Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 204(5): 704-8, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23140830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with the best performance status have the best prognosis after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was undertaken to determine the impact of performance status on survival after pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) status (KPS) ≥60 after pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma were evaluated, and the impact of the KPS at 6 weeks after pancreatectomy on survival was determined using survival curve analysis. RESULTS: Recurrence was experienced by 84% of patients and negatively impacted patient survival. The median overall survival was 12 months, and the 2-year overall survival was 35%. The KPS after pancreatectomy did not impact survival when using survival curve analysis (P = .5740). CONCLUSIONS: Performance status for patients with a KPS ≥60 after pancreatectomy does not impact survival. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma without adjuvant therapy have poor overall survival, and KPS after pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma should not be used to withhold therapy for these patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Am Surg ; 76(5): 480-5, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20506876

RESUMO

Diagnostic imaging, surgical care, and perioperative morbidity and mortality have significantly improved for patients undergoing resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was undertaken to define the natural history and patterns of recurrence of resected pancreatic cancer without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies using current standards of care. Sixty-one patients underwent pancreatectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Tumors were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification system. CT scans were obtained every 3 months and recurrence categorized as: liver only, local, distant, multiple sites, or clinical. Median survival after pancreatectomy was 12 months. Cancer recurred in 51 (84%) patients. The radiographic site of initial recurrence did not generally impact survival; patients initially recurring at multiple sites had significantly abbreviated median survival of 5.6 months. AJCC stage was found to correlate with disease-free and overall survival, although tumor size alone did not. The presence of lymphatic metastasis correlated with disease-free but not overall survival. Overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains poor in the absence of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. AJCC stage is the best predictor of disease-free and overall survival; tumor size, lymph node status, and site of recurrence alone do not impact survival in a meaningful way.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 12(4): 682-8, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18266048

RESUMO

This prospective randomized trial was undertaken to determine the added efficacy of (32)P in treating locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Thirty patients with biopsy proven locally advanced unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were assessable after receiving 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy with or without (32)P, followed by gemcitabine. Intratumoral (32)P dose was determined by tumor size and volume and was administered at months 0, 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8. Tumor cross-sectional area and liquefaction were determined at intervals by computed tomography scan. Tumor liquefaction occurred in 78% of patients receiving (32)P and in 8% of patients not receiving (32)P, although tumor cross-sectional area did not decrease. Serious adverse events occurred more often per patient for patients receiving (32)P (4.2 +/- 3.1 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.9; p = 0.03) leading to more hospitalizations. Death was because of disease progression (23 patients), gastrointenstinal hemorrhage (4 patients), and stroke (1 patient). One patient not receiving (32)P and one receiving (32)P are alive at 28 and 13 months, respectively. (32)P did not prolong survival (7.4 +/- 5.5 months with (32)P vs. 11.5 +/- 8.0 months without (32)P, p = 0.16). (32)P promoted tumor liquefaction, but did not decrease tumor size. Intratumoral (32)P was associated with more serious adverse events and did not improve survival for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Radioisótopos de Fósforo/uso terapêutico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Radioisótopos de Fósforo/administração & dosagem , Radioisótopos de Fósforo/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...