high- as opposed to low-intensity language complied more with sun safety advice. Messages with highly intense language were more persuasive when the arguments were formatted in a deductive style; low language intensity was more persuasive in inductively styled messages. CONCLUSIONS: By carefully adjusting messages features, health professionals can obtain further compliance beyond that produced by educating people about health risks and creating favorable attitudes and self-efficacy expectations. Highly intense language may be a good general strategy in prevention messages and works better when conclusions and recommendations are offered explicitly to recipients, especially when advice is aimed at reducing their personal risk.

Hepatic triglyceride lipase promotes low density lipoprotein receptor-mediated catabolism of very low density lipoproteins in vitro.

We demonstrate here that hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) enhances VLDL degradation in cultured cells by a LDL receptor-mediated mechanism. VLDL binding at 4 degrees C and degradation at 37 degrees C by normal fibroblasts was stimulated by HTGL in a dose-dependent manner. A maximum increase of up to 7-fold was seen at 10 microg/ml HTGL. Both VLDL binding and degradation were significantly increased (4-fold) when LDL receptors were up-regulated by treatment with lovastatin. HTGL also stimulated VLDL degradation by LDL receptor-deficient FH fibroblasts but the level of maximal degradation was 40-fold lower than in lovastatin-treated normal fibroblasts. A prominent role for LDL receptors was confirmed by demonstration of similar HTGL-promoted VLDL degradation by normal and LRP-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts. HTGL enhanced binding and internalization of apoprotein-free triglyceride emulsions, however, this was LDL receptor-independent. HTGL-stimulated binding and internalization of apoprotein-free emulsions was totally abolished by heparinase indicating that it was mediated by HSPG. In a cell-free assay HTGL competitively inhibited the binding of VLDL to immobilized LDL receptors at 4 degrees C suggesting that it may directly bind to LDL receptors but may not bind VLDL particles at the same time. We conclude that the ability of HTGL to enhance VLDL degradation is due to its ability to concentrate lipoprotein particles on HSPG sites on the cell surface leading to LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis and degradation.

Very low density lipoproteins stimulate surfactant lipid synthesis in vitro.

Surfactant synthesis is critically dependent on the availability of fatty acids. One fatty acid source may be circulating triglycerides that are transported in VLDL, and hydrolyzed to free fatty acids by lipoprotein lipase (LPL). To evaluate this hypothesis, we incubated immortalized or primary rat alveolar pre-type II epithelial cells with VLDL. The cells were observed to surface bind, internalize, and degrade VLDL, a process that was induced by exogenous LPL. LPL induction of lipoprotein uptake significantly increased the rates of choline incorporation into phosphatidylcholine (PC) and disaturated PC, and these effects were associated with a three-fold increase in the activity of the rate-regulatory enzyme for PC synthesis, cytidylyltransferase. Compared with native LPL, a fusion protein of glutathione S-transferase with the catalytically inactive carboxy-terminal domain of LPL did not activate CT despite inducing VLDL uptake. A variant of the fusion protein of glutathione S-transferase with the catalytically inactive carboxy-terminal domain of LPL that partially blocked LPL-induced catabolism of VLDL via LDL receptors also partially blocked the induction of surfactant synthesis by VLDL. Taken together, these observations suggest that both the lipolytic actions of LPL and LPL-induced VLDL catabolism via lipoprotein receptors might play an integral role in providing the fatty acid substrates used in surfactant phospholipid synthesis.

