Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 18(12): e0295901, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153932

RESUMO

In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many in person undergraduate research experiences (UREs) to pivot to remote online training. To investigate how the COVID-19 quarantine disrupted student URE outcomes over time, the current study examines Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Promoting Opportunities for Diversity in Education and Research (PODER) URE outcomes across different platforms (in-person, remote, and hybrid models) by comparing student survey data from 2019 to 2021. Participants consisted of three cohorts: 2019 (n = 26 students), 2020 (n = 33), 2021 (n = 34). The BUILD PODER Summer JumpStart program (SJS), which aims to increase diversity in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) by recruiting mostly underrepresented students, was conducted in person in 2019, remotely in 2020 and using a hybrid model in 2021. All students completed an online survey on the first and last day of the four-week SJS program. We used one-way and mixed ANOVA models to analyze Cohort, Time (pre-test vs. post-test scores), and interaction of Cohort and Time for Research Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, Mentor Relationship, Mentee Knowledge, Health, Stress, and Student Program Satisfaction measures. Despite the platform changes, student scores increased significantly over time for all measures. There was a significant main effect of Time for Research Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, Mentor Relationship, Mentee Knowledge, Health Assessment, and Stress Management. Findings indicate that URE programs that are implemented remotely and using a hybrid format can provide students with experiences similar to in-person URE programs. In addition, remote UREs may provide added benefits compared to in-person programs. For instance, remote UREs could engage more historically minoritized students, who may experience barriers to access, such as work/family commitments, financial constraints, and geographic limitations.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Quarentena , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudantes , Engenharia
2.
CBE Life Sci Educ ; 20(2): ar23, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33938764

RESUMO

Underrepresented racial minority (URM) students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors encounter educational, social, and structural challenges on the path toward their degrees and careers. An undergraduate research program grounded in critical race theory was developed and implemented to address this disparity. NIH BUILD PODER focuses on developing science identities in URM students through a culturally relevant and responsive research training environment, ultimately increasing their pursuit of biomedical-related research careers. The current study examines differences in science identities and the intention to pursue a science career among a sample of undergraduate Latinx seniors (N = 102) in biomedical science majors. Three groups were examined: 1) BUILD PODER students, 2) non-BUILD PODER students who reported having a faculty mentor, and 3) non-BUILD PODER students who reported no faculty mentorship. Results revealed that BUILD PODER students reported the highest levels of science personal-identity and science social-identity upon graduation. Additionally, BUILD PODER students and non-BUILD PODER students with a mentor reported greater levels of science social-identity than those without a mentor. BUILD PODER students also reported the strongest intentions to pursue a science career after college. These results highlight the importance of identity processes in the success of Latinx college students in biomedical science majors.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Estudantes , Humanos , Mentores , Grupos Minoritários , Universidades
3.
J Am Coll Health ; 68(2): 124-131, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570403

RESUMO

Objective: The current study explores the role of health-related mechanisms (i.e. sleep, social support, and stress) in accounting for the impact of student recreation center (SRC) use on college-student well-being. Participants: Students (N = 540; Mage =23.67, SD = 7.10; 65.6% female) with membership to the SRC were recruited to complete an online survey. Method: The survey was implemented in Spring 2017 and included questions on SRC use (e.g. hours spent, facilities used), mental well-being (e.g. anxiety, depressive symptoms), physical well-being (e.g. height, weight, somatic symptoms), and the health-related mechanisms. Results: SRC frequency was associated with reduced somatic symptoms and ratings of overall health, though not mental health outcomes. Sleep was the most robust mechanism explaining the link between SRC use and physical health. Conclusion: Given the importance of sleep, educational institutions can promote student well-being by supporting SRC use and sleep quality.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Recreação/psicologia , Apoio Social , Estudantes/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedade/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Universidades , Adulto Jovem
4.
BMC Proc ; 11(Suppl 12): 21, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29375662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Unconscious bias and explicit forms of discrimination continue to pervade academic institutions. Multicultural and diversity training activities have not been sufficient in making structural and social changes leading to equity, therefore, a new form of critical consciousness is needed to train diverse scientists with new research questions, methods, and perspectives. The purpose of this paper is to describe Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD); Promoting Opportunities for Diversity in Education and Research (PODER), which is an undergraduate biomedical research training program based on transformative framework rooted in Critical Race Theory (CRT). KEY HIGHLIGHTS: By employing a CRT-informed curriculum and training in BUILD PODER, students are empowered not only to gain access but also to thrive in graduate programs and beyond. Poder means "power" or "to be able to" in Spanish. Essentially, we are "building power" using students' strengths and empowering them as learners. The new curriculum helps students understand institutional policies and practices that may prevent them from persisting in higher education, learn to become their own advocates, and successfully confront social barriers and instances of inequities and discrimination. To challenge these barriers and sustain campus changes in support of students, BUILD PODER works toward changing campus culture and research mentoring relationships. By joining with ongoing university structures such as the state university Graduation Initiative, we include CRT tenets into the campus dialogue and stimulate campus-wide discussions around institutional change. Strong ties with five community college partners also enrich BUILD PODER's student body and strengthen mentor diversity. Preliminary evaluation data suggest that BUILD PODER's program has enhanced the racial/ethnic consciousness of the campus community, is effective in encouraging more egalitarian and respectful faculty-student relationships, and is a rigorous program of biomedical research training that supports students as they achieve their goals. IMPLICATIONS: Biomedical research programs may benefit from a reanalysis of the fit between current training programs and student strengths. By incorporating the voices of talented youth, drawing upon their native strengths, we will generate a new science that links biomedical research to community health and social justice, generating progress toward health equity through a promising new generation of scholars.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...