Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Melanoma Manag ; 10(4): MMT67, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577557

RESUMO

Primary malignant melanoma of the genitourinary tract is extremely rare. We present two such cases in elderly Caucasian females. An 81-year-old female with urinary retention and polypoid urinary bladder mass and a 72-year-old female with gross hematuria and urethral caruncle. After thorough evaluation, they were both eventually diagnosed with primary urogenital melanoma (SOX10 and MART1-positive in tumor cells). In both cases, the presence of melanoma-in-situ and absence of primary melanoma in other sites were consistent with primary urogenital melanoma. Immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors and use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment are promising, as treatment guidelines remain unclear and overall survival is low. Additional clinical reporting of primary urogenital melanomas can help in better understanding and ultimately treating it.


Primary melanomas of the bladder and urinary tract are rare and usually deadly. They represent only 0.2% of all melanomas, including melanomas of skin. They can be difficult to diagnose and treat due to how rare they are and the lack of clear treatment guidelines. We present two cases of elderly Caucasian women who were unexpectedly diagnosed with primary melanoma cancers of the bladder and urinary tract after having surgery and analyzing tissue that was removed. Both tissue samples had features specific to melanoma and there was no cancer in any other organ, thus making them primary melanomas of the bladder and urinary tract. Current treatment approaches with surgery and chemotherapy have not improved the survival outcomes and prognosis associated with this disease, but treatment before and after surgery as well as cancer treatments that harness the person's own immune system are promising. By reporting additional clinical experiences of this often fatal disease, we hope it can be better understood and appropriately managed in the future.

2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 14(1): 31-39, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27715715

RESUMO

This study was to determine occupational exposures to formaldehyde and to compare concentrations of formaldehyde obtained by active and passive sampling methods. In one pathology and one histology laboratories, exposure measurements were collected with sets of active air samplers (Supelco LpDNPH tubes) and passive badges (ChemDisk Aldehyde Monitor 571). Sixty-six sample pairs (49 personal and 17 area) were collected and analyzed by NIOSH NMAM 2016 for active samples and OSHA Method 1007 (using the manufacturer's updated uptake rate) for passive samples. All active and passive 8-hr time-weighted average (TWA) measurements showed compliance with the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL-0.75 ppm) except for one passive measurement, whereas 78% for the active and 88% for the passive samples exceeded the NIOSH recommended exposure limit (REL-0.016 ppm). Overall, 73% of the passive samples showed higher concentrations than the active samples and a statistical test indicated disagreement between two methods for all data and for data without outliers. The OSHA Method cautions that passive samplers should not be used for sampling situations involving formalin solutions because of low concentration estimates in the presence of reaction products of formaldehyde and methanol (a formalin additive). However, this situation was not observed, perhaps because the formalin solutions used in these laboratories included much less methanol (3%) than those tested in the OSHA Method (up to 15%). The passive samplers in general overestimated concentrations compared to the active method, which is prudent for demonstrating compliance with an occupational exposure limit, but occasional large differences may be a result of collecting aerosolized droplets or splashes on the face of the samplers. In the situations examined in this study the passive sampler generally produces higher results than the active sampler so that a body of results from passive samplers demonstrating compliance with the OSHA PEL would be a valid conclusion. However, individual passive samples can show lower results than a paired active sampler so that a single result should be treated with caution.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Formaldeído/análise , Laboratórios , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Difusão , Humanos , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...