Lipoprotein lipase binds to low density lipoprotein receptors and induces receptor-mediated catabolism of very low density lipoproteins in vitro.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the major enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of plasma triglycerides, promotes binding and catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by various cultured cells. Recent studies demonstrate that LPL binds to three members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, including the LDL receptor-related protein (LRP), GP330/LRP-2, and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptors and induces receptor-mediated lipoprotein catabolism. We show here that LDL receptors also bind LPL and mediate LPL-dependent catabolism of large VLDL with Sf 100-400. Up-regulation of LDL receptors by lovastatin treatment of normal human foreskin fibroblasts (FSF cells) resulted in an increase in LPL-induced VLDL binding and catabolism to a level that was 10-15-fold greater than in LDL receptor-negative fibroblasts, despite similar LRP activity in both cell lines. This indicates that the contribution of LRP to LPL-dependent degradation of VLDL is small when LDL receptors are maximally up-regulated. Furthermore studies in LRP-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts showed that the level of LPL-dependent degradation of VLDL was similar to that in normal murine embryonic fibroblasts. LPL also promoted the internalization of protein-free triglyceride emulsions; lovastatin-treatment resulted in 2-fold higher uptake in FSF cells, indicating that LPL itself could bind to LDL receptors. However, the lower induction of emulsion catabolism as compared with native VLDL suggests that LPL-induced catabolism via LDL receptors is only partially dependent on receptor binding by LPL and instead is primarily due to activation of apolipoproteins such as apoE. A fusion protein between glutathione S-transferase and the catalytically inactive carboxyl-terminal domain of LPL (GST-LPLC) also induced binding and catabolism of VLDL. However GST-LPLC was not as active as native LPL, indicating that lipolysis is required for a maximal LPL effect. Mutations of critical tryptophan residues in GST-LPLC that abolished binding to VLDL converted the protein to an inhibitor of lipoprotein binding to LDL receptors. In solid-phase assays using immobilized receptors, LDL receptors bound to LPL in a dose-dependent manner. Both LPL and GST-LPLC promoted binding of VLDL to LDL receptor-coated wells. These results indicate that LPL binds to LDL receptors and suggest that the carboxyl-terminal domain of LPL contributes to this interaction.

The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein modulates lipoprotein catabolism by binding to LDL receptors.

The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP) is cosynthesized and co-purifies with the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor and is thought to modulate ligand binding to LRP. In addition to binding LRP, RAP binds two other members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, gp330 and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptors. Here, we show that RAP binds to LDL receptors as well. In normal human foreskin fibroblasts, RAP inhibited LDL receptor-mediated binding and catabolism of LDL and VLDL with Sf 20-60 or 100-400. RAP inhibited 125I-labeled LDL and Sf 100-400 lipoprotein binding at 4 degrees C with KI values of 60 and 45 nM, respectively. The effective concentrations for 50% inhibition (EC50) of cellular degradation of 2.0 nM 125I-labeled LDL, 4.7 nM 125I-labeled Sf 20-60, and 3.6 nM 125I-labeled Sf 100-400 particles were 40, 70, and 51 nM, respectively. Treatment of cells with lovastatin to induce LDL receptors increased cellular binding, internalization, and degradation of RAP by 2.3-, 1.7-, and 2.6-fold, respectively. In solid-phase assays, RAP bound to partially purified LDL receptors in a dose-dependent manner. The dissociation constant (KD) of RAP binding to LDL receptors in the solid-phase assay was 250 nM, which is higher than that for LRP, gp330, or VLDL receptors in similar assays by a factor of 14 to 350. Also, RAP inhibited 125I-labeled LDL and Sf 100-400 VLDL binding to LDL receptors in solid-phase assays with KI values of 140 and 130 nM, respectively. Because LDL bind via apolipoprotein (apo) B100 whereas VLDL bind via apoE, our results show that RAP inhibits LDL receptor interactions with both apoB100 and apoE. These studies establish that RAP is capable of binding to LDL receptors and modulating cellular catabolism of LDL and VLDL by this pathway.

Cellular catabolism of normal very low density lipoproteins via the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor is induced by the C-terminal domain of lipoprotein lipase.

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) binds to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor and induces catabolism of normal human very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) via LRP in vitro. Recent studies showed that the C-terminal domain of LPL can bind LRP in solid phase assays and inhibit cellular catabolism of two LRP ligands, activated alpha 2-macroglobulin and the 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (Williams, S.E., Inoue, I., Tran, H., Fry, G. L., Pladet, M.W., Iverius, P.-H., Lalouel, J.-M., Chappell, D.A., and Strickland, D.K. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8653-8658). The current study investigated the potential for this region of LPL to promote cellular catabolism of VLDL via LRP. A fragment comprising the C-terminal domain of LPL (designated LPLC) was expressed in bacteria and found to promote cellular binding, uptake, and degradation of normal human VLDL in a dose-dependent manner. These effects were present whether LPLC was added simultaneously with 125I-VLDL or was prebound to cell surfaces prior to the assay. Mutations involving Lys407, Trp393, Trp394, or deletion of the C-terminal 14 residues reduced the effects of LPLC. Three LRP-binding proteins, the receptor-associated protein, lactoferrin, and a polyclonal antibody against LRP, competed for 125I-VLDL degradation induced by LPLC. Heparin or heparinase treatment of cells prevented LPLC-induced 125I-VLDL catabolism. Thus, cell-surface proteoglycans play an important role in this pathway. Interestingly, either LPLC or LPL when added in excess could block LPL-induced 125I-VLDL degradation presumably by interacting directly with LRP. However, unlabeled VLDL could not prevent catabolism of 125I-labeled LPLC or LPL. These data show that cellular fates for VLDL versus LPLC or LPL are divergent. This is probably due to independent catabolism of the latter via cell-surface proteoglycans. In summary, these in vitro studies indicate that a fragment of LPL corresponding to the C-terminal domain mimics the native enzyme with respect to induction of VLDL catabolism via LRP. Because LPLC lacks the catalytic site of native LPL, these studies establish that lipase activity is not required for LRP-mediated lipoprotein catabolism.

Polymerase chain reaction amplification of culture supernatants for rapid detection of Borrelia burgdorferi.

A combination of culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was employed to detect Borrelia burgdorferi in in vitro cultures of skin biopsy specimens. Spirochetes were observed by microscopic examination in 56% (20/36) of the cultures from patients with erythema migrans who had not received prior antibiotic treatment. No growth of Borrelia burgdorferi was detected in control cultures or those from patients who had received antibiotics. PCR analysis of culture supernatants agreed with microscopic evaluation in 50/51 evaluable cultures tested (both positive and negative). At two weeks of incubation Borrelia burgdorferi could be detected by PCR in 19/20 cultures (95%) compared to 14/20 (70%) by visual inspection. This study indicates that a combined culture-PCR test for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi is more rapid and specific than culture alone.

Use of a novel technique of cutaneous lavage for diagnosis of Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans.

OBJECTIVE: Determining the microbial cause of cellulitis is often difficult. In this study, a novel two-needle lavage technique was used to culture Borrelia burgdorferi from the skin of suspected erythema migrans lesions. DESIGN: The yield of lavage cultures for B burgdorferi was compared with that of a 2-mm skin biopsy sample. SETTING: A Lyme disease diagnostic center located in an area in which Lyme disease is epidemic. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients with suspected erythema migrans who had not been treated with antimicrobial agents. INTERVENTION: Cutaneous lavage of the advancing edge of a suspected primary erythema migrans lesion was done for all 45 participants, 33 of whom also had a skin biopsy of the same lesion at an identical (14) or an adjacent (19) site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Growth of B burgdorferi in in vitro culture. RESULTS: Lavage fluid cultures grew B burgdorferi in 13 (29%) of the 45 cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 16% to 44%). Among the 33 cases in which both lavage and skin biopsy cultures were done, the yield of lavage culture was less than that of biopsy culture (P less than .09, 12/33 vs 20/33). If contaminated cultures are excluded, this difference is significant (P less than .05, 12/30 vs 20/27). CONCLUSION: Cutaneous lavage is a new diagnostic technique for recovery of B burgdorferi from erythema migrans lesions that has potential applicability to other types of cutaneous infections.

Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs.

Genetic distances were calculated among 37 inbred lines representing a wide range of related and unrelated elite Corn Belt germ plasm of maize (Zea Mays L.), using 257 probe restriction enzyme combinations. Genetic distances based on RFLP data were highly correlated with coefficients of parentage among pairs of lines. The RFLP-based distance had a higher correlation with single-cross grain yield performance and grain yield heterosis than any of the other measures of similarity we calculated using these same lines. The coefficients of determination (r (2)) from regressing the coefficient of parentage, grain yield, and grain yield heterosis on Nei's measure of genetic similarity based on RFLP data were 0.81, 0.87 and 0.77, respectively. A cluster diagram based upon the RFLP data grouped the lines into families consistent with the breeding history and heterotic response of these lines. We believe that measures of similarity calculated from RFLP data, coupled with pedigree knowledge and using molecular markers to locate quantitative trait loci (QTL), could allow maize breeders to predict combinations of lines that result in high-yielding, single-cross hybrids.